This is my very first thread and trust me I take everything I read from the Enquireer with a grain of salt but it does offer a little insight into why the SA is requesting a closed door meeting
http://www.nationalenquirer.com/case4t_anthony_caylee_murder_kronk_confession/celebrity/68203
I really wonder if this rings true??? If it did would that mean that they recovered the info from listening in on Client/Attorney meeting? Is that admissable?
http://www.nationalenquirer.com/case4t_anthony_caylee_murder_kronk_confession/celebrity/68203
I really wonder if this rings true??? If it did would that mean that they recovered the info from listening in on Client/Attorney meeting? Is that admissable?