 |
|

07-12-2011, 02:45 PM
|
 |
I'm controlled by the cats
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 696
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NocturnalLady
I think that's what that one reporter was trying to ask about but it came out in a jumbled way about pictures of "Casey and Caylee" that ended up being sealed. The detectives seemed confused by that question because it was asked so vaguely and awkwardly and they replied that nothing they had was ever seal, it was all turned over to the prosecution and defense. So once again we have no real answer about the "bad photos" of Casey.
|
Yuri also said he had seen all pictures released to the media. It doesn't sound like there are any pictures sealed.
|
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Malini2001 For This Useful Post:
|
|

07-12-2011, 02:45 PM
|
 |
Calm and Watchful Now
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,746
|
|
Gee, none of them came across like the "railroading, co-conspirators" the DT made them out to be (and the oh-so-intelligent jury apparently believed them to be).
|
|
The Following 63 Users Say Thank You to TiaM For This Useful Post:
|
3doglady, 8paws, adb263, ahoyhoy, Alcina, Americka, Amity, Athinker2, BiancaS, Boytwnmom, Broderick, Brooke, BuzzieCat, CarolAnn, coco puff, dizzylou, dog.gone.cute, eddeva, Elley Mae, ExpectingUnicorns, Eye Wonder, Farfalla40, GreenTeam, hpvdr, Italy, JBounds, JDzWife, Jeanie, JSR, KathrynL, kew17, Krisy, lajones81, LaLaw2000, liltexans, Macushla, Maia, Mandy113, mikeysmommom, mitzi, mollymil23, Momma Hen, Mysteeri, MyTinkieGirl, Nenato5, nomoresorrow, passionflower, pferrin, rbrnmw2, rosepetal1065, Schu7, Softail, strawberry, summerthyme, SyraKelly, Talison, tezi, theBritster, TorisMom003, trigger, wildchild1961, zippitydoda, ZsaZsa |

07-12-2011, 02:46 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,109
|
|
Respectfully disagree. Police are not allowed to question a suspect who has counsel or has even requested counsel.
LE acted properly and worked very hard on this case. JBs client lied about this all along (imo) and therefore refused to pursue this with LE. imo, etc
|
|
The Following 36 Users Say Thank You to KathrynL For This Useful Post:
|
2goldfish, 8paws, AnotherGladysKravitz, Athinker2, BiancaS, biggirl, Broderick, Brooke, dizzylou, eddeva, HOOKEDNAN, Jeanie, jen&jonhart, KenoshaKid, krt, ladynana, LaLaw2000, liltexans, LinasK, Linda7NJ, Macushla, Maia, Mandy113, mikeysmommom, mitzi, Mystic, nomoresorrow, Paintr, pferrin, rosepetal1065, Solange82200, Talison, tehcloser, TorisMom003, trigger, ZsaZsa |

07-12-2011, 02:47 PM
|
 |
WS Moderator
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: sipping coffee at the Purple Rose Theatre
Posts: 46,181
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenTeam
What are these "bad photos"? Thanks!
|
it was a talking head theory... LE said they do not exist
__________________
This bee my opinion
|
|
The Following 19 Users Say Thank You to nursebeeme For This Useful Post:
|
3doglady, 8paws, Brooke, ChasingMoxie, dizzylou, eddeva, Eye Wonder, GreenTeam, Jeanie, KathrynL, LaLaw2000, Linda7NJ, Maia, Mandy113, mikeysmommom, mitzi, susan1122, SyraKelly, TorisMom003 |

07-12-2011, 02:47 PM
|
|
Author I'd die for you & White Satin
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 779
|
|
I'm not speaking about the presser here, they clarified points to drive home maybe to the jurors. But since day 1, It was all about saving KC, NOT the poor little girl named Caylee. How often did we hear her name mentioned throughout the trial and what her suffering was. May the liars all rot together in He$%.
__________________
Be sure to watch for my book I'd die for you.
Some accounts from real DMV victims
Hopefully will be published
First ten to IM me will get a free copy sent to them.
Des Sands
|
|
The Following 16 Users Say Thank You to DesSands For This Useful Post:
|
ahoyhoy, Americka, Brooke, eddeva, Eye Wonder, GreenTeam, hpvdr, Jeanie, jen&jonhart, krt, Mandy113, mikeysmommom, mitzi, passionflower, pferrin, ZsaZsa |

07-12-2011, 02:47 PM
|
 |
Watch us lie to cover for 'Princess'
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,251
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Queenofwands
IMO, all the records would have been turned over to the SA. The SA or the DT would then have requested certain records be sealed by the Judge. So, it is understadable the Sheriff's Office wouldn't have sealed records. JMO
|
But there would have had to be a motion to seal either by the state or DT, and there hasn't been, so there are NO pix of Caylee or Casey that have been sealed.
__________________
Justice For Caylee So sue me CA!
|
|
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to mitzi For This Useful Post:
|
3doglady, BuzzieCat, ChasingMoxie, dizzylou, Jeanie, LaLaw2000, Mandy113, mikeysmommom, NocturnalLady, Psmith, rbrnmw2 |

07-12-2011, 02:47 PM
|
|
Inactive
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 553
|
|
|
I do not want this case to cause ANY law enforcement agency, especially OCSD, to begin second guessing their investigations or evidence.
|
|
The Following 52 Users Say Thank You to Americka For This Useful Post:
|
2goldfish, 3doglady, 8paws, adb263, AfterSunset, ahoyhoy, Alcina, Amity, AnotherGladysKravitz, Athinker2, BiancaS, Boytwnmom, Broderick, Brooke, camcneishg, CarolAnn, coco puff, dizzylou, eddeva, Elley Mae, ExpectingUnicorns, Eye Wonder, Farfalla40, GreenTeam, hpvdr, JDzWife, Jeanie, JSR, KathrynL, krt, lajones81, LaLaw2000, liltexans, Macushla, Maia, Mandy113, mikeysmommom, mitzi, Momma Hen, Nenato5, nursebeeme, pferrin, Psmith, rbrnmw2, rosepetal1065, Softail, Talison, TallCoolOne, tezi, theBritster, TorisMom003, whiterum |

07-12-2011, 02:48 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 3,043
|
|
|
For those wishing that someone had asked the panel if it was over for KC or if she could be charged with something else, the answer is It is OVER for KC. Unless she commits a new crime when she gets out there is nothing they can do about this series of crimes. They let her off easy with all the theft charges and she didn't get convicted of any of these charges. They had their chance to add other charges and they didn't. So unless she commits a new crime when she gets out this is over. She is going her way.
In my opinion, the biggest punishment for KC would be to ignore her forever. I hope she never gets a decent job, that she never finds any decent friends, and that she makes 0 $$ off the death of her child. Everyone needs to boycott any enterprise of hers. Let her lead a lonely, miserable life mopping floors in timbucktoo.
|
|
The Following 53 Users Say Thank You to kathyn2 For This Useful Post:
|
3doglady, 8paws, AfterSunset, ahoyhoy, Alcina, Alice Ramnit, Amity, Athinker2, Boytwnmom, Brooke, BuzzieCat, cmsg2002, Cortne, crucibelle, Darkprincess65, dizzylou, eddeva, Elley Mae, Farfalla40, GiantPickle, gm8549, JDzWife, Jeanie, jen&jonhart, JSR, KathrynL, KenoshaKid, lajones81, LaLaw2000, liltexans, Macushla, Maia, Malini2001, Mandy113, mentalsolstice, mikeysmommom, milliac, miss plum, mitzi, Nenato5, nursebeeme, pferrin, Pollywog, SAgal, Solange82200, SyraKelly, Talison, TallCoolOne, theBritster, tigermending, Tiki, TorisMom003, whiterum |

07-12-2011, 02:49 PM
|
 |
Calm and Watchful Now
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,746
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by KathrynL
Respectfully disagree. Police are not allowed to question a suspect who has counsel or has even requested counsel.
LE acted properly and worked very hard on this case. JBs client lied about this all along (imo) and therefore refused to pursue this with LE. imo, etc
|
BBM
Exactly! In fact there was lengthy pre-trial hearing in March that dealt with this that apparently many people did not pay attention to.
|
|
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to TiaM For This Useful Post:
|
|

07-12-2011, 02:49 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,501
|
|
He had control over his client and didn't want LE investigating the rabbit he was going to pull out of his hat at the beginning of the trial.
__________________
As for presumption of innocence until proven guilty….
Since I am not a member of a jury and this is only a discussion board I do not have to abide by the rules of the court in order to express an opinion. If we were to assume that all defendants on this board were innocent, then there really wouldn't be much to discuss.
|
|
The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to Wishbone For This Useful Post:
|
Brooke, dizzylou, Eye Wonder, JDzWife, Jeanie, KathrynL, LaLaw2000, Maia, mikeysmommom, mitzi, pferrin, Psmith, tezi |

07-12-2011, 02:49 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,317
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nursebeeme
it was a talking head theory... LE said they do not exist
|
Yes I think it was just an interrogation technique they were using when talking to GA. I think the "bad photos" they were actually referring to were the ones showing Casey partying, dancing at the stripper pole, peeing in the parking lot etc. I think the "bad" was how the photos showed the real Casey. It was upsetting to GA in the interview to see those photos and the detectives were just trying to use that to get more info from him. IMHO.
|
|
The Following 21 Users Say Thank You to NocturnalLady For This Useful Post:
|
3doglady, Alcina, AZlawyer, Brooke, BuzzieCat, eddeva, epiphany, HOOKEDNAN, Jeanie, KathrynL, liltexans, Linda7NJ, Maia, Malini2001, Mandy113, mikeysmommom, mitzi, nursebeeme, Psmith, Solange82200, TorisMom003 |

07-12-2011, 02:50 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 96
|
|
|
As Yuri said, it is what it is. I believe this PC was held to try to bring some closure to the community that was harmed by this ill-gotten verdict. I hope we here at WS who have had difficulty with this outcome (absolutely myself---I too am surprised at how I am brought to tears when I think about all that happened--before during and at the conclusion of the trial) can take some comfort in knowing that we just saw these dedicated members of LE 100% believe(d) in the validity of the forensics and the evidence trail that they followed---and which, as most people know--only led to one person. I also am comforted that it was made clear that GA was never a suspect nor were ICA's fantastic allegations regarding *****'s in her mouth EVER substantiated by anything other then HER WORD---and we all know how good her word is---about as good as JBs.
May we find peace in this and in knowing that Caylee has found her peace in the arms of her Heavenly Father.
|
|
The Following 38 Users Say Thank You to Ninsi For This Useful Post:
|
3doglady, 8paws, Alcina, Amity, Athinker2, BiancaS, Brooke, DIXIECAT, dizzylou, eddeva, Eye Wonder, Farfalla40, GreenTeam, HOOKEDNAN, JDzWife, Jeanie, JSR, KathrynL, kjpaw, kljohnson0458, LaLaw2000, liltexans, Macushla, Maia, Malini2001, Mandy113, mikeysmommom, milliac, mitzi, Mysteeri, nomoresorrow, Psmith, rbrnmw2, Solange82200, SyraKelly, TorisMom003, wildchild1961, ynotdivein |

07-12-2011, 02:51 PM
|
 |
Maybe all one can do is hope to end up with the right regrets. -Arthur Miller
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Southern CA
Posts: 5,513
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by natsound
To be honest, I've been angry with LE for a while now regarding this case. I know so many of them did the best they could, but if they had taken Kronk's calls more seriously, who knows what may have happened. In any event, I remain shocked and disgusted with the verdict that was so clearly in error.
|
I agree. I'm mainly mad at just one LE, Officer Cain. If he had taken Kronk seriously back in August I'm sure there could have been more evidence found. Although with this jury I'm not sure even if a videotape of Casey killing Caylee would have been enough for them to convict her.
__________________
 Indeed the Irony IS Rich
Jodi Arias- "Quick on the slime, Slow on the facts"- From Juan's Closing Argument
"The difference between a stumbling block and stepping stone is the character of the person walking the path."- Travis Victor Alexander
|
|
The Following 25 Users Say Thank You to JSR For This Useful Post:
|
8paws, Alcina, AZlawyer, biggirl, Brooke, BuzzieCat, elementary, Eye Wonder, GiantPickle, JDzWife, Jeanie, jen&jonhart, krt, liltexans, LinasK, mikeysmommom, Nova24, Omachka, PMLsmom, rbrnmw2, robmom, Solange82200, Talison, theBritster, TorisMom003 |

07-12-2011, 02:51 PM
|
 |
WS Moderator
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: sipping coffee at the Purple Rose Theatre
Posts: 46,181
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kathyn2
For those wishing that someone had asked the panel if it was over for KC or if she could be charged with something else, the answer is It is OVER for KC. Unless she commits a new crime when she gets out there is nothing they can do about this series of crimes. They let her off easy with all the theft charges and she didn't get convicted of any of these charges. They had their chance to add other charges and they didn't. So unless she commits a new crime when she gets out this is over. She is going her way.
In my opinion, the biggest punishment for KC would be to ignore her forever. I hope she never gets a decent job, that she never finds any decent friends, and that she makes 0 $$ off the death of her child. Everyone needs to boycott any enterprise of hers. Let her lead a lonely, miserable life mopping floors in timbucktoo.
|
apparently she is thinking of changing her looks and her name... (and will also need to finish high school I suppose)
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2011/07/12...-release-from/
__________________
This bee my opinion
|
|
The Following 17 Users Say Thank You to nursebeeme For This Useful Post:
|
8paws, Americka, Amity, Brooke, Cortne, eddeva, Jeanie, KathrynL, kathyn2, LaLaw2000, liltexans, Mandy113, mikeysmommom, passionflower, Solange82200, TallCoolOne, TorisMom003 |

07-12-2011, 02:51 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,457
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by KathrynL
Respectfully disagree. Police are not allowed to question a suspect who has counsel or has even requested counsel.
LE acted properly and worked very hard on this case. JBs client lied about this all along (imo) and therefore refused to pursue this with LE. imo, etc
|
I think they were offering to investigate FCA's accusation of sexual abuse against GA and she didn't wish to press charges.
[wonder why]
JMO
.
|
|
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Tiki For This Useful Post:
|
|

07-12-2011, 02:51 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 19,209
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nursebeeme
it was a talking head theory... LE said they do not exist
|
That particular talking head also claimed the knife w/ DNA from both Amanda Knox and her victim was found hidden in a box, in the back of her boyfriends closet.
If and when you or anyone else e-mail this talking head and ask for clarification, corroboration or documentation of her statements, you will be promptly IGNORED.
__________________
Nosy by Nature and a Websleuther by choice
|
|
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Linda7NJ For This Useful Post:
|
|

07-12-2011, 02:51 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,593
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kathyn2
For those wishing that someone had asked the panel if it was over for KC or if she could be charged with something else, the answer is It is OVER for KC. Unless she commits a new crime when she gets out there is nothing they can do about this series of crimes. They let her off easy with all the theft charges and she didn't get convicted of any of these charges. They had their chance to add other charges and they didn't. So unless she commits a new crime when she gets out this is over. She is going her way.
In my opinion, the biggest punishment for KC would be to ignore her forever. I hope she never gets a decent job, that she never finds any decent friends, and that she makes 0 $$ off the death of her child. Everyone needs to boycott any enterprise of hers. Let her lead a lonely, miserable life mopping floors in timbucktoo.
|
Any company that pays money to her or her parents for anything, needs to be boycotted. There was talk of a promotion company dumping Baez, and I like to think it is because other clients of that company threatened to drop them. All of this profiting on the murder of Caylee needs to stop and that includes some of these nitwit TH folks....
|
|
The Following 32 Users Say Thank You to Broderick For This Useful Post:
|
3doglady, 8paws, ahoyhoy, BiancaS, biggirl, Brooke, BuzzieCat, coco puff, dizzylou, eddeva, Eye Wonder, Farfalla40, JDzWife, Jeanie, jen&jonhart, KathrynL, kathyn2, krt, liltexans, littebudot, Maia, Mandy113, mikeysmommom, mitzi, Omachka, passionflower, Pollywog, SAgal, Solange82200, SyraKelly, TallCoolOne, TorisMom003 |

07-12-2011, 02:51 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,671
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Broderick
As a lawyer representing his client he has every right to keep her from being questioned by police... Just the way it is in this country.
|
Yes, but if the allegations of sexual abuse by George are true, why wouldn't Casey want to talk to LE and possibly bring charges against him?
|
|
The Following 19 Users Say Thank You to Chilly Willy For This Useful Post:
|
ahoyhoy, Alcina, Americka, biggirl, Brooke, dizzylou, elementary, ExpectingUnicorns, Eye Wonder, GiantPickle, Jeanie, LaLaw2000, Mandy113, mikeysmommom, mitzi, nomoresorrow, passionflower, tezi, TorisMom003 |

07-12-2011, 02:51 PM
|
 |
WS Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 22,962
|
|
I think I'm misunderstanding your point. LE may NOT approach a defendant after the defendant has retained legal counsel. This is a constitutional provision. LE may only talk to the defendant with counsel's permission and in counsel's presence.
Salem
|
|
The Following 20 Users Say Thank You to Salem For This Useful Post:
|
8paws, Americka, Brooke, dog.gone.cute, eddeva, ExpectingUnicorns, Gardenlady, Jeanie, KathrynL, LaLaw2000, liltexans, Maia, mikeysmommom, mitzi, nomoresorrow, Psmith, strawberry, Talison, TorisMom003, zippitydoda |

07-12-2011, 02:52 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 607
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NocturnalLady
I think that's what that one reporter was trying to ask about but it came out in a jumbled way about pictures of "Casey and Caylee" that ended up being sealed. The detectives seemed confused by that question because it was asked so vaguely and awkwardly and they replied that nothing they had was ever seal, it was all turned over to the prosecution and defense. So once again we have no real answer about the "bad photos" of Casey.
|
Can someone explain to me about these 'bad photos' and who is Wendy Murphy?
__________________
"It is not a Justice System. It is just a system." ~Bob Enyart
"It is certain, in any case, that ignorance is the most ferocious enemy justice can have."
James A. Baldwin AMEN. We saw that on 7-5-11.
Rest In Peace, Caylee Marie Anthony. You are in a better place
|

07-12-2011, 02:52 PM
|
|
Author I'd die for you & White Satin
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 779
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NavySubMom
What do you all think? are any of the 17 jurors watching this?? Wondering about that.
|
This would be way too difficult for this jury. Their collective IQ is less than the sum total of the people in the room. Their greed will catch up with them as will it with CM, JB, AF, LKB, The A's and KC. Mark my words.
__________________
Be sure to watch for my book I'd die for you.
Some accounts from real DMV victims
Hopefully will be published
First ten to IM me will get a free copy sent to them.
Des Sands
|
|
The Following 21 Users Say Thank You to DesSands For This Useful Post:
|
BiancaS, Brooke, eddeva, Eye Wonder, Farfalla40, GreenTeam, IfIMay, Jeanie, jen&jonhart, KathrynL, lajones81, LaLaw2000, littebudot, Mandy113, mikeysmommom, nomoresorrow, Pollywog, SAgal, Talison, TallCoolOne, TorisMom003 |

07-12-2011, 02:54 PM
|
 |
WS Moderator
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: sipping coffee at the Purple Rose Theatre
Posts: 46,181
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Serjen
Can someone explain to me about these 'bad photos' and who is Wendy Murphy?
|
1) there are no bad photos (LE just said that)
2) WM is a talking head with a theory
3) hope that helps
__________________
This bee my opinion
|
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to nursebeeme For This Useful Post:
|
|

07-12-2011, 02:55 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 8,356
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kathyn2
For those wishing that someone had asked the panel if it was over for KC or if she could be charged with something else, the answer is It is OVER for KC. Unless she commits a new crime when she gets out there is nothing they can do about this series of crimes. They let her off easy with all the theft charges and she didn't get convicted of any of these charges. They had their chance to add other charges and they didn't. So unless she commits a new crime when she gets out this is over. She is going her way.
In my opinion, the biggest punishment for KC would be to ignore her forever. I hope she never gets a decent job, that she never finds any decent friends, and that she makes 0 $$ off the death of her child. Everyone needs to boycott any enterprise of hers. Let her lead a lonely, miserable life mopping floors in timbucktoo.
|
I think she may well end up doing something like that, as long as all these supposed media offers of $$$ are thwarted. She is uneducated,unskilled, with minimal work experience, no one to give character references and without CA backing her up she would flounder in the working world. We can but hope.
For myself I will contact any organization that makes an offer to her to express my outrage.
|
|
The Following 21 Users Say Thank You to ZsaZsa For This Useful Post:
|
3doglady, 8paws, ahoyhoy, Americka, Brooke, crucibelle, dizzylou, eddeva, Eye Wonder, JDzWife, Jeanie, KathrynL, kathyn2, mikeysmommom, mitzi, Nenato5, Omachka, passionflower, SAgal, TorisMom003, whiterum |

07-12-2011, 02:55 PM
|
 |
"A grandchild fills a space in your heart that you never knew was empty...."
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The Garden State
Posts: 4,242
|
|
|
What I have taken from this is that YES ICA is a Monster who Murdered Caylee Marie but escaped justice!So far anyway.
__________________
I Love You MOM  6/16/32 - 5/30/09
Justice for Travis 5/8/13
Justice For Emma
Stacey Barker - Guilty - Murder 1 - 5/24/11
25 to Life - Sentenced 6/17/11
Justice Denied for Caylee Marie Anthony
July 5,2011
|
|
The Following 38 Users Say Thank You to mikeysmommom For This Useful Post:
|
3doglady, 8paws, ahoyhoy, Alcina, Americka, Amity, annalia, Brooke, BuzzieCat, CarolAnn, crucibelle, DIXIECAT, dizzylou, eddeva, Elley Mae, Eye Wonder, GreenTeam, JDzWife, Jeanie, JSR, KathrynL, katydid23, LaLaw2000, liltexans, LinasK, Lovejac, Maia, mitzi, Nenato5, nomoresorrow, Nova24, nursebeeme, PMLsmom, Talison, TallCoolOne, tezi, TorisMom003, whiterum |

07-12-2011, 02:56 PM
|
 |
WS Moderator
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: sipping coffee at the Purple Rose Theatre
Posts: 46,181
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chilly Willy
Yes, but if the allegations of sexual abuse by George are true, why wouldn't Casey want to talk to LE and possibly bring charges against him?
|
my guess is because it was a confabrication...
((LE offered to talk with her about it))
__________________
This bee my opinion
|
|
The Following 17 Users Say Thank You to nursebeeme For This Useful Post:
|
8paws, Brooke, CarolAnn, dizzylou, eddeva, Eye Wonder, Jeanie, KathrynL, LaLaw2000, Maia, Mandy113, mikeysmommom, mitzi, Ninsi, nomoresorrow, tezi, TorisMom003 |
 |
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
| © Copyright Websleuths 1999-2012 |
New To Site? |
Need Help? |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1 Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:41 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
|