Darlie will never be executed

[trustice]

Just look the stats up, at
How much women on death row were in fact executed at the end...

They only way that will ever happen, is when she get a new trial and the jurors come to the same conclusions as in her first trial. (Which i think they would)

[krkrjx]

Originally Posted by trustice

Just look the stats up, at
How much women on death row were in fact executed at the end...

They only way that will ever happen, is when she get a new trial and the jurors come to the same conclusions as in her first trial. (Which i think they would)

Eileen Wuornos and Karla Fay Tucker are two that come to mind immediately. I am sure there were more but there really are not too many women on death row. Not compared to the number of men, anyway.

[2 percent]

Originally Posted by trustice

Just look the stats up, at
How much women on death row were in fact executed at the end...

They only way that will ever happen, is when she get a new trial and the jurors come to the same conclusions as in her first trial. (Which i think they would)

I don't understand. Why would you think a retrial would make Darlie a more viable execution candidate?

[texaslb218]

Originally Posted by trustice

Just look the stats up, at
How much women on death row were in fact executed at the end...

They only way that will ever happen, is when she get a new trial and the jurors come to the same conclusions as in her first trial. (Which i think they would)

Betty Lou Beets

[trustice]

Originally Posted by krkrjx

Eileen Wuornos and Karla Fay Tucker are two that come to mind immediately. I am sure there were more but there really are not too many women on death row. Not compared to the number of men, anyway.

yes, so?

Only 11 Women since 1976....and only 2 since 2000 were executed.
At the moment you got about 60 women on death row, so think about it....

with Darlie will that happen, imo:
http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/n...death-penalty-

"A Texas jury today shrank from condemning a former nurse to die after convicting her of killing dialysis patients whom she injected with bleach, according to The Associated Press.
Kimberly Saenz will spend the rest of her life in jail without possibility of parole, according to the AP."

Originally Posted by 2 percent

I don't understand. Why would you think a retrial would make Darlie a more viable execution candidate?

Because since she was convicted you have too much media coverage. As a example.."Unsolved Mysteries" or "The Investigators"...
Both shows covered the case like Darlie is innocent and an Intruder did this crime. And the police made a huge mistake.
Then you have one juror which convicted Darlie in her trial, whos know on Record stating that he believes shes innocent. Then you got the other mistakes which was made in her trial.
I dont think that under this circumstantes, she will ever be executed. Im actually pretty sure about it.

But a new trial and a new conviction would change public opinion and the media coverage. Then there would be, maybe a possibilty for her execution. But right now, i dont see a chance.

and dont get me wrong.....I personally believe she is right there were she belongs.

[txsvicki]

I don't think Texas will care if she's a woman being executed unless she does get a new trial. There's probably even more they could bring in for prosecution with new minds and looks at the case, so it would probably be the same outcome.

[cami]

Originally Posted by trustice

yes, so?

Only 11 Women since 1976....and only 2 since 2000 were executed.
At the moment you got about 60 women on death row, so think about it....

with Darlie will that happen, imo:
http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/n...death-penalty-

"A Texas jury today shrank from condemning a former nurse to die after convicting her of killing dialysis patients whom she injected with bleach, according to The Associated Press.
Kimberly Saenz will spend the rest of her life in jail without possibility of parole, according to the AP."



Because since she was convicted you have too much media coverage. As a example.."Unsolved Mysteries" or "The Investigators"...
Both shows covered the case like Darlie is innocent and an Intruder did this crime. And the police made a huge mistake.
Then you have one juror which convicted Darlie in her trial, whos know on Record stating that he believes shes innocent. Then you got the other mistakes which was made in her trial.
I dont think that under this circumstantes, she will ever be executed. Im actually pretty sure about it.

But a new trial and a new conviction would change public opinion and the media coverage. Then there would be, maybe a possibilty for her execution. But right now, i dont see a chance.

and dont get me wrong.....I personally believe she is right there were she belongs.

I don't think she will ever be executed either. Although I believe she's guilty as sin. I think she will be commuted to life without parole.

[4everenslaved]

Originally Posted by cami

I don't think she will ever be executed either. Although I believe she's guilty as sin. I think she will be commuted to life without parole.

Why do you think that?

[cami]

Originally Posted by 4everenslaved

Why do you think that?

Why? I don't know if I have a logical reason, LOL. I just don't think they will execute her in the end. The dna tests will drag out for at least 10 years..it's been four now. I'm hoping they will abolish the DP by that time.

[cami]

Originally Posted by txsvicki

I don't think Texas will care if she's a woman being executed unless she does get a new trial. There's probably even more they could bring in for prosecution with new minds and looks at the case, so it would probably be the same outcome.

they didn't care when they executed Francis Newton so they won't care that Darlie is. It's punishment for the crimes they committted.