Crime scene photos #2

Status
Not open for further replies.
Ask a family member who is color-blind to look at those pictures. Because they can't rely on colors, they have a highly developed ability to pick out shapes amid clutter. The more color-blind he is, the better for this purpose.

Just a thought
 
Are you talking to yourself again? :crazy:

I can see the image you're describing. If that's an old photo it's either covered in plastic or it was protected from the elements these past 6 mos. No way that would have survived. Looks like early 1900's to me tho, not 50's.

Now I wonder who it is?!?


Yup. I was just in my closet, looking for my straight jacket. :crazy:

So it does look like a picture !! I'm not crazy ! And you're right, it does look dated to the early 1900's. I wonder if it was maybe something tucked into the book and just wiggled it's way out with the elements...
 
I see both the book as well as the photo. The book could in fact be an unusual pattern of yellow and brown leaves but the hard line they form makes that a bit doubtful. I also see the black plastic bag but I do not see anything resembling a skull.

I missed the PC...Did they mention anything about any other objects/items found on site with the body???

no darn it - they aren't sharing any other info found at the scene except the bones.
 
Are you talking to yourself again? :crazy:

I can see the image you're describing. If that's an old photo it's either covered in plastic or it was protected from the elements these past 6 mos. No way that would have survived. Looks like early 1900's to me tho, not 50's.

Now I wonder who it is?!?

aarrghh! I still can't see a picture! I'm getting frustrated!
 
Ask a family member who is color-blind to look at those pictures. Because they can't rely on colors, they have a highly developed ability to pick out shapes amid clutter. The more color-blind he is, the better for this purpose.

Just a thought


You must be referring to the DH ! Aren't most guys colorblind ? Mine already thinks I'm crazy, so I better not show him ... :crazy::crazy:
 
Are you talking to yourself again? :crazy:

I can see the image you're describing. If that's an old photo it's either covered in plastic or it was protected from the elements these past 6 mos. No way that would have survived. Looks like early 1900's to me tho, not 50's.

Now I wonder who it is?!?

I have some metal photos like that of my great great grandfather. Being on metal plates they will survive almost anything. The ones I have are from the 1800s. I wonder from the pose, and the looks of it, if that could be metal.

That would explain why they took the picture frames from the Anthonys maybe.
 
I have some metal photos like that of my great great grandfather. Being on metal plates they will survive almost anything. The ones I have are from the 1800s. I wonder from the pose, and the looks of it, if that could be metal.

That would explain why they took the picture frames from the Anthonys maybe.
They took picture frames from the home? I haven't read anything about that???
 
Ask a family member who is color-blind to look at those pictures. Because they can't rely on colors, they have a highly developed ability to pick out shapes amid clutter. The more color-blind he is, the better for this purpose.

Just a thought
IIRC Lee is color blind
 
I'm sure they know what has been released.

This would not be the first time someone made a mistake.

Like I said before, the time stamp on this photo is definitely before the bad was removed. The focus of the photo is clearly on the bag, the "skull" that we are seeing is not up in the air but laying on the ground at the base of the bag on top of some brush.


If you look at the orig photo you can see the image still looks like a skull.

This was a big boo boo IMO.

cspics.jpg
[/IMG]

If you zoom in 400% on this photo you can see a little tiny chubby little face that looks like Caylee to the left of the alleged ductape. Coincidence, I know...but still. RIP little baby.
 
I have some metal photos like that of my great great grandfather. Being on metal plates they will survive almost anything. The ones I have are from the 1800s. I wonder from the pose, and the looks of it, if that could be metal.

That would explain why they took the picture frames from the Anthonys maybe.

:eek:

well at least now I feel a little better knowing I haven't lost my sanity !
 
I have obsessed over these photos pretty much all day! Not because of the macarbe aspect of them, but because it is something I feel like I can "do". Does that make sense?? This case has been so passive - after the initial flurry of MySpace and Facebook investigation, there wasn't much to "sleuth". Anyway, I no longer thing we are seeing either a black bag or a skull. Here are some pictures I have tried to explain with my cheap MS Paint program:

1. The "Black Bag" - Early Crime Scene Photo.
http://i223.photobucket.com/albums/dd234/reannan1462/Caylee Anthony/Early-PossibleBlackBag.jpg

2. The "Black Bag" area after some vegitation has been removed and after a tent has been errected.
http://i223.photobucket.com/albums/dd234/reannan1462/Caylee Anthony/Later-BlackBagAreawithTent.jpg

3. Close up of the "Black Bag" from vegitation cleared and tented area = tree trunk with vegetation as the "skull".
http://i223.photobucket.com/albums/dd234/reannan1462/Caylee Anthony/BlackBagCloseUp-TreeTrunk.jpg

I know there are those out there who are going to say that all of this agonizing over photo's is stupid, but I don't think it is a waste of tiime. For one thing, we hone our skills by doing this sort of analysis. When Eve Carson was kidnapped and killed, LE released the ATM photo of the perp, and many here at WS's detected the presence of a second individual in the backseat WAY before LE ever mentioned it. The picture that was released by Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation of an "injured woman" who they were trying to identify - we at WS's determined that she was dead, found the original photo, and determined that she was Middle Eastern; from a single photo. Thus, I make no apologies for analyzing these pictures. I feel this is as valid as anything else we do on WS's. :crazy:
 
Here's the photo where I've marked it up, where I think it looks like a photo of someone at the crime scene. It almost looks like a superimposed picture, but then again, I could be seeing things. thoughts ?

View attachment 1071

I see it too. Now someone please humor me and try something I just did and see what you come up with. Crop and rotate that picture different ways and enlarge it again and use your imagination to see what you think, or if my eyes (and brain) are gone.

Sometimes it almost looks like a picture of Caylee, and rotate again and it almost looks like 3 people with a man (GA?) standing behind someone else. Of course, it also looks like Spongebob if you squint hard enough, lol...
 
They keep saying that the skull rolled out of the bag. Based on the photos I'm seeing, whatever this object is, is above the bag, and it couldn't have rolled up the tree ????

this photo is a straight ahead shot.

when picked up the bag it could have rolled into the woods instead of towards the road. that wait it would show above the bag. gwim?
 
Do you really think that the prosecution would release a picture of Caylee's skull? Seriously?

All I can see is that frightened "face" gazing leftward. It was the first thing I saw last night, and tonight it's still there. The image won't go away no matter how many times I blink or zoom in and out. It's like switching between the old crone and the woman at her vanity, but this time I can't. Strange how the mind works.:waitasec:
 
I see it too. Now someone please humor me and try something I just did and see what you come up with. Crop and rotate that picture different ways and enlarge it again and use your imagination to see what you think, or if my eyes (and brain) are gone.

Sometimes it almost looks like a picture of Caylee, and rotate again and it almost looks like 3 people with a man (GA?) standing behind someone else. Of course, it also looks like Spongebob if you squint hard enough, lol...

Rotating the photo by a 90 degree counter clockwise turn, it looks like a posed black and white photo of Casey.
 
One of the 'skull' pictures posted before. (Curves, b/w balance edited to bring out different colors/textures better)

4vsbpk.jpg


I just don't see it.
 
put your hand over the owl looking thing, then you should be able to see what everyone is talking about
 
One of the 'skull' pictures posted before. (Curves, b/w balance edited to bring out different colors/textures better)

4vsbpk.jpg


I just don't see it.

Thanks for posting this, Egoslayer. I can make out the picture in the evidence photo much better in this one (top left of "skull") It really looks like a three quarter head shot of Casey Anthony. It appears to be a dark-haired girl or woman with hair parted in the middle. The photo seems to curl, obscuring the mouth area, but the neck is visible.
 
If I'm not mistaken wasn't it later in the day on 12/11 that the ME removed the remains from the area. If this is correct, then according to the exif data on this picture it was made before anything was taken into custody from the site....so it's very possible that it is Caylees book that might have been in the bag with her, and the bag is more than likely the one that the MR found. Below is the part of the info embedded in the picture, I bolded the date/time the picture was made.

* Exposure Time (1 / Shutter Speed) = 1/60 second = 0.01667 second
* Lens F-Number/F-Stop = 40/10 = F4
* Exposure Program = normal program (2)
* ISO Speed Ratings = 400
* Exif Version = 0221
* Original Date/Time = 2008:12:11 11:54:43
* Digitization Date/Time = 2008:12:11 11:54:43
* Components Configuration = 0x01,0x02,0x03,0x00 / YCbCr
* Shutter Speed Value (APEX) = 387114/65536
Shutter Speed (Exposure Time) = 1/60 second
* Aperture Value (APEX) = 262144/65536
Aperture = F4
* Exposure Bias (EV) = 0/2 = 0
* Metering Mode = pattern / multi-segment (5)
* Flash = Flash fired, compulsory flash mode
* Focal Length = 24/1 mm = 24 mm
* User Comment (Hex) = 0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00
User Comment Character Code = not defined
* FlashPix Version = 0100
* Colour Space = sRGB (1)
* Image Width = 640 pixels
* Image Height = 427 pixels
* Focal Plane X-Resolution = 3504000/885 = 3959.32
* Focal Plane Y-Resolution = 2336000/590 = 3959.32
* Focal Plane X/Y-Resolution Unit = inch (2)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
182
Guests online
3,711
Total visitors
3,893

Forum statistics

Threads
591,838
Messages
17,959,836
Members
228,622
Latest member
crimedeepdives23
Back
Top