Steely Dan
Former Member
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2008
- Messages
- 30,558
- Reaction score
- 107
All quotes from the courtroom are approx.
We learned that JB whines more than a 2 year old with a toothache.
JB: The problem is Judge, we cannot reopen our case.
It seems JB is under the impression that the prosecution gets to put on their case, the defense can then put on their case and load it with liars, but the prosecution never gets a chance to rebut those lies. :banghead:
HHJBP: On one hand you say it is all a big surprise to you and on the other hand I say you can take their depositions.
HHJBP: If you need extra time to take these depositions, you can have it. We will take all the time you need for this, but we'll be here Saturday, Sunday, Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday.
JB is on HHJBP's last nerve and that JB's problem with the forensic anthropologists report. He is saying, if IIRC, that the forensic anthropologist the state called made no mention of the "brain dust" in his report and therefore shouldn't be allowed to rebut Dr. Spitz's testimony.
JA is saying that the state isn't calling Dr. Goldberger (the forensic anthropologist) to say anything about brain dust but that there was no residue in the skull of anything. (Somebody please correct me if I'm wrong about that.)
HHJBP (Responding to JB's assertion that what the prosecution is going to rebut was never in the prosecution's witness' report. JA says it is.) "This better be a real problem and not an imaginary problem because if I read that report and find it in there...(nothing more said.)
This is from BritsKate;
JA: Goldberger has produced report regarding cranial wash to rebut Dr. Spitz's testimony. No organic material was found. Considered a sub-opinion. Goldberger is also listed as a defense witness. Opening skull is not protocol for anthropological exam (HA! I knew it!)
JB believes a toxicologist can't testify to whether something is organic or inorganic.
The trial is in recess indefinitely. I think that means that as soon as the lawyers are done taking depositions that they will call the jury back. When that will happen who knows? It could be later today from what I get from HHJBP's comments.
We learned that JB whines more than a 2 year old with a toothache.
JB: The problem is Judge, we cannot reopen our case.
It seems JB is under the impression that the prosecution gets to put on their case, the defense can then put on their case and load it with liars, but the prosecution never gets a chance to rebut those lies. :banghead:
HHJBP: On one hand you say it is all a big surprise to you and on the other hand I say you can take their depositions.
HHJBP: If you need extra time to take these depositions, you can have it. We will take all the time you need for this, but we'll be here Saturday, Sunday, Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday.
JB is on HHJBP's last nerve and that JB's problem with the forensic anthropologists report. He is saying, if IIRC, that the forensic anthropologist the state called made no mention of the "brain dust" in his report and therefore shouldn't be allowed to rebut Dr. Spitz's testimony.
JA is saying that the state isn't calling Dr. Goldberger (the forensic anthropologist) to say anything about brain dust but that there was no residue in the skull of anything. (Somebody please correct me if I'm wrong about that.)
HHJBP (Responding to JB's assertion that what the prosecution is going to rebut was never in the prosecution's witness' report. JA says it is.) "This better be a real problem and not an imaginary problem because if I read that report and find it in there...(nothing more said.)
This is from BritsKate;
JA: Goldberger has produced report regarding cranial wash to rebut Dr. Spitz's testimony. No organic material was found. Considered a sub-opinion. Goldberger is also listed as a defense witness. Opening skull is not protocol for anthropological exam (HA! I knew it!)
JB believes a toxicologist can't testify to whether something is organic or inorganic.
The trial is in recess indefinitely. I think that means that as soon as the lawyers are done taking depositions that they will call the jury back. When that will happen who knows? It could be later today from what I get from HHJBP's comments.