New to site, snooping forum since beginning of case. One point progressively nagging me,- the screams that alerted Will Truter and his neighbour to go outside their houses' and investigate,on the night abc went missing.The link for this Sunday Mail article is in the first thread, as referred to by alicat, post#186,-read this.Sure, there was/were party/parties going on in the vicinity that evening. to which previous posts have stated. However, Will Truter and his neighbour were fairly specific in their description of three screams heard, where the third and final scream was a muffled version of the former two. Irrespective of variables-distances, locations, blabby de bla etc., I can't help but see this as significant, because of:
a. the nature of the screams described. Also, no mention was made of any other noises/ranting/etc., just the screams. I am assuming that like most of us, Will Truter and his neighbours are able to distinguish between the mouthy rantings and wailings of a couple/group of teenagers in party mode, and the distinct screams of a person who knows they're going to be killed or seriously harmed (if that was the case). Given that the third scream was muffled then, it is likely that they were in danger.
b. the timing of these screams coincides with a woman's disappearance in the area, and in a time frame significant to abc going missing.
Then again, it could've just been the antics of teenagers.
