.... and ex-boyfriendsJust as most psychopaths are not serial killers either. CEOs maybe...
.... and ex-boyfriendsJust as most psychopaths are not serial killers either. CEOs maybe...
Soooo... am I the only one who doubts Romeo Salta's story? Am I the only one who finds it a bit more than a coincidence that his wife is a very outspoken animal activist?
Soooo... am I the only one who doubts Romeo Salta's story? Am I the only one who finds it a bit more than a coincidence that his wife is a very outspoken animal activist?
:waitasec: How so? The gist of the story is his "confession" to the kitten crimes, with a bunch of nutjob-like talk and gratuitous sex scenes (all surprisingly without all that many typos and grammatical errors).I doubt the story (mostly because lawyers/professionals would not normally go public with such info), but ... if the wife is as you say, then i'd think that the info coming out would be slanted more against LRM. As it is, seems to be me it could possibly be beneficial to him instead.
Soooo... am I the only one who doubts Romeo Salta's story? Am I the only one who finds it a bit more than a coincidence that his wife is a very outspoken animal activist?
Why would so many people and organizations create fake facebook pages, websites, email addresses, blog sign-ons and posts, photo albums, letters to police agencies, YouTube videos, etc etc for so many years?i doubted it a bit at first.. but having read it a few times.. it is in the manner that LRM writes.. some of the 42 abuses scream his personality.. and its just to elaborate for anyone BUT lm to have created..
why would the lawyer create such a wild story, which can be considered liable/slander if untrue, about a serial killer in another country. and go through so much effort in it
Soooo... am I the only one who doubts Romeo Salta's story? Am I the only one who finds it a bit more than a coincidence that his wife is a very outspoken animal activist?
It's about 2 hours worth of work, and now that Luka won't be seeing daylight for a while, I don't think he's too concerned about being hauled in front of the N.Y. lawyer's society as being the state's first dishonest lawyer for it, nor for his obvious breach of client-solicitor privilege.i dont know....
i mean for him to flat out lie about his dealings with LM and completely fabricate those emails and obtain and photoshop that picture?
that is an awful lot of lying to the world for an officer of the court.....by him lying like that he could put his name and career in the sh.tter
It's about 2 hours worth of work, and now that Luka won't be seeing daylight for a while, I don't think he's too concerned about being hauled in front of the N.Y. lawyer's society as being the first dishonest lawyer for it, nor for his obvious breach of client-solicitor privilege.
He didn't.I'm curiuos about the lawyer's comment that LM wanted the story of his abuse out there. When did LM tell him this?
Why would so many people and organizations create fake facebook pages, websites, email addresses, blog sign-ons and posts, photo albums, letters to police agencies, YouTube videos, etc etc for so many years?
Kittens.
Libel and slander are the least of least of Luka's worries now, and Mr. Salta knows it. That's why he waited to release the info until today. It's not as if Luka's going to lawyer up and sue him in a N.Y. court.
Yes, I do.but he is an officer of the court (Member of the New York State Bar since 1981
Member of the Federal District Courts for the Southern and Eastern District of New York)...
he is not some random anonymous person saying "LM stayed in my room while i boinked him for 2 nights and this is my story"...
those words he said to the reporter are there FOREVER.....you really think he would risk his name and his career (he has his own firm) over some like luka by fabricating a huge story complete with picture?
i just dont see that....
I'm not defending that but he says Luka wanted that out there.
See these comments under the story
Why do you think this officer of the court breached his client's confidentiality by running, not to the police during an international manhunt, but to a journalist over a year later?i think your missing the point.. he stand nothing to gain from making up a story about lrm talking to him a year and a half ago, and creating these emails. why would he go to the great lengths of creating that picture?
the only person that would have anything to gain and have clear motive is LRM, either in creating a BS story, being a complete lunatic, or in the billion to one chance there really is a manny.
He didn't.
The attorney says in the comment section that LM wanted the story of the kittens "disseminated" and that he wanted his story of abuse told....Why do you think this officer of the court breached his client's confidentiality by running, not to the police during an international manhunt, but to a journalist over a year later?
I'm open to hearing what possible legitimate reason anyone thinks this guy had for committing one of the most basic ethical violations of the legal advocacy system.