SeriouslySearching
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2007
- Messages
- 35,527
- Reaction score
- 262
What I saw wasn't a tat. It was slightly darker than his skin and looked like a comma shape.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Are you sure you didn't see the blurry image of a tattoo? He has one on each arm left and right. It looks like they circle his arms.
I also saw what looked to be a very large bruise on his inner left arm, right above the elbow, when he appeared in court yesterday.
I've also not seen any obvious scratches in all of the recent photos of RC. If they were bad enough to draw blood, would they already be healed up?
Or are we thinking the blood was from AL's head? (as head wounds tend to bleed a bit more profusely)
From what I understand, they will cut up the area surrounding the body before they will touch the body. Preserving evidence is paramount-even over property remaining intact, debirlfan.
Please consider this: a hematoma created in the antecubital area from the phlebotomy performed at the crime laboratory.
Hi joypath!
Can I try a translation? (lol)
"A nice little bruise from his blood draw?"
Hey...do you think they were extra gentle?:innocent:
thx as usual, joypath!
I keep having this awful thought that if this fight WAS about the mice, he may have used something to do with the mice equipment to choke her. Like put her head in some door of some kind and close it on her neck.
okay that's extra terrible, and I'm sorry, but I thought I'd throw it out there, so you can all say "no way" and then, I can sleep at night.
Is there anything reliable out there saying she was dismembered?
Will the autopsy also include toxicology tests? In case she was given a sedative before killed? They didn't mention any defensive wounds or bruising on the body, did they?
I think toxicology is routinely included. Don't know if it will be in the report, but I'm betting it will be. We may not hear the evidence until it's presented in court, from what I understand.
Will the autopsy also include toxicology tests? In case she was given a sedative before killed? They didn't mention any defensive wounds or bruising on the body, did they?
Toxicology is performed on all homicide death (and many many others ) seen at the CT ME's office. Screening for barbiturates and benzodiazepines are part of the routine testing (urine) and quantatiative levels are determined from other body fluids.
The gross anatomy evaluation has NOT been released at this time, will definitely be released during the trial BUT CT is NOT the same as other States (ie Fla) where documents are released to the general public.
So if we won't have access to the documents, will we still have access to the information, via court proceedings?
Further, aside from the autopsy information presented in court, is there a possibility there will be some autopsy information not presented in court, so we may never know the full contents of the autopsy?