2009.03.18 Nancy Grace

Nana46 said:

I cannot believe that would have been her motive...nope, not fitting for me...she just wanted her gone period:banghead: IMO

Click to expand...

Macushla said:

Are you all telling me that NG is using that guy's blog as her source??? Oh man, haven't people here on WS discredited just about everything that he has said. NG has sunk to a new low if she is using this guys rantings - and the blog is from back in Jan. as a poster said earlier.

This is beyond silly. So much for credible journalism on NG tonight.

Click to expand...

PotatoHead said:

Editors note from source's blog:

From what source did you get this information? [Editor's note: Our information from this story came from three sources, two of whom are accurately described as being "internally close to the case" and one of whom we provide details for - a cable news legal consultant - in the story itself. One close-to-the-case source requested anonymity, but any serious journalist would consider this person to be both "connected" and reliable. The other source spoke to us "for background" only, meaning this source confirmed information and gave additional information that we agreed not to publish, but simply to use in establishing lines of questioning in interviews with other sources, including officials and their spokesmen, and to verify what the first source was telling us. Had we published certain information from this source, even in paraphrasing, the sources identity would be clear and the source's position (job) placed into peril. "Backgrounding in off the record interviews and discussions is standard journalistic procedure.]

Click to expand...

ExpectingUnicorns said:

Kathy says you can see where the pages were missing, torn out of the diary, "whole chunks."

Click to expand...

Curiousintx said:

If they have those pages then what on earth is KC doing in not taking a plea and why don't they go for the dp? This is confusing. Someone said sometimes they will wait to put the dp back on the table near trial date. Can't see why though, since then the defense will ask for a new court date.

Click to expand...

amethyst221 said:

Why is KB participating in this? It was a lot of talking, but so nebulous about where the report came from. It sure didn't say anything about parties close to the investigation, etc.

Click to expand...

cyberborg said:

Strange that WFTV has nothing posted on the story and KB is breaking this on NG?

There was news today of some discovery release but did not mention missing diary pages, I don't think.

Sounds like it could be sourced from this blog or the same source as the blog?

Click to expand...

trafficsUP66 said:

Is it possible that some docs have been released to the defense therefore, some media has the info?

Any chance they have it but have not posted yet?

Click to expand...

CarolinaMoon said:

I can't believe they would run with that particular source unless it was confirmed twelve ways from Sunday. Same goes for Kathy Belich.

Guess we'll have to wait and see!

:banghead::banghead::banghead:

Click to expand...

sua_sponte said:

Yep, that whole segment was just a couple of friends gossiping and speculating over unsubstantiated rumors.

How much do you want to bet that when this "diary" rumor is debunked, Nancy will talk about how it was "trumped up" on websleuths?

Click to expand...

JSR said:

I too don't believe that Kathy B would report on such a find unless verified by multiple sources. I don't have the same feeling about NG's peeps but KB seems to be a good reporter.

Click to expand...