REVISIT Caylee's biological father/Reverse DNA Profile**MERGED**

New Posts

Status
Not open for further replies.
Landonsmom02 said:
After looking at the side by side pic of JPC and Caylee I would have to agree they look alot alike. I think if the biodad was someone with money,power etc. you can best believe KC was not going to go quietly. She loves attention and would have wanted the child support checks. I think that she really doesn't know herself because she was getting it on with alot of people.IMO

Here is a link for you to look at the picture of JPC and there are also more guys on here that came in contact with KC at one point that have the possibility of being the father.

http://itsamysterytome.wordpress.com/2009/04/16/who-is-caylee-anthonys-father/
Click to expand...

OMG, I almost fell out of my chair! He looks exactly like Caylee!!!!! Same cheek bones and everything! So did LE ever try to test him or anything? I feel this is a very important part of the case.
 
Landonsmom02 said:
After looking at the side by side pic of JPC and Caylee I would have to agree they look alot alike. I think if the biodad was someone with money,power etc. you can best believe KC was not going to go quietly. She loves attention and would have wanted the child support checks. I think that she really doesn't know herself because she was getting it on with alot of people.IMO

Here is a link for you to look at the picture of JPC and there are also more guys on here that came in contact with KC at one point that have the possibility of being the father.

http://itsamysterytome.wordpress.com/2009/04/16/who-is-caylee-anthonys-father/
Click to expand...

IMO, IF any of this came to pass, we really DO NOT know what type of one- time take it or leave it offer may have been made to the Anthony family by the paternal family.. Much money AND INFLUENCE is present in the family referenced.
IF it was a cash basis, under the table one time payment from the paternal family should this family be the paternal family, then it would be very hard to prove.

From what I know about GA and CA, I believe they would have jumped on a cushy cash settlement offer and then wanted to raise Caylee just as they were doing. IMO.
 
kpalma715 said:
OMG, I almost fell out of my chair! He looks exactly like Caylee!!!!! Same cheek bones and everything! So did LE ever try to test him or anything? I feel this is a very important part of the case.
Click to expand...

If he was ever tested, it is not public knowledge.
 
Let's say the late EB is the father of Caylee. If we can't test his DNA, couldn't his siblings or parents have their DNA tested, and wouldn't there be a link to Casey? Wouldn't there be a percentage of a chance that the child is the grandchild or niece of those tested?

Can't DNA show "other" family relationships other than parents/children/siblings?
 
SeekingJana said:
IMO, IF any of this came to pass, we really DO NOT know what type of one- time take it or leave it offer may have been made to the Anthony family by the paternal family.. Much money AND INFLUENCE is present in the family referenced.
IF it was a cash basis, under the table one time payment from the paternal family should this family be the paternal family, then it would be very hard to prove.

From what I know about GA and CA, I believe they would have jumped on a cushy cash settlement offer and then wanted to raise Caylee just as they were doing. IMO.
Click to expand...

I've thought about that too. In one jail visit KC told CA and GA that she had talked to psychologists and then quickly said "Don't worry I didn't say anything". That would also explain why CA never did anything when KC stole from her. At one time CA told LE that they had signed a contract with the father that the A's would have sole guardianship of Caylee. When LE talked to the A's attorney, he said he never drew up the contract.
 
Important to remember here that EVERYONE in that family lies, and they admit it. None lie as thoroughly as Casey. IF SHE KNOWS who the father is, I doubt she had even told him. She had so many sexual partners, I really doubt she knows. Too bad though, because Caylee was such a wonderful, bright, innocent child.
 
oh_gal said:
Let's say the late EB is the father of Caylee. Obviously, we can't test his DNA if he's deceased, but couldn't his siblings or parents have their DNA tested, and wouldn't there be a link to Casey? Wouldn't there be a percentage of a chance that the child is the grandchild or niece of those tested?

Can't DNA show "other" family relationships other than parents/children/siblings?
Click to expand...

Yes, other family could be tested and paternity established from that with a high degree of certainty.
 
3doglady said:
I've thought about that too. In one jail visit KC told CA and GA that she had talked to psychologists and then quickly said "Don't worry I didn't say anything". That would also explain why CA never did anything when KC stole from her. At one time CA told LE that they had signed a contract with the father that the A's would have sole guardianship of Caylee. When LE talked to the A's attorney, he said he never drew up the contract.
Click to expand...

IF that happened do you really think it would have stayed hiddened for the last 3 years? I mean ICA is throwing everyone under the bus and she would surely have said something about this. I can hear it already "CA and GA were paid off from biodad so they could raise Caylee and I never got any money so that's why I lied about my job and stole from my family and friends".:rolleyes: If they really knew it would have came out by now.He would be under those wheels also. CA and GA tried protecting ICA and with all they have been through because of her they would have said something if they thought it would help ICA. IMO
 
oh_gal said:
Let's say the late EB is the father of Caylee. Obviously, we can't test his DNA if he's deceased, but couldn't his siblings or parents have their DNA tested, and wouldn't there be a link to Casey?

Can't DNA show "other" family relationships other than parents/children/siblings?
Click to expand...


:truce: Here's information regarding differing DNA testing protocols:


[ame="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genealogical_DNA_test"]Genealogical DNA test - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia@@AMEPARAM@@/wiki/File:Dna-SNP.svg" class="image"><img alt="" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/2e/Dna-SNP.svg/250px-Dna-SNP.svg.png"@@AMEPARAM@@commons/thumb/2/2e/Dna-SNP.svg/250px-Dna-SNP.svg.png[/ame]


Within that information cited above is the fact that reverse profiling can be performed using the exemplars of blood related family members, ie Father & Mother to achieve a statistical % of the decedent and siblings to increase the statistical %.

For example if the CHILD in question had elephants @ loci 10, and zebras @ loci 11 and the child's maternal donor DID NOT have elephants or zebras at either loci BUT BOTH of the parents above and MOST of he Siblings ABOVE had elephants & zebras at the defined loci, then the % probability is elevated as to the decedent as a spermatozoa donor. Naturally, more than 2 loci are tested but this is a hypothetical.

SHORT ANSWER: Reverse DNA CAN be used to r/o a donor to link to Caylee.:innocent:

If it was performed in this case, no RELEASED records exist, IIRC and since DNA testing is expensive( NO they do NOT used home paternity testing kits!) http://www.dnacenter.com/?utm_source=Adcenter&utm_medium=PPC&utm_campaign=Adcenter, somebody with a NEED for this information would have to pay. :innocent:
 
So....why don't they find Eric's family members, and do that?
 
oh_gal said:
Let's say the late EB is the father of Caylee. Obviously, we can't test his DNA if he's deceased, but couldn't his siblings or parents have their DNA tested, and wouldn't there be a link to Casey? Wouldn't there be a percentage of a chance that the child is the grandchild or niece of those tested?

Can't DNA show "other" family relationships other than parents/children/siblings?
Click to expand...

Yes, DNA from the father's family members could establish parentage.

But those family members have to be willing to take that test. Without some kind of legal subpoena, based on some kind of evidence to get a warrant to force them if they refuse, they don't have to come forward. Unless identifying the father is important to this case, or some legal case, there's no reason for a judge to sign a warrant out of some kind of curiosity.

Now imagine that the father or family of the father do not know that Caylee is their relation; imagine one or more might have a suspicion, but want nothing to do with this case, the Anthonys, and certainly not Casey or the media blitz they'd face if they came forward, even if it turned out they weren't related.

Since the child is dead and there's nothing they can do for her now, I would be surprised anyone would want that kind of notoriety. What's the upside for them?

Well, others probably can answer this better than I, but that's my thoughts on it.
 
I haven't read this entire thread, so please forgive me if someone has already mentioned this. I recall reading about JPC on other websites very early in the case. Plenty of folks thought that Caylee looked just like the guy and were convinced that he fathered the child. IIRC, this guy's family was very well-off, and I doubt very much that the Anthonys wouldn't have insisted on having JPC pay child support since his family obviously had the means to do so. Unless there was some under-the-table pay-off to get him off the hook for continued child support, I would exclude JPC as being Caylee's father. jmo
 
KoldKase said:
Yes, DNA from the father's family members could establish parentage.

But those family members have to be willing to take that test. Without some kind of legal subpoena, based on some kind of evidence to get a warrant to force them if they refuse, they don't have to come forward. Unless identifying the father is important to this case, or some legal case, there's no reason for a judge to sign a warrant out of some kind of curiosity.

Now imagine that the father or family of the father do not know that Caylee is their relation; imagine one or more might have a suspicion, but want nothing to do with this case, the Anthonys, and certainly not Casey or the media blitz they'd face if they came forward, even if it turned out they weren't related.

Since the child is dead and there's nothing they can do for her now, I would be surprised anyone would want that kind of notoriety. What's the upside for them?

Well, others probably can answer this better than I, but that's my thoughts on it.
Click to expand...

Probaby 9 out of 10 people, if they found out their son was the father of Caylee, wouldn't step forward for the reasons you listed.

There might be a few, though, who would like to give this little girl's life a degree of validation (and maybe that's not the best word to use, but my tired brain is failing me right now), by stepping up and saying, "yes, we are your family, too".

At any rate, it must not be that important to either side, since no one has requested any type of testing, aside from testing Lee, as far as I know.
 
Landonsmom02 said:
IF that happened do you really think it would have stayed hiddened for the last 3 years? I mean ICA is throwing everyone under the bus and she would surely have said something about this. I can hear it already "CA and GA were paid off from biodad so they could raise Caylee and I never got any money so that's why I lied about my job and stole from my family and friends".:rolleyes: If they really knew it would have came out by now.He would be under those wheels also. CA and GA tried protecting ICA and with all they have been through because of her they would have said something if they thought it would help ICA. IMO
Click to expand...

I agree it's far fetched but so are a lot of things that have happened in this case. The whole family lies so much anything is possible. Why did CA tell LE that they signed a contract with the bio dad? KC is on trial for murder not theft and she wants the jury to think she lied because of incest so telling about bio dad would defeat her defense. If they did sign a confidentiality contract for money they aren't going to tell. As KC said "Don't worry I didn't tell". I'm not necessarily applying this theory to JPC it could have been anyone, and it is just a theory. I also read that KC did not meet JPC until 2007 but then another friend said that was not correct. I think it's more likely that KC doesn't know. JMO
 
I can't really see what the interest in this is. Even if the father could be identified, what good would it do??? It would just ruin the life of another innocent bystander in this whole sordid mess one ICA has created.
 
celticthyme said:
Important to remember here that EVERYONE in that family lies, and they admit it. None lie as thoroughly as Casey. IF SHE KNOWS who the father is, I doubt she had even told him. She had so many sexual partners, I really doubt she knows. Too bad though, because Caylee was such a wonderful, bright, innocent child.
Click to expand...
BBM
From early on, I believed and still do that Casey absolutely knows who the father is. She may have had many sexual partners after she had Caylee, but I suspect not so many prior. And I certainly don't believe they were anonymous sexual partners. So yes...she knows. IMO. Now, whether the State knows is another matter, but I suspect they do. They know so much more than we will ever know. Again, MOO.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

DNASolves

Who is Escambia County John Doe (1989)?

Members online

... and 185 more.
Total: 3,320 (members: 186, guests: 3,134)

Online statistics

Members online
186
Guests online
3,134
Total visitors
3,320
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
592,171
Messages
17,964,574
Members
228,712
Latest member
Lover305
Back
Top