Wouldn't it be shocking if the judge didn't allow this?
I keep hoping he remembered to put a "Not a big fan of Boz" interest on his facebook page.
This guy seems top notch.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wouldn't it be shocking if the judge didn't allow this?
He has no reason not to be. This testimony won't make it into the trial. No sense getting worked up or attacking the witness.
I really like this man. He is genuine and well versed in his specialty. Not a grand-stander like JW was.
Why do you think it won't be let in? Seems so unfair not to. This could really "set BC free."
This expert's opinion was not that the hacking occurred via the VPN. He just said that was one of the mistakes that the CPD made. Allowing it to be connected to the VPN, and automatic functions changed files. He didn't say that's where the tampering came from.
Well there ya go. BII. I guess the defense can rest now. Glad to be on the ground now.
Gessner has already ruled on this. This is for appeal only. I wonder if Gessner is regretting that decision at this point.
Why do you think it won't be let in? Seems so unfair not to. This could really "set BC free."
Come on, Boz. You can DO this. Ask just one wrong question so the judge can (at his discretion) allow this back into the defense.
Come on......
Regardless, the evidence was tampered with. The deleted Google maps cookie was a faked file. The state of the files changed after being taken into possession of LE and before any forensic examination. The evidence has no integrity. That's the bottom line.