LiveLaughLuv
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2008
- Messages
- 4,720
- Reaction score
- 17
That works both ways. The assault stopped after the sound of the gun, therefore if it was GZ screaming, he had no reason to continue screaming.
Spin it any way you like it..but it doesn't seem to coincide with the evidence as the investigator also states...
Everyone who supports GZ and his actions/behaviors will spin it all to support him, as I support the victim..
but my support on the victim is more in line with what evidence was realeased so far...I have a great sense of right and wrong and I find GZ's actions/behaviors totally in the wrong..
He's the adult who should have known better..but his aggressive tendencies, his propensity for violence, makes me believe GZ was the aggressor for if he was that fightened, he wouldn't have left his vehicle...common sense goes a looooong way...