rbrnmw2
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2008
- Messages
- 1,016
- Reaction score
- 8
but it does mean anyone who has access to my phone has access to those accountsThat does not mean the data is stored in plain text.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
but it does mean anyone who has access to my phone has access to those accountsThat does not mean the data is stored in plain text.
Ok...I am confused. If you have the phone and it'a already logged in, you don't need the data plain text or not. And if he was hacked some other way...well they are HACKERS........lol.
I don't know. I haven't seen his injuries or lack thereof.
I'm still waiting on that.
I do know that the initial police report says he had blood coming from his nose and the back of the head.
I'm waiting on more than that horrible video to make my mind up.
He's either a former judge or he is a retired judge, but he is a judge.
I'm sure they would not have hacked it from TM's phone. Too traceable.
If someone had his phone, they would not be able to see the plain text passwords to write down and use on a different phone or computer.
That's my understanding anyway.
my kids had to teach meWish you were near by so you can teach me..
I am still fumbeling around a lot.
Ok, I guess but if Hackers needed pass words...we wouldn't have hackers. They can come up with them with out seeing them in plain text.
You need the password to change the password, you need the secret question answers to use the forgot password function, you need the password to access the accounts from a computer (which is where the screen captures were taken from).Ok...I am confused. If you have the phone and it'a already logged in, you don't need the data plain text or not. And if he was hacked some other way...well they are HACKERS........lol.
Somebody posted a link earlier that said he wasn't a judge or former judge.
I believe it was ibnora. But I could be wrong.
We were talking about Docs theory that SPD were the hackers because they had TM's phone with the passwords but used other computers.
Do you have a sourcing for this? I know there was an issue about phone records, but not the phone itself. TIAThe police got a warrant for his phone after Mr. Martin refused to sign a consent form for them to search it.
He refused to give them the form he said because they lied to him about Zimmerman having a squeaky clean record.
There was nothing stopping them from getting a warrant for all his social accounts since what he did on that phone was so important to them they could not give it back to the family of the shooting victim to who it belonged .
Glad you are OK that is traumatic for sure.
But a nose does bleed a lot...this I do know for sure.
Somebody posted a link earlier that said he wasn't a judge or former judge.
I believe it was ibnora. But I could be wrong.
The police got a warrant for his phone after Mr. Martin refused to sign a consent form for them to search it.
He refused to give them the form he said because they lied to him about Zimmerman having a squeaky clean record.
There was nothing stopping them from getting a warrant for all his social accounts since what he did on that phone was so important to them they could not give it back to the family of the shooting victim to who it belonged .
:floorlaugh: My bad....trying to keep up while my great dane is determined he is dragging me off the couch to play.