11/9/11 MSM reports "major change" to timeline (Oct. 4 phone call)
- Thread starter epiphany
- Start date
- Status
Who's changing the timeline? Another random person they are interviewing?
It's not a change in timeline when the last timeline you reported was on shaky credibilty ground to begin with. I dunno, it seems some journalists have thrown fact checking out the window with this case.
No, MW did not get her cell back that night.
:hand::hand::hand: That's it. There is no time line. People are making up time lines, I am convinced of it. I hope LE has an accurate time line and all the others, be it misinformed reporters or criminally inclined peeps, are just fabrications. I can't take it anymore! :crazy:
It's ridiculous now. At what point do we start calling some of these news stations the National Enquirer?
I'm pretty sure it isn't LE. I'm seriously starting to doubt if there was ever a phonecall at all at this point.
I think it was 2:30Am, then 8:30, now 11:57.
I recall when it was changed to 8:30 it was said to be because there was confusion over it being military time. 20:30 hours or something to that effect.
Wright: I was downstairs probably from 5:00 that night until midnight when I was looking for my phone again."
Russ: "So at the time the mystery call came, what happened?"
Wright: "I'm not sure, from what I was told from people who were upstairs at the time said Dane had the phone all night. I don't know if it was answered if it went to voicemail or if he was on the phone at the time.
Wright: Honestly I have no clue. I don't know if he answered and tried to leave."
Russ: "But you believe this person had the phone all night."
Wright: "From what I've been told, yes, but without me being upstairs and seeing who had the phone it is hard for me to say.
http://www.nbcactionnews.com/dpp/ne...-wants-her-name-cleared-in-case#ixzz1dEY4hnfa
Also, a video in last evening's thread in which MW states when her cell was in her possession again.
~n/t~
New Member
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2011
- Messages
- 17,670
- Reaction score
- 68
Yes you're right the 8:30 was after the 2:30. :rollercoaster:
Peliman
New Member
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2008
- Messages
- 6,766
- Reaction score
- 46
Well to be fair here it wouldn't surprise me that LE gave mis-information to MW and in public statement just to see how they responded. I think the 2:30 timeline was first reported and it was the MW interview that she mentioned LE asked her about an 8:30pm phone call. I just believe all the different phone times is LE investigating who's telling the truth about what.
Loaned from the phone company?
I'm not too familiar with it, do phone companies do that? Give someone a loaner phone with their same phone number when their account is restricted?
From that news time line, JI ran next door, from other articals I've read, he ran across the street. Does anyone know which is correct, or did he do both? txs
- Status