Respecfully Quoted Patty G
Thank you
Why would a story that old, now be reason for the requested "closed meeting?" If LP said this a long time ago, the SA knew about this a long time ago.
Of course, we don't think this is "truth" but what do we think it is? Do we think there is a source but its not LP? Then the source just took what LP already said and gave it to NE? Wouldn't the NE realize that, or maybe they don't care? Do we think NE just made this up(using LP's statement)to say they had an answer to the speculation?
I do not understand how any information published can get away with not being "true", even "rag mags." ?
If we were to take this as truth, it would still mean only that RK overheard or was privy to Casey's confession. The big deal here still being that Casey confessed.
Would something like this even be the reason for the "closed meeting?" If it were true, what would that mean to the case? If anything? TIA
...JS...