Websleuths
Go Back   Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community > Featured Case Discussion > Caylee Anthony 2 years old

Notices

Caylee Anthony 2 years old Not reported missing for a month after she was last seen.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #26  
Old 03-08-2009, 10:02 PM
JWG's Avatar
JWG JWG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Northeastern US
Posts: 1,773
Myth: KC called Gentiva on the 16th, and many more times that week.

Even LE was running with that myth for months. In the latest document dump we see on several pages, including page 4300 (July 30, 2008):



Yet later we see on January 22 that page 4208 is updated:



The latter is consistent with the ATT records.
__________________
Smile
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 03-13-2009, 03:35 AM
ThoughtElf ThoughtElf is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 10,943
Dr. Lee did not find "17 more hairs" that OCSO did not find, as stated by JB during the sanction motion hearing on March 12, 2009.

HotDogs reviewed the previously released case docs after the hearing and educated us with this post from this thread: http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sho...79#post3449479

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hot Dogs View Post
The docs can be maddening to follow and try to understand. It looks like both OCSO and Lee missed hairs that were later found. It may have been Lee's visit that caused OCSO to re-examine things in which they found hairs that both of them had possibly overlooked.

Back in August, OCSO found 7 hairs on various liners and covers that are part of the trunk furnishings (this is not the "white bag" trash). Then Lee shows up in November, looks at the "white bag trash", looks at the liners and covers from the trunk, and finds a hair in the trunk itself. The liners and covers had already been removed from the trunk, so when Lee looked in - the trunk was already stripped of all this stuff.

While Lee was there, three hairs were found amongst the trash. It says that "we" found this evidence.

About 1.5 hours after Lee leaves, OCSO begins checking stuff again. They find 14 more hairs on various trash, liners and covers.

It seems that Lee found one hair, and his visit prompted the finding of 17 more.
Lots of great discussion about the 17 hairs on the same thread - pages 30-34.

Last edited by ThoughtElf; 03-13-2009 at 09:22 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 04-06-2009, 05:26 PM
ibyoungr's Avatar
ibyoungr ibyoungr is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: KS
Posts: 1,215
Per Anon call to Melich April 6, 2009 doc dump...

Caylee was seen by ANON caller to be with her Grandma Cindy on June 13th while Casey was at Fusion.
__________________
~~~~ There is a fine line between being a busybody and a sleuth.~~~~

Last edited by JBean; 04-06-2009 at 08:05 PM. Reason: stang fact that an anon caller reported seeing Cindy. No discussion on this thread please
Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to ibyoungr For This Useful Post:
  #29  
Old 04-11-2009, 04:32 PM
carrie carrie is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 442
Myth: It's been reported GA & CA sold Caylee videos for $225,000.

FACT: It has been reported that JB recieved 225,000.00 (from ABC), possibly on KC's behalf, for videos of Caylee.

There is a rumor going around, often stated as known fact, that George and Cindy sold videos of their granddaughter Caylee for $225, 000.00. This is incorrect. What has actually been reported (but has not been proven) is that JB received this money from ABC, possibly on behalf of KC, for videos of Caylee.

It was reported by private investigator, JH, during his taped deposition in the ZFG defamation suit. He calls the information “hearsay” which he received from DC. An excerpt from the deposition below shows the conversation between JH and JM and what was actually said:


(excerpt from pp. 70 – 71 0f rough draft of deposition given by James Hoover to John Morgan on 3/25/2009 in the civil suit by Zenaida Gonzales against Casey Anthony)

9 Q In the course of your time spent here as a
10 public citizen volunteering, did you ever come to
11 understand that ABC news had given the Anthonys or José
12 Baez money?
13 A I didn't know that to be a fact, no, sir.
14 Q Have you heard that?
15 A I heard -- I had heard that -- oh, that money
16 was given to the Anthonys, no, no, sir.
17 Q To anyone?
18 A Uhm, I had heard that money had been given to
19 the attorney for some individual -- I don't know if it
20 was given to the attorney or to Casey for some videos
21 that was on ABC news.
22 Q José Baez received money?
23 A Yes, sir, I think so. I heard that. I don't
24 know for sure.
25 Q Hearsay?
Rough Draft - 71
1 A Yes, sir.
2 Q Was it 200,000 dollars? Was that number you
3 heard?
4 A 200 or 225. I heard both numbers.
5 Q Was paid to José Baez by ABC News?
6 A Yes, sir.
7 Q And what was your understanding that that
8 money was paid for?
9 A Some videotapes that were released.
10 Q Okay.
11 A Again, hearsay.
12 Q Of course. Who told you that?
13 A Dominic Casey.
14 Q Pretty good hearsay?
15 A Pretty good, you would think.
__________________
"When we are born we cry that we are come
To this great stage of fools."
Will Shakespeare
Reply With Quote
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to carrie For This Useful Post:
  #30  
Old 04-21-2009, 07:28 AM
Devon's Avatar
Devon Devon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: England
Posts: 769
There seems to be quite a common perception that the term 'homicide' = murder. That's not the case, so I thought I'd post some explanatory info. here:

Homicide - definition

The killing of one human being by the act or omission of another. The term applies to all such killings, whether criminal or not. Homicide is considered noncriminal in a number of situations, including deaths as the result of war and putting someone to death by the valid sentence of a court. Killing may also be legally justified or excused, as it is in cases of self-defense or when someone is killed by another person who is attempting to prevent a violent felony. Criminal homicide occurs when a person purposely, knowingly, recklessly or negligently causes the death of another. Murder and manslaughter are both examples of criminal homicide.


So, if someone causes the death of another through a reckless or negligent act or omission, that is also homicide. E.g, if I decided to start up a new business offering some sort of outdoor pursuit type activity, abseiling on a specially constructed structure perhaps, but knowingly or recklessly failed to ensure that all the installations met the relevant safety standards, or failed to properly monitor the safety of the participants, and someone died as a result, that would be manslaughter. I would not have murdered that person, but I would still be guilty of homicide.

See also the following link for all the crimes that are included under the category of homicide in the Florida statutes:

http://www.leg.state.fl.us/statutes/...782/ch0782.htm
__________________
Oh what a tangled web we weave,
when we set out to deceive!
Reply With Quote
The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to Devon For This Useful Post:
  #31  
Old 06-24-2009, 12:18 PM
JWG's Avatar
JWG JWG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Northeastern US
Posts: 1,773
No fingerprints found on skull duct tape

I continue to see speculation on the board as to whether or not KC's fingerprints were found on the duct tape covering the skull, and that the FBI will surprise us at a later date with the bombshell evidence. The confusion arises, I believe, due to the very dry manner in which the FBI produces reports.

Here are extracts from the FBI report in question (discovery pages 3781 and 3782):

First we begin with nothing more than an inventory of the items received by the FBI:

The items listed below were examined in the Latent Print Operations Unit:
ITEMS FROM MEDICAL EXAMINER'S OFFICE
Q62-Q64 Tape
ITEMS FROM RESIDENCE
K10 Elimination fingerprints of GEORGE A. ANTHONY
K11 Elimination fingerprints of CYNTHIA M. ANTHONY
K12 Elimination fingerprints of LEE A. ANTHONY
This report is being issued by the Latent Print Operations Unit.

The three pieces of duct tape represented above were all found on the skull. Not included in this submission is the piece of Henkel's duct tape found around noon on the 12th near the original location of the skull, nor the piece of Henkel's duct tape found on the gas can.

So, standard operating procedure would be to first determine if there are any prints on the tape. Next would be to compare with the elimination prints to see if any person not suspected of being party to the crime but who had reason to handle the tape (such as at home for normal use) might have left their print on the tape. Lastly, if no elimination match, compare with the FBI database, starting with KC.

Results of Examinations:

The requested latent print examinations were conducted, but no latent prints were detected.


I think the FBI is pretty clear here: "no latent prints were detected". It does not say no elimination latent prints were found. They found nothing, and therefore did not need to do any further comparisons.

While a disappointing result, it is not surprising. That tape was exposed to the elements for quite some time and had begun to deteriorate. We are lucky they found sticker residue. We can hold out hope that prints might be found on the other two pieces mentioned above, but other forensic evidence is needed from the skull duct tape because the fingerprints are not there.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 06-24-2009, 04:51 PM
suepitzl's Avatar
suepitzl suepitzl is offline
Sue in Phoenix
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 387
Results of Examinations:

The requested latent print examinations were conducted, but no latent prints were detected.
This is speaking of pieces of plastic from the laundry bag in the FBI report just released last Friday http://www.clickorlando.com/download...9/19802052.pdf page 6600 or page 11 of 14 in PDF format
Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to suepitzl For This Useful Post:
  #33  
Old 07-26-2009, 06:22 PM
Morag Morag is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,111
Myth: Kronk's supervisor lived on Hopespring Drive

In some of the attempts to discredit Roy Kronk and his find, a rumor/myth cropped up that his supervisor, "Scott", lived on Hopespring and had sent Kronk to look for Caylee.

http://www.wftv.com/pdf/18740699/detail.html

Fact: no mention of "Scott" or Hopespring Drive among water department employees.


"Alex Roberts, Blue Earth Ct, Orlando...is Roy Kronk's direct supervisor."

"David Dean, Rouse Rd, Orlando ...with Roy Kronk the day he first saw suspicious items..."

"Christopher Gibson, Bo Jeremy Dr, Orlando...with Roy Kronk the day he first saw suspicious items..."
Reply With Quote
The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to Morag For This Useful Post:
  #34  
Old 11-01-2009, 01:45 PM
Morag Morag is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,111
MYTH: Roy Kronk was once indicted for kidnapping

In Kronk's own words, seemingly unchallenged:

In the early 1990s, while on duty with the U.S. Coast Guard in Key West, Florida, I had a girlfriend who made the decision to discontinue her relationship with me and move to South Carolina to reside with another man. At some time after her departure, she called me and asked me to come to South Carolina and help her move away from that individual. I travelled to South Carolina to assist her. Upon my arrival in South Carolina, the man she was living with engaged me in a confrontation. As a result of that confrontation, I was arrested based on false allegations that I had kidnapped my former girlfriend. The matter was submitted to a grand jury in South Carolina. The grand jury determined that there was no probable cause to bring charges against me. In recognition of the falsity of these allegations, all records relating to this arrest were expunged by the South Carolina court

Last edited by JBean; 11-01-2009 at 03:20 PM. Reason: removed some info
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 12-18-2009, 03:25 PM
JBean JBean is offline
WS Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Dana Point,CA
Posts: 20,221
you guys would save yourself a lot of aggravation if you started using this thread for listing hard facts that seem to be disputed on the board. When asked for a link you could just cite this thread if it was full of good stuff.
My tip of the day

PLease read the opening post to understand how this thread should work.

Last edited by JBean; 12-18-2009 at 03:26 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 01-09-2010, 12:54 AM
Jolynna's Avatar
Jolynna Jolynna is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,656
There was no meat or any other food product in the trash bag.

From Gerardo Bloise's report
,

page 22 http://www.wesh.com/download/2009/0121/18530363.pdf
Monday, August 25, 2008

At approximately 1100 hours I met with ASL Michael Vincent regarding a white trash bag with blue handle which said bag contained several items.(Art #1, Item #H-51-976)

ASL Vincent asked if inside the trash bag contained pizza or any type of meat. I informed ASL Vincent that when I checked inside the trash bag on July 16, 2008, I did not find any pizza or any type of meat.After said conversation, ASL Vincent instructed me to go to the Evidence Unit and retrieve art # 1 in order to re-check the trash bag again. At approximately 1153 hours I arrived at the Evidence Unit and I collected a sealed box containing the trash bag. At approximately 1300 hours I arrived at the Forensics lab and proceeded to open the sealed box.

Myself and ASL Vincent re-inspected the trash bag. No pieces of pizza or meat were found.

TRASH BAG INVENTORY

http://www.wftv.com/pdf/20321119/detail.html

PICTURES OF TRASH FROM THE TRASH BAG http://www.wftv.com/slideshow/news/20320624/detail.html

E-MAIL BETWEEN OCSO AND ARPAD VASS ABOUT THE TRASH:

-----Original Message-----
From: Vincent, Michael (OCSO)
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 5:30 PM
To: Vass, Arpad Alexander
Subject: **Exempt**

Doc,

I check the trash that was in the vehicle there was no meat products in the trash. There were pieces of a pizza box and other food containers. I will be emailing you a picture of the items first thing tomorrow.

ASL/CSI Michael J. Vincent
OCSO/Forensics Unit

-----Original Message-----
From: Vass, Arpad Alexander
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 5:33 PM
To: Vincent, Michael
Subject: RE: **Exempt**




Mike, not sure how I got that there was a pizza in the trunk – sorry about that one, but can you send me an itemized list of stuff that was in the trunk at the time the car was searched? Also, were the maggots on the pizza box?? Arpad

Arpad A. Vass, Ph.D.

-----Original Message-----
From: Vincent, Michael (OCSO)
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 5:40 PM
To: 'Vass, Arpad Alexander'
Subject: RE: **Exempt**

The pizza story came from the mother, who told reporters the smell was from pizza in the trunk. A local news station left a half of pizza in a trunk for seven days, there results were no smell, no maggots, just dried out pizza. I will send you the list along with the pictures.

ASL/CSI Michael J. Vincent
OCSO/Forensics Unit

-----Original Message-----
From: Vincent, Michael (OCSO)
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2008 12:40 PM
To: Vass, Arpad Alexander
Cc: Yuri.Melich@ocfl.net
Subject: **Exempt**

Doc,
Attached is a list of items that was in the trash bag in the vehicle. Also attached are pictures of the items. If there is anything else I can help you with please let me know.


ASL/CSI Michael J. Vincent
OCSO/Forensics Unit

http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sho...ll#post4081938

On
FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 2008
Atapproximately 1018 hours the following persons arrived at the Forensics office;

1.Dr.Henry C. Lee,
2. Mr.Jose Baez fromthe Baez law Firm Defense Attorney.
3. Mr.Edward E. Phlegar fromthe Baez Law firm.

and met for a conference meeting with this investigator and the following parties named below;

1. Assistant Squad Leader Michael Vincent from Forensic Unit.
2.Sargeant john Allen from Missing Person.
3. Detective Corporal yuri Melich from Missing Person.
4.Detective Corporal William Edwards from homicide unit.
5. Special Agent Nick SAvage from the FBI.

met and viewed items from the white trash bag. page 22 http://www.wesh.com/download/2009/0121/18530363.pdf

Lee wasn't denied access. He wasn't restrictred to viewing pictures. He found hairs in the garbage. But not meat or food.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 02-14-2010, 08:36 PM
JBean JBean is offline
WS Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Dana Point,CA
Posts: 20,221
George did tell Yuri about the decomp odor right away

Myth being busted:
It is thought that YM was not notified by the Anthony's about the decomp odor in the Pontiac when he first met with them.



George Anthony did tell Yuri Melich that there was an odor that smelled like something died in the back of the car when he first saw George Anthony. Hopefully we can put at least this myth to rest.

http://cfnews13.com/uploadedFiles/Anthony%20%20George0724.pdf

Yuri Melich:
One thing I’ve been meaning to ask, and I apologize maybe this isn’t a good time, but only because this might be the only, I don’t know how often we’ll be able to sit and talk. When I first saw you that night when I first came to your house there was a mention of the car. And there was a mention of what you smelled in the car.


GA: Uh-hum (affirmative).

YM: Do you remember what you told me?

GA: I, I, I believe that there’s something dead back there. And I hate to say the word human.......
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 03-06-2010, 01:39 AM
AZlawyer's Avatar
AZlawyer AZlawyer is offline
Verified Attorney
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: AZ
Posts: 5,942
MYTH: When they went to the OCSO forensics garage to examine the car, Henry Lee and Baez left for "lunch" and never returned.

FACT: They did return from lunch, and in fact didn't look at the vehicle until AFTER lunch. But they didn't spend much time looking at the vehicle.

November 14, 2008

10:18 a.m. Henry Lee, Baez and Baez's in-house PI arrive at the Forensics office of OCSO. They meet with Michael Vincent (OSCO Forensics), Officers Allen, Melich, and Edwards, and Nick Savage from the FBI.

10:40 a.m. Henry Lee began inspection of right & left trunk liners and spare tire cover (which had been removed from the car and placed in sealed boxes). The inspection of the trunk liners and spare tire cover, which probably had the strongest smell of anything from the vehicle and quite a few strange stains, lasted about 2 hours.

12:48 pm Henry Lee, Baez, and Baez's PI left for lunch.

2:15 pm Henry Lee, Baez and Baez's PI returned from lunch and began to examine the items that were removed from the white trash bag that the tow yard guy had removed from Casey's trunk and thrown in the dumpster. The inspection of the items from the trash bag lasted about an hour and a half. 3 hairs were found on the items from the trash bag.

3:40 pm Henry Lee began to examine the car. The inspection of the car lasted about a half-hour. Lee found one hair in the trunk.

4:10 pm Henry Lee, Baez and Baez's paralegal left.

Forensics officer Bloise decided to look over the trash and vehicle again since Henry Lee had found 4 hairs. Over the next couple of days, Bloise found 7 more hairs on items from the trash and 7 more hairs on items from the trunk.

Timeline beginning on p. 33:
http://blogs.discovery.com/files/18530237.pdf
__________________

"It would seem to me that June 16, 2008 was the last time that the victim was viewed by her grandparents. It became quite evident that from the OS of the Defense that the 16th was a date of great importance and that a so called time line of activities dealing with CA, LA, GA and ICA on the 16th and what, if any, activities took place on the 15th, 16th and 17th of June on 24 hour cycles would have been, at least, of a minimal requirement of review. I take it at some point you had a computer expert look at that data?" HHJP, 6/21/11
http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sho...139910&page=94
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 04-28-2010, 06:28 PM
LambChop's Avatar
LambChop LambChop is online now
WS Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: CT/NC
Posts: 17,589
Myth: That the skull had roots growing through it to indicate it had been on the ground for some time. The roots were reported as growing through the bags that were on the ground.


DOCUMENTS RELEASED: Sheriff's Office Crime Scene Reports
http://www.wftv.com/_blank/18740668/detail.html

Page 2
Reply With Quote
The Following 18 Users Say Thank You to LambChop For This Useful Post:
  #40  
Old 05-05-2010, 10:31 AM
JBean JBean is offline
WS Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Dana Point,CA
Posts: 20,221
Myth: LE needed a search warrant to seize the car.

According to YM they simply asked GA and CA to turn over the car on the 16th and they turned it over cooperatively; so no search warrant was necessary.

Page 2

According to Yuri Melich at the bond hearing he did not need a SW to take the car. As a matter of fact, he seemed to be making a point that he was working cooperatively with CA and GA and did not want to force them to give anything up by way of a search warrant. he did not want them to think he was viewing them in a bad light. So he just asked for what he needed and they were more than happy to oblige in an effort to aid the investigation to find their granddaughter. There us also a copy of the affadavit signed by george at 9:30pm on the 16th in the very first doc dump.(I think it is the first one)

Reply With Quote
The Following 16 Users Say Thank You to JBean For This Useful Post:
  #41  
Old 09-07-2010, 02:48 PM
merker's Avatar
merker merker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 110
Unhappy fact: roots were growing through bones

Casey Anthony crime scene where Caylee was found released 5 March 09

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/4787465/...sed-5-March-09

Page 2 of report, bates #3811, page 10 of pdf

"On 23 december 2008, I examined six medical Examiner, case 2008-001567, photographs (photos 293, 294, 300, 302, 303, 308) showing roots on and through bones. The smaller of these roots indicate approximately two to three months since the bones were decomposed to the point that roots could grow on and through them. The largest of the roots (appro. 2.0mm in diameter), in my estimation, could indicate a minimum period of approximately four months."

I know I read that roots were growing through vertibrae, but was unable to find it.
Reply With Quote
The Following 17 Users Say Thank You to merker For This Useful Post:
  #42  
Old 02-08-2011, 09:59 AM
merker's Avatar
merker merker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 110
Adding to my post above:
REPORT OF OSTEOLOGICAL ANALYSIS (page 9 of 11)
by: Dr. Shultz
PDF page 10, Bates page 23527
"Multiple minute rootlets have grown into and around multiple vertebral centra."
http://www.cfnews13.com/static/artic...edocRedact.pdf
Reply With Quote
The Following 16 Users Say Thank You to merker For This Useful Post:
  #43  
Old 05-02-2011, 05:28 PM
crucibelle's Avatar
crucibelle crucibelle is offline
Pisces
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Hellaware
Posts: 905
I see many people saying that it was determined that the duct tape on Caylee's mouth/hose was placed post mortem (after death), and some that say it was determined that the tape was placed before death. What the report actually says is "This duct tape was clearly applied prior to decomposition, keeping the mandible in place".

Link to autopsy exam: http://www.wftv.com/pdf/19801498/detail.html

The sentence is strangely worded (imo), but if you look at the sentence structure... the reason being given for the determination that "this duct taped was clearly applied prior to decomposition" is because it kept the mandible in place. In the early stages of decomp, no tape would be needed to keep the mandible in place, as the soft tissue would do that. It is only after severe decomp of soft tissue or skeletonization that the mandible would fall away from the rest of the skull. All that considered, it seems that the tape could have been placed EITHER before death OR after death ( before the soft tissue had completely decomposed).
Reply With Quote
The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to crucibelle For This Useful Post:
  #44  
Old 05-02-2011, 07:01 PM
LambChop's Avatar
LambChop LambChop is online now
WS Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: CT/NC
Posts: 17,589
"Signs of death may happen suddenly or they may happen slowly.

Movement, sensation and muscle tone are lost. This most often starts in the feet and legs and then spreads all over the body. The mouth muscles relax, the jaw may drop, and the mouth may stay open..."

I think this is what Dr. G. was referring to in her report. It was done prior to the jaw dropping. The soft tissue would not hold it my place, the muscles do and once they relax the jaw drops.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to LambChop For This Useful Post:
  #45  
Old 05-02-2011, 08:31 PM
crucibelle's Avatar
crucibelle crucibelle is offline
Pisces
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Hellaware
Posts: 905
Quote:
Originally Posted by LambChop View Post
"Signs of death may happen suddenly or they may happen slowly.

Movement, sensation and muscle tone are lost. This most often starts in the feet and legs and then spreads all over the body. The mouth muscles relax, the jaw may drop, and the mouth may stay open..."

I think this is what Dr. G. was referring to in her report. It was done prior to the jaw dropping. The soft tissue would not hold it my place, the muscles do and once they relax the jaw drops.
Lambchop, I suppose you could be right, but that's not what I think she was talking about, at all. The report also states: "mandible still in approximate anatomic position with no visible attached soft tissue beneath the duct tape." The reason this is mentioned at all, is because it's important. It's important because it was still attached in the approx. anatomic position, because of the tape... even with no soft tissue being present. If the tape had not been there, or not secured as tightly as it was, the mandible would not have stayed in the approx. anatomic position. I took that to mean that if the tape had not been there, the mandible would have been completely detached from the skull, not just "dropped". Some one else will have to weigh in on this.

Also, to clarify, when I mentioned "soft tissue" I was including muscles in with that. I should have specified.

Last edited by crucibelle; 05-02-2011 at 08:43 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to crucibelle For This Useful Post:
  #46  
Old 06-16-2011, 06:51 PM
countzero countzero is offline
self timeout
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,824
Nick Savage, who is FBI, is a friend of Lennie's. Lennie who loves to spout his stories by degrees of separation, convinced Nick somehow, don't ask, that Lee was Caylee's father. In the mean time, Lennie was spouting this to NG, who took off running with it and the media also did. This rumor had a life of it's own. We here discussed it.

Savage ordered this test to put an end to it, one way or another. Once the DNA analysis was reviewed by WS members, GA was also ruled out. Note, it was AZ who was one of the first to explain it as has joypath. The official explanation is all in a supplement report released by LE in the docs we have in the reference thread.

Originally posted in the sidebar thread, afternoon session 6.16.11 concerning WHO ordered the paternity test for Lee. On cross this date, Jeff asked the FBI if either OCSO or the State of Florida requested this test. She replied NO, it was Nick Savage.
Reply With Quote
The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to countzero For This Useful Post:
  #47  
Old 06-17-2011, 04:11 PM
Jolynna's Avatar
Jolynna Jolynna is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,656
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jolynna View Post
There was no meat or any other food product in the trash bag.

From Gerardo Bloise's report
,

page 22 http://www.wesh.com/download/2009/0121/18530363.pdf
Monday, August 25, 2008

At approximately 1100 hours I met with ASL Michael Vincent regarding a white trash bag with blue handle which said bag contained several items.(Art #1, Item #H-51-976)

ASL Vincent asked if inside the trash bag contained pizza or any type of meat. I informed ASL Vincent that when I checked inside the trash bag on July 16, 2008, I did not find any pizza or any type of meat.After said conversation, ASL Vincent instructed me to go to the Evidence Unit and retrieve art # 1 in order to re-check the trash bag again. At approximately 1153 hours I arrived at the Evidence Unit and I collected a sealed box containing the trash bag. At approximately 1300 hours I arrived at the Forensics lab and proceeded to open the sealed box.

Myself and ASL Vincent re-inspected the trash bag. No pieces of pizza or meat were found.

TRASH BAG INVENTORY

http://www.wftv.com/pdf/20321119/detail.html

PICTURES OF TRASH FROM THE TRASH BAG http://www.wftv.com/slideshow/news/20320624/detail.html

E-MAIL BETWEEN OCSO AND ARPAD VASS ABOUT THE TRASH:

-----Original Message-----
From: Vincent, Michael (OCSO)
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 5:30 PM
To: Vass, Arpad Alexander
Subject: **Exempt**

Doc,

I check the trash that was in the vehicle there was no meat products in the trash. There were pieces of a pizza box and other food containers. I will be emailing you a picture of the items first thing tomorrow.

ASL/CSI Michael J. Vincent
OCSO/Forensics Unit

-----Original Message-----
From: Vass, Arpad Alexander
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 5:33 PM
To: Vincent, Michael
Subject: RE: **Exempt**




Mike, not sure how I got that there was a pizza in the trunk – sorry about that one, but can you send me an itemized list of stuff that was in the trunk at the time the car was searched? Also, were the maggots on the pizza box?? Arpad

Arpad A. Vass, Ph.D.

-----Original Message-----
From: Vincent, Michael (OCSO)
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 5:40 PM
To: 'Vass, Arpad Alexander'
Subject: RE: **Exempt**

The pizza story came from the mother, who told reporters the smell was from pizza in the trunk. A local news station left a half of pizza in a trunk for seven days, there results were no smell, no maggots, just dried out pizza. I will send you the list along with the pictures.

ASL/CSI Michael J. Vincent
OCSO/Forensics Unit

-----Original Message-----
From: Vincent, Michael (OCSO)
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2008 12:40 PM
To: Vass, Arpad Alexander
Cc: Yuri.Melich@ocfl.net
Subject: **Exempt**

Doc,
Attached is a list of items that was in the trash bag in the vehicle. Also attached are pictures of the items. If there is anything else I can help you with please let me know.


ASL/CSI Michael J. Vincent
OCSO/Forensics Unit

http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sho...ll#post4081938

On
FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 2008
Atapproximately 1018 hours the following persons arrived at the Forensics office;

1.Dr.Henry C. Lee,
2. Mr.Jose Baez fromthe Baez law Firm Defense Attorney.
3. Mr.Edward E. Phlegar fromthe Baez Law firm.

and met for a conference meeting with this investigator and the following parties named below;

1. Assistant Squad Leader Michael Vincent from Forensic Unit.
2.Sargeant john Allen from Missing Person.
3. Detective Corporal yuri Melich from Missing Person.
4.Detective Corporal William Edwards from homicide unit.
5. Special Agent Nick SAvage from the FBI.

met and viewed items from the white trash bag. page 22 http://www.wesh.com/download/2009/0121/18530363.pdf

Lee wasn't denied access. He wasn't restrictred to viewing pictures. He found hairs in the garbage. But not meat or food.
UPDATE:

Today Dr. Huntington, the defense team's witness debunked the myth that food from the trash caused the smell, the stain, made the dogs alert, attracted the flies or were the reason for the results of Dr. Vass's tests.

The witness examined items from the trunk and then said: There was no food in the trash.

Trash vs Garbage is resolved.


Reply With Quote
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Jolynna For This Useful Post:
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
bc retained dec 9 08, e-pass records, lee not caylee's father, multiple knives, myth busters, no book with remains, no pizza in trunk

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Zahra Baker - Myth Busters - *LIST ONLY * NO DISCUSSION * ynotdivein Zahra Clare Baker 12 12-19-2010 08:11 PM
Kyron Horman Case - Myth Busters - *LIST ONLY * NO DISCUSSION * BeanE Kyron Horman Reference and Time Line Forum 14 08-10-2010 09:05 AM
FACTS-Just the FACTS- LIST ONLY- NO DISCUSSION -FACTS ONLY not_my_kids Haleigh Cummings Reference and Timeline Forum 30 12-20-2009 08:16 PM
Only the facts, Ma'am; no discussion yosande Sandra Cantu 9 04-21-2009 02:56 PM


© Copyright Websleuths 1999-2012 New To Site? Need Help?
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:14 AM.

Advertisements

Pre-Order Imperfect Justice: Prosecuting Casey Anthony today!