butwhatif?
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2008
- Messages
- 3,598
- Reaction score
- 40
Okay, back to Kiesha and my hunt for what was seized from the unit in the beginning.....
Back in thread 1, I posted about what was said on the news about items being taken...
"Channel 7 news just reported a vacuum and paperwork have been siezed from the home.
Another report said units door had been siezed for forensic testing".(channel 9)
Then the next day, I found a link to back up that info which I posted...
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/na...on-of-girls-body/story-e6frf7l6-1225901863985
But when you click on that link now, there is no mention of the items seized. :waitasec:
Nursebeeme posted another link a short time later that including the same info, but worded slightly differently.
http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/n...-1225902309714
At first I thought I must have gotten my links mixed up, but since the wording is different, those details must have been removed from the original article I posted.
WHY? :waitasec:
I'm still trying to figure out why Kiesha's mattress wasn't one of the first items to be collected for testing, and wasn't taken until new (but unknown to the public) allegations were made, which police said were significant to the case.
Why would they remove a vacuum cleaner before the mattress in her room that she was allegedly taken from?
Back in thread 1, I posted about what was said on the news about items being taken...
"Channel 7 news just reported a vacuum and paperwork have been siezed from the home.
Another report said units door had been siezed for forensic testing".(channel 9)
Then the next day, I found a link to back up that info which I posted...
Police confirmed they seized a vacuum cleaner, a computer and clothing from Mr Smith and Ms Abrahams' house.
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/na...on-of-girls-body/story-e6frf7l6-1225901863985
But when you click on that link now, there is no mention of the items seized. :waitasec:
Nursebeeme posted another link a short time later that including the same info, but worded slightly differently.
Police last night confirmed they seized a vacuum cleaner, a computer and clothing from Mr Smith and Ms Abrahams' house for forensic testing.
http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/n...-1225902309714
At first I thought I must have gotten my links mixed up, but since the wording is different, those details must have been removed from the original article I posted.
WHY? :waitasec:
I'm still trying to figure out why Kiesha's mattress wasn't one of the first items to be collected for testing, and wasn't taken until new (but unknown to the public) allegations were made, which police said were significant to the case.
Why would they remove a vacuum cleaner before the mattress in her room that she was allegedly taken from?