Dear Prudence
New Member
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2009
- Messages
- 2,088
- Reaction score
- 2
What specific lies in the filing does he mean? Blah, I have to go back and read it. I forget.
I think this may be the lies BC is referring to:
11. Additionally,TES counsel acknowledges that he allowed another lawyer, not part of the defense team, to review all of the documents at this leisure. Interestingly enough, that lawyer now represents the parents of the Defendant, who were previously represented byTES counsel, for whatever purposes, primarily related solely to media appearances. There were no issues of privacy raised then; no indications that that lawyer was restricted from having copies or making notes; no indications that that lawyer had to pay cash in advance to look at the files. Where is the "bad faith" now?
and this:
13. What is more disturbing is that he has used his position with Texas Equusearch to compel his former clients to sign a waiver of conflict in exchange for their new lawyer reviewing the Equusearch documents. Exhibit "B". This can under no
circumstances be considered a knowing and voluntary waiver.
snipped from this motion http://www.ninthcircuit.org/news/Hi...ication for Subpoena Duces Tecum 8-9-2010.pdf