scriptgirl
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2009
- Messages
- 1,565
- Reaction score
- 501
Glad the drama is gone-keep us updated!
A distinct possibilty(Wish could say ive never been there back in the day)Oh and BTW....one time, when I was staying in a very remote part of Montana, I went outside to ready my stuff (hunting) at around 4am....out on the main dirt road ("main" meaning the only road that cut through this area - believe me, not much traffic even during the day), a pickup driving at a good clip, stopped short a few yards down from our cabin, got out - vomited and got back into his truck to keep going. Many guys drink long and hard on weekend nights only to hightail it off to the ranch where they work without stopping home with distances being huge from one ranch to another.....just a little something that might explain George's movements that early.
Lonnie was not a large boy from what ive been told even for twelve.Interesting thread and good sleuthing. I have a question that popped into my mind while reading the newpaper article [first one]. Is there an autopsy report that can be obtained? Particularly Lonnie's fingers; were there particles of debris that contained dirt or leaves, grasses or seeds? If not, was he detained in the trunk of a car or the back of a pickup while bound? Was there any indication of animal remains or fur/hide? Was he contained in a pen of some sort that would cause his fingers to have wood fragments imbedded in them? If he was frantically scraping with his hands this suggests imprisonment.
Is there any indication of Lonnie's physicality? Was he a tall 12 year old or slight in build? That his hands were bound and he was blindfolded suggests, to me, that the perp needed to contain him. If it were a larger man and Lonnie was slightly built there would be no need for the hand binding, Lonnie could be easily controlled. The need to do that could also show that it was a 'mental exercise' by the killer; a mind game to induce more terror, as if more were needed.
Thats O.K. ...I knew who you meant!Sorry - I was identifying the man as "George Wood" when I should have been saying Orrin Woods! I don't know where I got "George" from....:waitasec:
Sept. 27, 1951: Body of Child Found In Woods
http://news.google.com/newspapers?n...-VXAAAAIBAJ&sjid=OvYDAAAAIBAJ&pg=4236,4275719