Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Speaking of the good Judge (and contempt of court)...does anyone know if the defense filed their witness list?
Well, I am not sure that this is going to go over well, but I will give it a shot. To my own horror, I find myself defending - up to a point- the defense. I know, I know, they have been idiots in a number of ways. However, having said that; their witnesses could not do their work or finish their work or even start their work until they KNEW what they were going to be working on. I will be the first to admit that I do not remember when the first scientific evidence started being released to the public. Let's take the autopsy report as an example. When was the final report released? Until that report was released the defense did not know EXACTLY what kind of experts they would need - aside from the obvious second opinion on the autopsy itself - until they knew what the report contained. Their plant specialist, trace evidence specialist, etc. Am I making myself understood enough here? Their experts could not get started until the State turned over evidence for them to examine and report on.
Do I think the defense delayed on purpose? Yes, I do, but we have to give their experts a little slack because their work only began when the State released the evidence and reports to them.
Nope, not on the clerk's site yet! They've still got 10 minutes though. :angel:
Oh, the horror.
Good point Macushla, and I agree with you - about the experts.
But there are PLENTY of other non-expert people that they could have been interviewing and/or deposing in the meantime. Ones whose interviews were released long, long ago.
Like this latest request today, where they're asking for 8 transcripts, on the taxpayers dime. I don't have the doc yet so I don't know who they're asking for, but if it's a non-expert, I'm gonna be PO'd again. :furious:
I'm probably going to be getting PO'd lots of times over the next year. Might as well get used to it. heh
.
Oh, the horror.
Good point Macushla, and I agree with you - about the experts.
But there are PLENTY of other non-expert people that they could have been interviewing and/or deposing in the meantime. Ones whose interviews were released long, long ago.
Like this latest request today, where they're asking for 8 transcripts, on the taxpayers dime. I don't have the doc yet so I don't know who they're asking for, but if it's a non-expert, I'm gonna be PO'd again. :furious:
I'm probably going to be getting PO'd lots of times over the next year. Might as well get used to it. heh
.
I just do not understand how or why the defense continiually can getaway with breaking the rules here. According to the response the defense is WAY, WAY past the allotted 15 days allowed for reciprocating in discovery! In fact we looking back at January 2009.
Knowing that HHJP has zero tolerance for foolishness and has the utmost repect for judicial expediency I am wondering how long before he will grant or deny the SA's request for a hearing on this matter? It also seems like it is going to definitely be time for Baez et al to put up or shut up.
I think you're gonna be PO'd - so many depositions scheduled now that could have been done a loooong time ago . . .
After looking at their depo schedule -
YES, I AM PO'D.....
Brian B? Debbi B? JP Chatt? Nathan L? the Grunds? and many more... so many that could and SHOULD have been done long ago. :furious::furious::furious:
Clearly, the taxpayers need an accounting of what they spent that $163,000 on. Because it SURE doesn't look like it was on this case.
Can the tax payers of FL file a motion to see exactly how that money was spent?
Gee in TWO years a lot can happen..
People can move.
People can die.
People can suffer severe health complications, drug addictions, or accidents which affect their memory.
People can simply FORGET small details that may not have been a big deal to them, but a HUGE deal in the impact of this case.
KC should be infuriated with her defense. But she's in lala land.
After looking at their depo schedule -
YES, I AM PO'D.....
Brian B? Debbi B? JP Chatt? Nathan L? the Grunds? and many more... so many that could and SHOULD have been done long ago. :furious::furious::furious:
Clearly, the taxpayers need an accounting of what they spent that $163,000 on. Because it SURE doesn't look like it was on this case.