ZFG Civil Case: Casey's Deposition

[Chilly Willy]

Originally Posted by EPfan

I totally agree with you. The name would have to be exact, I would think.

And the description should be at least close.

[MissJames]

Originally Posted by Chilly Willy

Z?G was offered many jobs as a RESULT of Casey using the name ZFG. If she chose not to take one and better her circumstances, that's her fault.

No, ZG was offered many jobs as a RESULT of filing this law suit which was picked up by the media.

[Chilly Willy]

Originally Posted by MissJames

No, ZG was offered many jobs as a RESULT of filing this law suit which was picked up by the media.

I don't know which came first, but since Z(no F)G was offered employment as a result of Casey's actions, one could say she benefited from Casey's accusations.

[MissJames]

Originally Posted by Chilly Willy

I don't know which came first, but since Z(no F)G was offered employment as a result of Casey's actions, one could say she benefited from Casey's accusations.

Well if that's how it works ,I heard Jaycee Dugard got a good bit of money from her recent interview and her book,plus she had two kids by her rapist abductor. Did she benefit from his actions?

[LambChop]

Originally Posted by Chilly Willy

I don't know which came first, but since Z(no F)G was offered employment as a result of Casey's actions, one could say she benefited from Casey's accusations.

Somehow you can't erase those threats, the fact that you had to go to a shelter and felt as if you were living a nightmare. Damage is done. It could be 5 minutes being held by a terrorist, once the damage is done...it's done, irreverseable. KC did not offer to give ZG money to make up for what she has lost. If ZG was able to get a job and keep it, it was on her own ability...KC did not show up at work every day and do ZG's job for her. There was no benefit to her as the damage was already done. You can't tell a child forget about what those bad people said to you. You can say it to a child, you can tell them not to let it bother them but you will never erase it from their memory. Her girls are little more than babies themselves. I don't think ZG or her family owe any thanks to KC. I won't say what I'm thinking..lol jmo

[amickeyfan]

Much of the behavior KC (iCA, fCA or what ever we are calling her ) never showed that she was going to "kill" her child, but it did show what most display when they are addicted to drugs. She lied & stole from her family & friends. She was changing her friends, not introducing them to her family. She hid things from her family.. those are all signs of an addict.. and that she was not. Her mother did, if I remember correctly, at one time think she was doing drugs. The way FL is with those who are addicts, they throw them away in prison for years sometimes, her mother may not have wanted to do that to her.. her mother actually enabled her to continue on with those behaviors.... I don't think her mother had any clue she was going to actually physically hurt Caylee.

[EPfan]

Originally Posted by LambChop

Somehow you can't erase those threats, the fact that you had to go to a shelter and felt as if you were living a nightmare. Damage is done. It could be 5 minutes being held by a terrorist, once the damage is done...it's done, irreverseable. KC did not offer to give ZG money to make up for what she has lost. If ZG was able to get a job and keep it, it was on her own ability...KC did not show up at work every day and do ZG's job for her. There was no benefit to her as the damage was already done. You can't tell a child forget about what those bad people said to you. You can say it to a child, you can tell them not to let it bother them but you will never erase it from their memory. Her girls are little more than babies themselves. I don't think ZG or her family owe any thanks to KC. I won't say what I'm thinking..lol jmo

She, ZG was cleared almost immediatly.
The Z(F)G that KC described did NOT have tatoo's. The name was different. Why didn't she file a suit immediatly after she was cleared if it ruined her life. I smell a money rat!!! Just saying. Is she working now?

[EPfan]

Originally Posted by amickeyfan

Much of the behavior KC (iCA, fCA or what ever we are calling her ) never showed that she was going to "kill" her child, but it did show what most display when they are addicted to drugs. She lied & stole from her family & friends. She was changing her friends, not introducing them to her family. She hid things from her family.. those are all signs of an addict.. and that she was not. Her mother did, if I remember correctly, at one time think she was doing drugs. The way FL is with those who are addicts, they throw them away in prison for years sometimes, her mother may not have wanted to do that to her.. her mother actually enabled her to continue on with those behaviors.... I don't think her mother had any clue she was going to actually physically hurt Caylee.

You are 100% right on her behavior. At trial everybody testified that she didn't do drugs, just a few times. Wonder if they were doing drugs and covered their own hides.!!

[LambChop]

Originally Posted by EPfan

She, ZG was cleared almost immediatly.
The Z(F)G that KC described did NOT have tatoo's. The name was different. Why didn't she file a suit immediatly after she was cleared if it ruined her life. I smell a money rat!!! Just saying. Is she working now?

No, KC did not clear her. ZG finally went to M&M because she could not get a job because KC did not clear her and both she and her children were being threatened. Right now, at this very minute..there is no money. How long has KC been out of jail and she still has yet to say, herself, this was not the ZG who took Caylee. Why....KC would have to admit she lied and she's not about to do that. That "money rat" does have a name and KC is her name O. She also appear to be part of a pack. jmo

[ZsaZsa]

Originally Posted by LambChop

Am I remembering correctly or not? Didn't CA ask BOA to reverse charges on a cell phone bill that KC tried to charge on CA's account? They reversed it but nothing was ever done, correct. I seem to remember seeing that on a recent doc dump that had CA's checking account listed. Anyone else remember that or am I mistaken? jmo

Yes, I remember that statement, but can't remember the source. IIRC it was for several hundred dollars.

[ZsaZsa]

Originally Posted by EPfan

She, ZG was cleared almost immediatly.
The Z(F)G that KC described did NOT have tatoo's. The name was different. Why didn't she file a suit immediatly after she was cleared if it ruined her life. I smell a money rat!!! Just saying. Is she working now?

But she deliberately did not clear her name. That's the point.... she had the opportunity to do so and chose not to, in fact on a jail video which was broadcast to millions, she states to CA that she has not cleared "the girl down in Kissimmee' - she wanted to continue to use her name until it suited her not to.

[Salem]

Please continue here:

ZFG Civil Case: Casey's Deposition #2 - Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community

ZFG Civil Case: Casey's Deposition #2 - Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community

Salem