TX TX - Julie Moseley, 9, Mary Trlica, 17, Lisa Wilson, 14, Fort Worth, 23 Dec 1974 - #1

Status
Not open for further replies.
If I had more information or all the facts, I might have a different view, but I think the security guard scenario makes more sense than someone taking them against their will. If someone forced them to come with them I dont think the guy would have tried to do it in the mall and even the walk from the mall to the car in broad daylight doesnt seem like it would appeal to an abductor. Too much traffic during Xmas , that is if the parking lot was the one on the Seminary drive side.

If they were kept in the basement till late in the evening they might have left a clue in what ever room they were in.

Of course, we don't know if the girls made it back to the car. It might have been that the unsub was waiting for the girls at the car and when they got in, he jumped in and carjacked them and later returned the car to the parking lot - which is why he knew where the car was parked for the letter. In other words, he may have seen the girls go into the store, parked nearby and waited, then started walking past their car as they got in and suddenly jumped in and carjacked them - passerby's might not notice that type of thing. If he had a gun, it would be easy to control the three girls.
 
I'll take a trip out there to see what access to the bowling area and also the other area where the radio station was, I 'm pretty sure that part of the mall is not enclosed , the only part that really looks different to me is the northeast corner
 
I also remember that the railroad tracks that ran along the west side of the Mall had a rather large system of drainage tunnels that ran for miles in several directions. I'm not sure how close they ran to the underground structures of the Mall but it would be interesting to know if they connected anywhere.
 
Let me restate that...the railroad tracks didnt have the drainage tunnels, but there WAS an entrance to the system right at the tracks by the Mall (very close to the outward building that later became the movie theater). I know the tunnels ran all along Seminary and Hemphill though because my cousins and I used to play in them. I just cant recall if they went closer to the Mall than at the tracks. It sure seems like they did but I can't say for sure.
 
Of course, we don't know if the girls made it back to the car. It might have been that the unsub was waiting for the girls at the car and when they got in, he jumped in and carjacked them and later returned the car to the parking lot - which is why he knew where the car was parked for the letter. In other words, he may have seen the girls go into the store, parked nearby and waited, then started walking past their car as they got in and suddenly jumped in and carjacked them - passerby's might not notice that type of thing. If he had a gun, it would be easy to control the three girls.


Thats possible , but if there in the parking lot by Sears in the south lot Seminary Drive is right there with very heavy traffic, and it has to be between 12 and 4 in broad daylight. Not saying it couldnt have happened that way though.
 
Diege, tonight I was watching a documentary about sexual slavery in America. Marc Klaass knows a lot about this. I am convinced that you need to get in contact with him, if you haven't been already. Houston is one of the major points of human trafficking, which I'm sure you already know. If you don't know how to reach Marc Klaass, I will help you arrange it and help you get his attention.
 
I am wondering the exact same thing - and also wondering if perhaps they are still somewhere in that mall. Maybe the point of the letter was to send police looking everywhere but the mall. The thing is their bodies have never been found, but if there were abandoned or little used areas in the basement - could they have been concealed in some way - perhaps under a new cement floor or by construction going on down there? I remember the massive storage area at my high school had a dirt floor - could there have been an area like that at Seminary South? The thought is really very frightening. During Christmas an unsub could keep the girls in a secluded area and no one would hear anything when the mall was empty overnight and on Christmas day. I do wonder if 3 girls taken with 2 nights leading up to Christmas plus Christmas night was likely more than a coincidence in the mind of the unsub. Yet the buildings have been rennovated twice since 1974 - once to turn it into an enclosed mall and a second time to turn it into a lifestyle center and nothing was found. Just the same, I'm wondering if it would make sense for investigators to use ground penetrating radar on the basement floor of the mall.

Makes sense to me! :crazy:

I was also wonder it could have been another employee of the mall. In one of the articles I remember that one of the employees reported to the police that a shopper told them that they saw the girls "hustled" into a truck. LE never got to talk to this shopper because they left before LE could speak to them. Seems weird that a witness would do that in a case like this.

Maybe there was no shopper. Maybe the employee was trying to throw police in the wrong direction... An employee would have access to the basement floor of the mall. I know... this scenario is far-fetched, but I thought I'd throw it out there.:)

And I don't mean to implicate LE in this, it just seems to strange to me that they considered it a runaway when there was so much evidence that said otherwise. The car was left behind for goodness sake!

I also think that it is an excellent idea to contact Mark Klaas about the slavery angle. I can't imagine that LE even thought to examine that angle back then. Even now there is so little awareness of that issue.
 
I'll take a trip out there to see what access to the bowling area and also the other area where the radio station was, I 'm pretty sure that part of the mall is not enclosed , the only part that really looks different to me is the northeast corner

Just be super careful at that mall!
 
Diege, you told us that Renee's mom started calling to find her around 2pm. What time did the parents call the police regarding the girls?
 
So for the above reasons, I feel certain that these girls were abducted by a stranger or someone they knew but should not have trusted.
I enjoyed your post, particularly the above portion. I think you've hit the nail on the head. Because of the letter, I've always thought it was someone they knew that wasn't trustworthy...a gut feeling if you will...but of course it could a stranger as well.
 
I was thinking about the Security Guards' story of seeing the girls in another Security Guards' truck at 11:30pm. He said they were happy and laughing, but I wonder if they might have been drugged. What if he had held the girls all day in a room in the basement of the mall and somehow drugged them - maybe put something in drinks he gave them, all the while saying he was waiting until the police or their parents came and he was getting ready to take them away from the Mall when the other security guard saw him with the girls in the truck? The girls might have shown him their car at that time.
I was thinking more along the lines that A) they knew him (of course if this sighting is true) or B) he was a genial type, good at getting people to feel at ease, and since he's a security guard, there would be no reason to fear in their minds. He could have driven near their car, they could have pointed it out, then he could have made up an excuse to go back to the basement and they could have willingly followed for whatever reason. LIke maybe: "Here's the car." "Ok. Oh wait I forgot about XYZ, would you guys mind coming back with me while I do (or get) XYZ?" I dunno, it's just a thought.
 
Someone mentioned this before I think it was Princess, but the term "catch it" doesnt sound right did Deige ever answer that it was a term Rachel or their family used? Everyone I know would have said "get it" like "we are going to get it when Mom see's this mess". Also "Sears upper lot" doesnt sound like a term that a shopper would use. It sounds like a title given to the lot to distinguish between Sears other lots to be clear so the person they were talking to knew exactly where they meant, LIKE A SECURITY GUARD WHO IN THE NORMAL ROUTINE OF HIS JOB WOULD REFER TO THE DIFFERENT LOTS ALL DAY LONG. I still dont know what they meant by "Sears upper lot" it could mean one of three different lots.
 
Someone mentioned this before I think it was Princess, but the term "catch it" doesnt sound right did Deige ever answer that it was a term Rachel or their family used? Everyone I know would have said "get it" like "we are going to get it when Mom see's this mess". Also "Sears upper lot" doesnt sound like a term that a shopper would use. It sounds like a title given to the lot to distinguish between Sears other lots to be clear so the person they were talking to knew exactly where they meant, LIKE A SECURITY GUARD WHO IN THE NORMAL ROUTINE OF HIS JOB WOULD REFER TO THE DIFFERENT LOTS ALL DAY LONG. I still dont know what they meant by "Sears upper lot" it could mean one of three different lots.

I totally agree with you! I can't imagine using a term like that, and I can't imagine a teenager using it either.
 
Someone mentioned this before I think it was Princess, but the term "catch it" doesnt sound right did Deige ever answer that it was a term Rachel or their family used? Everyone I know would have said "get it" like "we are going to get it when Mom see's this mess". Also "Sears upper lot" doesnt sound like a term that a shopper would use. It sounds like a title given to the lot to distinguish between Sears other lots to be clear so the person they were talking to knew exactly where they meant, LIKE A SECURITY GUARD WHO IN THE NORMAL ROUTINE OF HIS JOB WOULD REFER TO THE DIFFERENT LOTS ALL DAY LONG. I still dont know what they meant by "Sears upper lot" it could mean one of three different lots.

I am so glad you mentioned this. I thought the exact same thing last night about the term "Sears upper lot" and forgot all about it by this morning. It sounds exactly like someone, such as a security guard who is trained on the layout of the mall would talk because he would have to be able to communicate by radio to another security guard where he was if there was a problem and he needed police or help.

When I park at the mall I would describe it as : Outside Neiman Marcus, downstairs where the doors go into the men's department or Upstairs at Neiman Marcus where the lingerie and shoe department is. I would NEVER use a term like "upper lot" to describe where I parked at a mall.
 
I was thinking more along the lines that A) they knew him (of course if this sighting is true) or B) he was a genial type, good at getting people to feel at ease, and since he's a security guard, there would be no reason to fear in their minds. He could have driven near their car, they could have pointed it out, then he could have made up an excuse to go back to the basement and they could have willingly followed for whatever reason. LIke maybe: "Here's the car." "Ok. Oh wait I forgot about XYZ, would you guys mind coming back with me while I do (or get) XYZ?" I dunno, it's just a thought.

I believe the sighting was around 11:30 pm - after the mall had closed. That's why I was thinking he might have been taking them away from the mall at that time. Of course, you are right, he could have been friendly and they might have liked him - in the documentary I watched last night, many of the girls taken into sexual slavery in America were befriended by someone who got them to go somewhere with them, at which point they were kidnapped. Still, it is odd that they would be happy to be there that late at night.
 
Here's a scenario, based on everyone's input:

The security guard was driving around the mall. Secretly he was trawling for girls to give to someone and he sees the girls pull into the Sears Upper Lot. He parked his vehicle and followed them in the mall. At some point he apprehended one of the girls - perhaps Renee and accused her of shoplifting. Rachel and Julie go along with the security guard and Renee trying to clear things up. The security guard puts them in the holding room and asks for ID. Rachel gives him her Driver's License. He leaves them in the room and writes the note, looks up Rachel's husband's name in the phone book and mails it. After a time he comes back and says he can't get Renee's mom on the phone so they have to wait. In the meantime, he goes back on duty walking around the mall so no one notices his absence. He goes back and checks on them from time to time, repeating he hasn't been able to reach Renee's mom. He offers them drinks which he has drugged and a snack since it's been hours. Once the mall is closed, he is to lock up, so he goes down and gets the girls and tells them he will take them to their car and just forget the whole thing. He gets them in the security truck and starts to drive away with them. At this point, he inadvertently is seen with the girls by the other security guard. The girls are giggly from the drugs he has given them, so the other guard thinks everything is OK.

I guess, to me, the biggest hole in this story is how on earth would both security guards NOT know that 3 girls were missing from that mall that day? Surely Rachel, Renee or Julie's family told the mall security personnel that they were looking for the girls. But maybe this didn't happen or maybe they only told one mall security person - the one who had the girls, so he never spread the word?

I really wish we knew more about mall security personnel of the time such as how long they were employed at the mall and when they left their jobs there.
 
Here's a scenario, based on everyone's input:

The security guard was driving around the mall. Secretly he was trawling for girls to give to someone and he sees the girls pull into the Sears Upper Lot. He parked his vehicle and followed them in the mall. At some point he apprehended one of the girls - perhaps Renee and accused her of shoplifting. Rachel and Julie go along with the security guard and Renee trying to clear things up. The security guard puts them in the holding room and asks for ID. Rachel gives him her Driver's License. He leaves them in the room and writes the note, looks up Rachel's husband's name in the phone book and mails it. After a time he comes back and says he can't get Renee's mom on the phone so they have to wait. In the meantime, he goes back on duty walking around the mall so no one notices his absence. He goes back and checks on them from time to time, repeating he hasn't been able to reach Renee's mom. He offers them drinks which he has drugged and a snack since it's been hours. Once the mall is closed, he is to lock up, so he goes down and gets the girls and tells them he will take them to their car and just forget the whole thing. He gets them in the security truck and starts to drive away with them. At this point, he inadvertently is seen with the girls by the other security guard. The girls are giggly from the drugs he has given them, so the other guard thinks everything is OK.

I guess, to me, the biggest hole in this story is how on earth would both security guards NOT know that 3 girls were missing from that mall that day? Surely Rachel, Renee or Julie's family told the mall security personnel that they were looking for the girls. But maybe this didn't happen or maybe they only told one mall security person - the one who had the girls, so he never spread the word?

I really wish we knew more about mall security personnel of the time such as how long they were employed at the mall and when they left their jobs there.

This is from the Missingtrio.com site:
As darkness settled over the city, she [Judy Wilson, Renee's mother] became frantic. She had the girls paged at all the stores in the shopping center. She called the hospitals and the police. Long before the shoppers went home, they found the car.

Great job with the scenario!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
152
Guests online
3,221
Total visitors
3,373

Forum statistics

Threads
592,295
Messages
17,966,825
Members
228,735
Latest member
dil2288
Back
Top