BBM - just because some have an opinion one way or the other, doesn't mean they should be labeled here at WS. IMO - this is not a pro/con forum, it's a victim's forum.
The autopsy should should show whether there were defensive wounds or not. According to the lead investigator, GZ's injuries were not consistent with his story (stories).
I think this is a special case, as the outcome will DETERMINE if TM was a victim or not. Unlike MOST death cases, where there is a DEFINITE "victim", there is not necessarily a victim here. If GZ is found not guilty, and warranted in his use of self defemse, well, then TM is no longer a "victim", he becomes a "perpetrator".
And yes, we will find out a lot when the autopsy is released.