"listen carefully"
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DVbEnZgNn1I&feature=PlayList&p=E0C1812906D706F9&playnext=1&playnext_from=PL&index=19"]YouTube - The work of the forensic linguist[/ame]
[nomedia="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=acHg0L5ky30"]YouTube - Solved- Wife's Murder[/nomedia]
I must admit, my trust in the RDI spin team has been shaken.
Remember back to your first teachings, all who gain power are afraid to lose, even the RDI spin team. Good is a point of view. The RDIST and the JIDI are alike in almost every respect, including their quest for greater justice.
Did you ever hear of John Olsson? I thought not. It's not a story the RDI spin team would tell you. He's a JIDI legend. John Olsson is a dark lord so wise and so powerful, he could even demonstrate whether PR and JR wrote the RN together. He has such a knowledge of forensic linguistics even could even save the ones he cared for from RDI spin. Dark side of the forensic linguistics is pathway to many interpretations some would consider to be unnatural. Would it be possible to learn this power? Not from an RDI spin team.
One RDI spin theory is that the note consists of dual authors, such as JR dictating to PR or PR and JR working on the RN together.
http://www.thetext.co.uk/john_olsson.html
John Olsson "John Olsson has published in the Forensic Linguistics peer reviewed professional journal, is the author of a well-known university textbook, Forensic Linguistics (subtitled An Introduction to Language, Crime and the Law), now in its second edition."
"Olsson's forensic analysis has been submitted for evidence before the U.S. Supreme Court and a U.S. District Court. In addition, he has been admitted as an expert in an Australian Federal Court in connection with copyright infringement and has written a number of reports in connection with copyright and trademark infringement."
http://books.google.com/books?id=i3...esult&ct=result&resnum=6#v=onepage&q=&f=false
scroll to page 81-85, based on localized distribution, he rejects the null hypothesis of dual authors.
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DVbEnZgNn1I&feature=PlayList&p=E0C1812906D706F9&playnext=1&playnext_from=PL&index=19"]YouTube - The work of the forensic linguist[/ame]
[nomedia="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=acHg0L5ky30"]YouTube - Solved- Wife's Murder[/nomedia]
I must admit, my trust in the RDI spin team has been shaken.
Remember back to your first teachings, all who gain power are afraid to lose, even the RDI spin team. Good is a point of view. The RDIST and the JIDI are alike in almost every respect, including their quest for greater justice.
Did you ever hear of John Olsson? I thought not. It's not a story the RDI spin team would tell you. He's a JIDI legend. John Olsson is a dark lord so wise and so powerful, he could even demonstrate whether PR and JR wrote the RN together. He has such a knowledge of forensic linguistics even could even save the ones he cared for from RDI spin. Dark side of the forensic linguistics is pathway to many interpretations some would consider to be unnatural. Would it be possible to learn this power? Not from an RDI spin team.
One RDI spin theory is that the note consists of dual authors, such as JR dictating to PR or PR and JR working on the RN together.
http://www.thetext.co.uk/john_olsson.html
John Olsson "John Olsson has published in the Forensic Linguistics peer reviewed professional journal, is the author of a well-known university textbook, Forensic Linguistics (subtitled An Introduction to Language, Crime and the Law), now in its second edition."
"Olsson's forensic analysis has been submitted for evidence before the U.S. Supreme Court and a U.S. District Court. In addition, he has been admitted as an expert in an Australian Federal Court in connection with copyright infringement and has written a number of reports in connection with copyright and trademark infringement."
http://books.google.com/books?id=i3...esult&ct=result&resnum=6#v=onepage&q=&f=false
scroll to page 81-85, based on localized distribution, he rejects the null hypothesis of dual authors.