2011.06.27 TRIAL Day Twenty-nine (Afternoon Session)

New Posts

Status
Not open for further replies.
IMO, the defense is going to drag this out with countless delays to the very end.:banghead:
 
Americka said:
JB: I'm not interested in pre-trying my case for the benefit of the prosecution. (paraphrase)

Say what? Baez's arrogance is blinding...
Click to expand...

His whole defense has benefited the prosecution.

His arrogance...ah so many words.
 
JP laying down the rules to JB re if he brings up a certain subject to the witness his testimony will likely be stricken

JB getting a bit shirty
 
At break, saw #JeffAshton walking to lunch with #lindadraneburdick and her mom. #judgeperry walking in the other direction to lunch alone.

by stevehelling via twitter at 12:37 PM
 
i don't think the internet is relied upon by scientific experts
jmo
 
No offense to chemists, but I am getting tired of them....
 
Expert Data from Wikipedia....:floorlaugh:
 
Back from recess without jury. Ashton wants to proffer witness, Baez arguing not necessary
by amandaoberwesh via twitter at 12:37 PM

A proffer is basically court w/ no jury. They ask q's to make sure it's okay for jury to hear.
by cfnews13casey via twitter at 12:37 PM
 
HHJB basically saying that if the scientist has run his tests then he can testify but he can't cite the internet as source of his test results. (otherwords: just cause the net says velvetta is choloroform doesn't mean it is)
 
Uh, isn't JB practically saying what JP warned against is exactly what JB wanted the guy to testify to?
 
I would like JB to use that snippy tone in front of the jury.
 
I read the internet, therefore I'm an expert. :floorlaugh:
 
HHJP is giving JB the equivalent of a warning with a cherry on top.

JB showing every indication of operating under his own personal, non-tested rules.


HHJP brings up an excellent point. As an analytical chemist he can have an opinion based on his experience NOT based on an internet search.
 
:lol:

CJBP saying if he read from the internet, we don't need an expert. Anyone can do that!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

DNASolves

Who is Escambia County John Doe (1989)?

Staff online

Members online

... and 193 more.
Total: 4,624 (members: 194, guests: 4,430)

Online statistics

Members online
194
Guests online
4,430
Total visitors
4,624
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
592,464
Messages
17,969,302
Members
228,774
Latest member
truecrime-hazeleyes
Back
Top