GUILTY GA - Lauren Giddings, 27, Macon, 26 June 2011 #12

New Posts

Status
Not open for further replies.
Leak theory is interesting, maybe Winters is setting the table for seeking the death penalty - Key concept here is that the murder was "outrageously or wantonly vile, horrible, or inhumane, and that [it] involved depravity of mind by the perpetrator." Her DNA was found on the "undergarments" , so I am assuming he did not just sneak them out of her dresser drawer during one of his break-ins to her apartment. Perhaps he took them off her dead body before or after engaging in a little necrophilia ?
 
AgentFrankLundy said:
Leak theory is interesting, maybe Winters is setting the table for seeking the death penalty - Key concept here is that the murder was "outrageously or wantonly vile, horrible, or inhumane, and that [it] involved depravity of mind by the perpetrator." Her DNA was found on the "undergarments" , so I am assuming he did not just sneak them out of her dresser drawer during one of his break-ins to her apartment. Perhaps he took them off her dead body before or after engaging in a little necrophilia ?
Click to expand...

BBM: He could have taken them out of the dirty clothes hamper though. :/
 
bessie said:
Sickening, but can't say I'm surprised. Poor Lauren. She mentioned Macon "hoodlums" in that e-mail to her bf, but I wonder if that wasn't a cover. I mean, was it actually McD she feared? Did she try to brush it off and tell herself she was imagining things? From all we've learned about Lauren, I think she was too astute not to pick up on the vibes that were probably coming through the walls! She must've known and was probably counting the hours until she would be out of there. :(
Click to expand...

bessie, I still go 'round and 'round about that email...

Early on, everyone wondered if it was written by the perp.

It could be, in its entirety, written by Lauren, and with no hidden meanings, no outside interference.

Or your theory in your post above might fit.

Or -- if the email was as detailed as the article we had from The Washington Post indicated it was...
(and here's the link again, for anyone who missed that article: http://www.washingtonpost.com/local...to-heartache/2011/08/05/gIQAj47IzI_story.html )
...then couldn't it be that Lauren took some time composing it and it was still on her computer, not sent, when she was attacked ... and the perp may have made some changes or additions? ETA: And maybe even have held off and then sent with timing that would throw off the real timeline?

It's always seemed to me that it just "must" hold some kind of clue. But of course, it may not -- it may be important only (and so sadly) in that it was Lauren's last email ...
 
MaconMom said:
BBM: He could have taken them out of the dirty clothes hamper though. :/
Click to expand...

That's very true. Also -- I really don't know -- would just a regular washing remove all the owner's DNA, to the point that none could be detected, or degrade it so that it couldn't be identified? (My point being that, possibly, they also could have come straight from her lingerie drawer...)
 
Backwoods said:
That's very true. Also -- I really don't know -- would just a regular washing remove all the owner's DNA, to the point that none could be detected, or degrade it so that it couldn't be identified? (My point being that, possibly, they also could have come straight from her lingerie drawer...)
Click to expand...

BBM: I did a little Googling, and I think the answer is "it depends". Check out this page which is the clearest answer I was able to find:

http://www.leelofland.com/wordpress/?p=489

The man who writes this blog is a police investigator. He states "Dry cleaning won’t destroy DNA. However, it may remove it from the clothing. The same is true for a washing machine, it doesn’t destroy DNA, but it may rinse it away. The DNA will be squeaky clean, too.". Based on this and other pages I looked at, whether or not washing the garment would remove DNA can depend on factors like how hot the water was and if bleach was used. Not to be gross but underwear could probably have quite a bit of DNA on it, so it might stay in the fibers better when washed more so than something like a shirt or pants. Sounds like it could be from either clean or dirty undergarments, but my guess is the latter just because SMD is such a creeper.

Again, I am not a DNA expert at all so I have no clue. Just relating what I found on Google. :)
 
DNA can be extracted from traces on blood on laundered clothing, so I think the same would be true of other bodily secretions that contain protein. Coincidentally, I was just reading this last night in relation to another case, and still had it opened in a tab on my browser. It's from a 2002 State of Texas Attorney General's Office News Release. Totally unrelated to this case, but just noting for reference.

Blood traces from Mays' laundered clothing revealed DNA that linked to the victims' DNA.
https://www.oag.state.tx.us/newspubs/newsarchive/2002/20020919factsmays.htm

Laundered or not, it appears that the panties found in McD's apartment did contain Lauren's DNA. Whether or not the DNA could have been taken from laundered panties is relevant because if so, and the panties were in fact clean, it suggests that McD's obsession had reached a dangerous level before Lauren was murdered (unless you choose to believe he stole the panties from her drawer after he killed her). Laundered or not, I'm willing to bet he stole them at a time prior to the murder.
 
It's possible that SMD took the panties from the laundry room while Lauren's clothes were being washed. I'm assuming she didn't have a washer and dryer in her apartment. We know he could have accessed her apartment at any time, but that doesn't mean the panties were taken from her apartment.

I can picture the defense saying the panties must have gotten mixed in with his laundry, or something along those lines. I guess it would matter if they were clean or not in that case. I'm also curious to know where in his apartment they were found - as in, did he have them hidden away somewhere? Obviously he never expected his apartment to be searched.

I think I read in the Lisa Irwin forum about bodies giving off decomposition chemicals immediately following death. I'm probably using the wrong terminology but.. is there a way that it could be determined that Lauren was wearing the underwear at the time of death? If human remains dogs can smell decomposition in carpet, could they also smell it in clothing?
 
MaconMom said:
It's possible that SMD took the panties from the laundry room while Lauren's clothes were being washed. I'm assuming she didn't have a washer and dryer in her apartment. We know he could have accessed her apartment at any time, but that doesn't mean the panties were taken from her apartment.

I can picture the defense saying the panties must have gotten mixed in with his laundry, or something along those lines. I guess it would matter if they were clean or not in that case. I'm also curious to know where in his apartment they were found - as in, did he have them hidden away somewhere? Obviously he never expected his apartment to be searched.

I think I read in the Lisa Irwin forum about bodies giving off decomposition chemicals immediately following death. I'm probably using the wrong terminology but.. is there a way that it could be determined that Lauren was wearing the underwear at the time of death? If human remains dogs can smell decomposition in carpet, could they also smell it in clothing?
Click to expand...
He probably kept them in the same place he kept the stolen condoms. But I agree, MaconMom, Buford will say they were left behind in the dryer and got mixed up with McD's clothes or some such nonsense. The same way the 30 CP images crept onto his flash drive without his knowledge. Better yet, the "real killer" planted the underwear in his apartment right after he cut the grass at midnight, which McD didn't hear because he can sleep through "anything" except a guy standing outside his neighbor's door. You know, the same guy who picked up McD's hacksaw from the trash in the spring and used it to dismember Lauren's body two months later. I'll bet that guy was following McD online and carried out the murder and dismemberment in such a way as to directly resemble the directions in McD's posts. Or maybe it really was a zombie invastion after all. I dunno... :mad:
 
Backwoods said:
bessie, I still go 'round and 'round about that email...

Early on, everyone wondered if it was written by the perp.

It could be, in its entirety, written by Lauren, and with no hidden meanings, no outside interference.

Or your theory in your post above might fit.

Or -- if the email was as detailed as the article we had from The Washington Post indicated it was...
(and here's the link again, for anyone who missed that article: http://www.washingtonpost.com/local...to-heartache/2011/08/05/gIQAj47IzI_story.html )
...then couldn't it be that Lauren took some time composing it and it was still on her computer, not sent, when she was attacked ... and the perp may have made some changes or additions? ETA: And maybe even have held off and then sent with timing that would throw off the real timeline?

It's always seemed to me that it just "must" hold some kind of clue. But of course, it may not -- it may be important only (and so sadly) in that it was Lauren's last email ...
Click to expand...
I suppose that's possible, Backwoods. Without seeing it and not knowing Lauren's writing style, it's hard to say. The Washington Post article makes it sound like she was writing from an emotional level, or in a stream of consciousness. If true, it would be difficult for another person to step in and emulate her voice. I also get the impression from this article, and it could be completely off base, that the comment about the "hoodlums" came in the middle of the letter. If the perp interjected that part into what she had already written, then I'd think there would be a noticeable break. On the other hand, the article does say it was "in passing", like an "oh, by the way" comment. As for timing, computer forensics will show how much time lapsed from when she started writing and when the e-mail was finally transmitted. So there might be a clue there. I'd think some of that information will eventually be made public during the trial, if there is one.
 
MaconMom said:
I think I read in the Lisa Irwin forum about bodies giving off decomposition chemicals immediately following death. I'm probably using the wrong terminology but.. is there a way that it could be determined that Lauren was wearing the underwear at the time of death? If human remains dogs can smell decomposition in carpet, could they also smell it in clothing?
Click to expand...

Sorry, I forgot to answer this earlier. Yes, the scent of decomp that occurs almost immediately after death is discernable to HRD dogs on a victim's clothing. So if LG was wearing the panties when she died, and the panties were in McD's apartment, the dogs could've hit on them during the search.
 
November 23, 2011

Sources: Lauren Giddings' Garment found in McDaniel's Apartment
By AMY LEIGH WOMACK and JOE KOVAC JR. - Telegraph staff

Potential evidence in the Lauren Giddings slaying investigation sent to an FBI lab includes a pair of the victim’s underwear discovered in her suspected killer’s apartment, sources familiar with the investigation say.
The panties found in a search of Stephen Mark McDaniel’s apartment bear Giddings’ DNA, a source close to the case said Tuesday.

DA Won't Comment on Giddings Evidence

Bibb County's District Attorney says he won't comment on a report that authorities found a pair of Lauren Giddings' panties in her accused killer's next-door apartment.

Asked about the newspaper report, District Attorney Greg Winters declined comment. In a text reply to 13WMAZ's Randall Savage, Winters wrote, "No comment. Not very happy that information was leaked."
 
MaconMom said:
is there a way that it could be determined that Lauren was wearing the underwear at the time of death? If human remains dogs can smell decomposition in carpet, could they also smell it in clothing?
Click to expand...
BBM and respectfully snipped for space:
Yes.

Also, something I thought of- not sure if it is true for forensic analysis of DNA in a lab environment, but we can only extract DNA for scent training (in dogs) from white blood cells.

I wonder if this is how it works in the lab?
 
For MaconMom and anyone else who might've missed it, Oriah and Sarx answered quite a few questions for us about SAR and HRD dogs in the first several pages of the previous thread starting at the beginning of the second page (09/01/11, 4:39 am):

http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=148296&page=12

The other day I copied some of them to the "K-9 SAR Question and Answer" thread in our Websleuths Resources forum.

K9 SAR Questions & Answers - Ask the Pros! - Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community


Happy Thanksgiving, everyone!
 
from Macon television station FOX24's web site:

QUOTE:

Bibb D.A. & Defense Attorney Buford React on Giddings Evidence Leak

... Bibb County District Attorney Greg Winters says he wishes it had not been released, but says it will not have any effect on the evidence available for trial. The reports remain unconfirmed including the fact that the supposed under garment found in McDaniel's apartment has Giddings' DNA. ...

read more at: http://www.newscentralga.com/news/l...eact-on-Giddings-Evidence-Leak-134424378.html
 
wow, I think we missed THIS one from FOX24:

QUOTE:

FOX FOCUS: DA Greg Winters On Giddings Homicide Case

NewsCentral's Linnie Supall sits down with District Attorney Greg Winters to discuss the indictment of Stephen McDaniel for the murder of Mercer Law School graduate, Lauren Giddings.

http://www.newscentralga.com/news/f...ters-On-Giddings-Homicide-Case-133930603.html

ETA: Of course, since this is from Nov. 15, we now know that the bond hearing discussed in the interview was cancelled.

Also, want to add this link, which is to the station's newscast coverage (also on the 15th) of the indictment. Thought we looked at this, but maybe it was updated...? (Or maybe I missed the video portion first time around.) Anyhow, it now includes portions, but not all, of the above interview, plus. (Apologies if this is a repeat.)

QUOTE:
McDaniel Indicted for Murder of Mercer Law Grad

read and view at: http://www.newscentralga.com/news/l...-for-Murder-of-Mercer-Law-Grad-133930543.html
 
bessie said:
He probably kept them in the same place he kept the stolen condoms. But I agree, MaconMom, Buford will say they were left behind in the dryer and got mixed up with McD's clothes or some such nonsense. The same way the 30 CP images crept onto his flash drive without his knowledge. Better yet, the "real killer" planted the underwear in his apartment right after he cut the grass at midnight, which McD didn't hear because he can sleep through "anything" except a guy standing outside his neighbor's door. You know, the same guy who picked up McD's hacksaw from the trash in the spring and used it to dismember Lauren's body two months later. I'll bet that guy was following McD online and carried out the murder and dismemberment in such a way as to directly resemble the directions in McD's posts. Or maybe it really was a zombie invastion after all. I dunno... :mad:
Click to expand...

What is sad is someone out there will be spreading this as gospel. However, you did make me spew. :floorlaugh:
 
AgentFrankLundy said:
Yes, there sure were a lot of "We don't know" and "I don't know" responses. Like , why even bother posting the question . I hope they will work on finding out the answers , some of them were pretty good questions:
Don't know what, if anything, was found inside McD's car.
Don't know if DA will seek death penalty
Don't know if anythings been received from the FBI
Don't know if they found chain mail in McD's apartment
Don't know if he has seen a psychiatrist
Don't know the difference between malice murder and felony murder or why GJ indictment differed from original warrant
Don't know if McD can watch TV
Don't know what Buford's Private Eye is up to or who he even is
Don't know if LE has ruled out all other persons of interest.

But , as said earlier, there will be a story on the relationship between the two , and , if I am reading between the lines correctly it sounds like old Glenda isn't quite so happy to hear her phone ring when its Amy Leigh or Joe on the other end.
Click to expand...

Same sheit, just a different day............Nothing new

As for Mama G, I wouldn't either.......Of course she doesnt' want to think her son is guilty and even if she is inclined to, she wouldn't want to talk to media, we wouldn't either probably. I dont' think she made her son a murderer, she just didnt' hone in on the key points to divert his thinking and even if he was prone to anything untowards, had she done something differently as a parent, he may have just turned out to be a pervert and not a murderer too. We as parents can't FIX everything, everyone OR our kids. We can only try. She tried in the only way SHE KNEW HOW. Some have vision, some dont'. I'm sorry, jmho

It is frustrating that she doesnt' want to admit it, but it aint my business and she's not on trial. Soon enough her son will be in jail permanent or get the death penalty. Then she'll either face it or still be in denial. What a life in store for her. Too sad.

For anyone.........about the panties........ Who leaked the panty story?? and why else would her undies be in his apt if not guilty becuase I think everyone is quite certain she wasn't having an affair with McD, and if she was, why would McD say she just vanished or whatever and then get rid of the evidence. What a dummy
 
bessie said:
Sorry, I forgot to answer this earlier. Yes, the scent of decomp that occurs almost immediately after death is discernable to HRD dogs on a victim's clothing. So if LG was wearing the panties when she died, and the panties were in McD's apartment, the dogs could've hit on them during the search.
Click to expand...

My confusion was that "decomposition" was related to decay in regards to the odor or break down of the out cells leaving traces for the scent dogs

BUT UPON further reading, (I'll post site as soon as it all loads, trouble loading for some reason) "Decomposition" , the term used (as oposed to any decomp "odor" which was in my mind, the later stages of decomp) begins 4 minutes after death occurs and is called autolysis – or self-digestion. From what I can see is that ammonia builds up in the lungs and is emitted from the nose and mouth.

You do not get the odor of decay for a while longer.

So it seems that if the LE are calling it decomposition, (in regards to scent dogs hit in McD apt) then the dogs can also dectect early decomposition or "autolyses" as opposed to decay causing odor and break down of the out cells of the body which occurs later.

I'm thinking there was no "odor" in McD apt but the dogs did hit on decomp scent. So since the torso in the trash was grossly decomposed (as it was reported there was a an odor emitting from the garbage) then I wonder which scent the dogs hit on and if her body was decaying in HIS apt, fridge or another? Could that hit be from the early stages of her death. Maybe she entered his apt as he lured her there.

Was there anything in her apt? I dont' recall that there was. ONly McD.

Just ramblings and observations.
 
tomkat said:
My confusion was that "decomposition" was related to decay in regards to the odor or break down of the out cells leaving traces for the scent dogs

BUT UPON further reading, (I'll post site as soon as it all loads, trouble loading for some reason) "Decomposition" , the term used (as oposed to any decomp "odor" which was in my mind, the later stages of decomp) begins 4 minutes after death occurs and is called autolysis – or self-digestion. From what I can see is that ammonia builds up in the lungs and is emitted from the nose and mouth.

You do not get the odor of decay for a while longer.

So it seems that if the LE are calling it decomposition, (in regards to scent dogs hit in McD apt) then the dogs can also dectect early decomposition or "autolyses" as opposed to decay causing odor and break down of the out cells of the body which occurs later.

I'm thinking there was no "odor" in McD apt but the dogs did hit on decomp scent. So since the torso in the trash was grossly decomposed (as it was reported there was a an odor emitting from the garbage) then I wonder which scent the dogs hit on and if her body was decaying in HIS apt, fridge or another? Could that hit be from the early stages of her death. Maybe she entered his apt as he lured her there.

Was there anything in her apt? I dont' recall that there was. ONly McD.

Just ramblings and observations.
Click to expand...

Also, if the autolysis is emitted from nose and mouth, does it stay in the air or can it permeate through items around it?

Also, the dogs hit on the undies but were these dogs looking for the scent of Lauren or Decomposition when those were discovered in his apt?
 
tomkat said:
Also, if the autolysis is emitted from nose and mouth, does it stay in the air or can it permeate through items around it?

Also, the dogs hit on the undies but were these dogs looking for the scent of Lauren or Decomposition when those were discovered in his apt?
Click to expand...

I'm kinda confused about the question(S)- but if you can clarify, I can probably try and explain...?

TIA.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

DNASolves

Who is Escambia County John Doe (1989)?

Members online

... and 83 more.
Total: 3,886 (members: 84, guests: 3,802)

Online statistics

Members online
84
Guests online
3,802
Total visitors
3,886
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
591,529
Messages
17,953,936
Members
228,522
Latest member
Cabinsleuth
Back
Top