wonderllama
Registered Snoozer
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2010
- Messages
- 708
- Reaction score
- 349
An excellent point.
Have an e-pat on the back for that one!
Have an e-pat on the back for that one!
wonderllama,
Kolar might not have a theory. He might actually know with certainty who did it. He knows the law so just cannot name his suspect so to speak.
.
I totally agree. In fact, I believe this case was solved years ago. That accounts for the fact that Boulder has admitted that no one is presently assigned to the case, and all the posturing by the new DA was just empty words. This case cannot be prosecuted and that is that. Patsy is dead, and BT cannot EVER be prosecuted, or even attached to the case at all because of his age at the time. So really, while we cannot prove it, we do know.
What a shame that all those innocent people accused in this case can never be publicly vindicated. I guess it's because it they were, LE might have to say why, and if they admit the case is really solved, it would be pretty obvious who was involved. If they said they knew who it was, then what would be the reason for NOT arresting them? Well- the reason is because one is dead and one is not able to be named.
And actually, the same reason applies to why JR cannot be prosecuted for obstruction of justice or tampering with evidence (her body). Because if that is known publicly, who else would he be covering for? It's a brick wall, no matter which way you look at it.
Obstruction of justice is a misdemeanor, and there's a 1-2 year statue of limitation on those.
I totally agree. In fact, I believe this case was solved years ago. That accounts for the fact that Boulder has admitted that no one is presently assigned to the case, and all the posturing by the new DA was just empty words. This case cannot be prosecuted and that is that. Patsy is dead, and BT cannot EVER be prosecuted, or even attached to the case at all because of his age at the time. So really, while we cannot prove it, we do know.
What a shame that all those innocent people accused in this case can never be publicly vindicated. I guess it's because it they were, LE might have to say why, and if they admit the case is really solved, it would be pretty obvious who was involved. If they said they knew who it was, then what would be the reason for NOT arresting them? Well- the reason is because one is dead and one is not able to be named.
And actually, the same reason applies to why JR cannot be prosecuted for obstruction of justice or tampering with evidence (her body). Because if that is known publicly, who else would he be covering for? It's a brick wall, no matter which way you look at it.
I'm starting to think that Acme there just about summed it up.
Assuming you don't believe in the Intruder Theory, it is now the only real theory that fits with the evidence.
Burke, then Patsy, then John.
John & Patsy said all along that they didn't kill their daughter, and they didn't, or at least not with a bash to the head.
I haven't read Kolar's book, it'll be some time before I do, but from the posts here it really does seem like Tricia said - all the pieces are coming together.
Kolar was very clear about avoiding conversations relating to Burke in the interview with Tricia and rightly so. No questions can be answered without him actually revealing his own personal theory, and that is clearly going to get him in to trouble.
Ok well I had a dream which caused me to change my first theory about what really happend to Jonbenet Ramsey! At first that older brother was the one I thought had something to do with it cause he is creepy to me lol but any how I had the weirdest dream about that night.I had a dream I opened the door and there stood Patsy Ramsey at there home in boulder and she was wearing the outfit she had on that night. She wanted to show me what had really happend. first she walks me into this small kitchen area and shows me the pad she wrote the randsom letter on then she walks me into the main kitchen. I guess and thier set burke and jonbenet it as like 12o in the mourning they were eating I guess a late night snack. burke and jonenet where fighting the way kids do but burke had a flashlight in front of him. patsy went up stairs to get ready or bed leaving them in the kitchen and burke grabbed the flash light and wacked her on the head cause she was making him mad. He hit her hard she screamed load patsy runs down stairs grabs her and she was out. she freaks she calls for jon to come fast he does than they send burke to his room and after the relize she was gone they start to panic jon keeps saying call the 911 patsy frezzes and takes the phone from jon screaming they will put him in jail! so in a panic patsy starts to plan how to save burke and what to do she wasnt thinking clearly she couldnt think so then she decides to sit down it came to her to fake a kidnapping and all that jon makes it look like a bad kiddnapping gone wrong but he did all that in the kitchen than moved her to the basement crying and freaked out patsy writes the letter they set the sceane and then call the cops burke didnt know that had killed her he was worried. His parents were angry he didnt know what happend they sent him back to his room! Anyway this was just a dream but when I woke up it really freaked me out no i am not claming to be psychic or anything here so dont get the wrong idea just a strange dream but it did make sense to me after! I have never met any of them in my life and when this all really happend I was like 13 or so but to dream it like that was very strange to me!
Except that it doesn't fit the evidence. There was a dead body in the basement when the 911 call was made. The RN is inconsistent with a body. The body well hidden is inconsistent with an intruder.
Ok well I had a dream which caused me to change my first theory about what really happend to Jonbenet Ramsey! At first that older brother was the one I thought had something to do with it cause he is creepy to me lol but any how I had the weirdest dream about that night.I had a dream I opened the door and there stood Patsy Ramsey at there home in boulder and she was wearing the outfit she had on that night. She wanted to show me what had really happend. first she walks me into this small kitchen area and shows me the pad she wrote the randsom letter on then she walks me into the main kitchen. I guess and thier set burke and jonbenet it as like 12o in the mourning they were eating I guess a late night snack. burke and jonenet where fighting the way kids do but burke had a flashlight in front of him. patsy went up stairs to get ready or bed leaving them in the kitchen and burke grabbed the flash light and wacked her on the head cause she was making him mad. He hit her hard she screamed load patsy runs down stairs grabs her and she was out. she freaks she calls for jon to come fast he does than they send burke to his room and after the relize she was gone they start to panic jon keeps saying call the 911 patsy frezzes and takes the phone from jon screaming they will put him in jail! so in a panic patsy starts to plan how to save burke and what to do she wasnt thinking clearly she couldnt think so then she decides to sit down it came to her to fake a kidnapping and all that jon makes it look like a bad kiddnapping gone wrong but he did all that in the kitchen than moved her to the basement crying and freaked out patsy writes the letter they set the sceane and then call the cops burke didnt know that had killed her he was worried. His parents were angry he didnt know what happend they sent him back to his room! Anyway this was just a dream but when I woke up it really freaked me out no i am not claming to be psychic or anything here so dont get the wrong idea just a strange dream but it did make sense to me after! I have never met any of them in my life and when this all really happend I was like 13 or so but to dream it like that was very strange to me!
I recently posted summaries of the most popular theories of this case, including IDI, PDI, P & J DI, and BDI.
My point in each case is to reveal how fantastic, and in fact utterly implausible, each one is. While a great many on this and other forums have proposed scenarios that fit some of the evidence, when we consider all the evidence, they all have very serious problems and in fact break down completely. I invite anyone who feels that my summary of his or her favorite theory is unfair to respond with a comment on the blog.
I'm not saying an intruder, I'm saying Burke.
*slap*
hehe
And this is exactly what one frequently finds in (poorly) staged scenes: the staging contradicts the evidence, and investigators become suspicious.I know what you mean. BR hit JB in the head with a golf club, so JR/PR conspire to save BR from - nothing. To achieve this lofty goal, they stage a kidnapping scenario.
But my reply is that a kidnapping is inconsistent with a RN, and PR called 911 when the body was in the house which is inconsistent the need to dump the body - if the kidnapping scenario is going to be plausible. So it's not consistent with the evidence. The scenario they have apparently tried to stage is inconsistent with the evidence.
And this is exactly what one frequently finds in (poorly) staged scenes: the staging contradicts the evidence, and investigators become suspicious.
I think the Ramseys wavered back and forth for quite sime time as for what staged scene they were going to present to the police. Maybe they initially thought hat a sexual predator scenario alone would be enough, but then added the 'foreign faction kidnapping attempt' to direct the police away from immediately focusing on the family.