Linda7NJ
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2005
- Messages
- 31,866
- Reaction score
- 7,454
Am I in a fog...or is Linda watching DD :what:
Ya caught me! Yes... Blushing... I was missing Mark
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Am I in a fog...or is Linda watching DD :what:
Beth Karas squaring off with Mark Eiglarsh on Dr Drew right now.
I was thinking the same thing. He looks like he has too much makeup on, and I totally disagree with him on his assessment of Juan Martinez although I usually agree with him on most issues.
A little OT but just trying to possibly help Brandi out or any of you who accidentally hit their "backspace" bar. I have a Mac so not sure if this works the same on a PC but if/when I accidentally hit "delete" on my Mac (which is the same as what "backspace" is on a PC) and accidentally erase what I've typed, if you go up to the bar for your web browser (see my pic below to see what I'm talking about exactly) and click "Edit", in the drop-down menu there should be an option for "Undo"; when I click that, it makes my accidentally released stuff reappear (most of the time). Not sure if it works the same on PC but incase it does, just trying to help provide and easy fix/solution for future accidents.
I fell asleep during the afternoon session. What was the best part? I was awake until he asked her the 62 seconds. I fell asleep right around there.
Originally Posted by eLeL724
A little OT but just trying to possibly help Brandi out or any of you who accidentally hit their "backspace" bar. I have a Mac so not sure if this works the same on a PC but if/when I accidentally hit "delete" on my Mac (which is the same as what "backspace" is on a PC) and accidentally erase what I've typed, if you go up to the bar for your web browser (see my pic below to see what I'm talking about exactly) and click "Edit", in the drop-down menu there should be an option for "Undo"; when I click that, it makes my accidentally released stuff reappear (most of the time). Not sure if it works the same on PC but incase it does, just trying to help provide and easy fix/solution for future accidents.
What did he have to say about it?
In a nutshell: you suck at being Mormon, these are cheap shelves that couldn't support you, wth is going on with this gun you grabbed, loaded or not?
With respect that is not true of expert witnesses. Like anyone else under oath, they swear to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. Yes, their understanding of the truth may tend to be colored by their areas of expertise.
But advocacy is the job of the lawyers.
Standard Criminal 18 − Credibility [Believability] of Witnesses
In deciding the facts of this case, you should consider what testimony to accept, and what to reject. You may accept everything a witness says, or part of it, or none of it.
In evaluating testimony, you should use the tests for truthfulness that people use in determining matters of importance in everyday life, including such factors as: the witnesss ability to see or hear or know the things the witness testified to; the quality of the witnesss memory; the witnesss manner while testifying; whether the witness had any motive, bias, or prejudice; whether the witness was contradicted by anything the witness said or wrote before trial, or by other evidence; and the reasonableness of the witnesss testimony when considered in the light of the other evidence.
Consider all of the evidence in the light of reason, common sense, and experience.
Standard Criminal 36 − Defendants Testimony
You must evaluate the defendants testimony the same as any witness testimony.
I think the defendant contradicted herself on purpose many times. And she said that she said things before (like today when she said TA said the gun was loaded) when she really hadn't.
I think she has purposely stated contradictory things because she wants to wreak chaos in the jury room. She wants them to argue with each other and cause an overall state of confusion about the evidence/testimony, such as "she said x"...."no, she said y"...."
...kind of like what happens here with us on WS.
Maybe her strategy is "baffle them with BS."
He sounds more like what I would imagine a screaming tranny might sound like. Why do so many HLN staff SHOUT?
Someone correct me if I am wrong but since the prosecution did not know what JA was going to testify to they should be able to present new evidence to contradict some of the testimony in their rebuttal case. For instance they could call in or provide a demonstration on the viability of someone being able to use the closet shelves to grab the gun, correct?
So, you are on JA's side??Your previous Sulamith:
Originally Posted by AuburnSchnauzer
Something that really stood out to me in today's testimony was when Juan asked Jodi if she wanted to follow by Mormon rules and she said, " I wanted it to APPEAR that way "..... Meaning, she really didn't, but wanted people to THINK that she did.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Venom View Post
I noticed that too. She just wanted to keep up an appearance.
<modsnip>
With respect that is not true of expert witnesses. Like anyone else under oath, they swear to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. Yes, their understanding of the truth may tend to be colored by their areas of expertise.
But advocacy is the job of the lawyers.
Yes, the DA can rebut any testimony in the defense's case in chief, as long as it is admissible per the AZ rules of evidence.Someone correct me if I am wrong but since the prosecution did not know what JA was going to testify to they should be able to present new evidence to contradict some of the testimony in their rebuttal case. For instance they could call in or provide a demonstration on the viability of someone being able to use the closet shelves to grab the gun, correct?