Nancy Cooper, 34, of Cary, N.C. #25

Status
Not open for further replies.
Fran - thanks for your latest link above to 14 NBC. Seems Mark Sullivan hit the nail on the head : "Tell me everything you know so we won't be surprised at trial ". Interesting comment.

The same attorney (article says Sullivan is a family law specialist that News14 interviewed...) also notes- ... "the documents requested in the subpoenas are not out of the ordinary when custody of children is at stake."

So, the action by BC and his attorneys doesn't seem to necessarily be 'out of the ordinary', or 'ruthless' necessarily, but rather, quite typical in a custody case. Time will tell I suppose how much is allowed by the judge and how much is considered relevant, but at least the requesting part... seems to not be uncommon. Good to know.
 
The same attorney (article says Sullivan is a family law specialist that News14 interviewed...) also notes- ... "the documents requested in the subpoenas are not out of the ordinary when custody of children is at stake."

So, the action by BC and his attorneys doesn't seem to necessarily be 'out of the ordinary', or 'ruthless' necessarily, but rather, quite typical in a custody case. Time will tell I suppose how much is allowed by the judge and how much is considered relevant, but at least the requesting part... seems to not be uncommon. Good to know.

Told you there was nothing unusual about this case :crazy:
 
Fran - thanks for your latest link above to 14 NBC. Seems Mark Sullivan hit the nail on the head : "Tell me everything you know so we won't be surprised at trial ". Interesting comment.

y/w raisincharlie:

Which trial would that be? ;)

fran
 
The same attorney (article says Sullivan is a family law specialist that News14 interviewed...) also notes- ... "the documents requested in the subpoenas are not out of the ordinary when custody of children is at stake."

So, the action by BC and his attorneys doesn't seem to necessarily be 'out of the ordinary', or 'ruthless' necessarily, but rather, quite typical in a custody case. Time will tell I suppose how much is allowed by the judge and how much is considered relevant, but at least the requesting part... seems to not be uncommon. Good to know.

IMHO, I do NOT believe that guy read every single document. I don't see what an affair/NOT affair of Jessica and her husband has to do with BRAD being an UNFIT father. b/s:mad:

Besides, who keeps emails? NOT me.

LOL, what's Brad's lawyer think, ONE of US is any of those people he has listed?:rolleyes:

JMHO
fran
 
y/w raisincharlie:

Which trial would that be? ;)

fran


My suspicion - it is definitely more oriented to a murder trial as there is absolutely no way affairs or no affairs relating to the friends has any possible bearing on the custody issue - kinda like Brad's own affidavits:crazy:

Fishing for the future.
 
I don't see what an affair/NOT affair of Jessica and her husband has to do with BRAD being an UNFIT father. b/s - fran

there is absolutely no way affairs or no affairs relating to the friends has any possible bearing on the custody issue - rc


Don't you guys think, though, that what he is trying to do is make it seem as though his cheating has no bearing on him being a fit father, as he has proof that others do it too, and therefore it is commonplace?
 
I don't see what an affair/NOT affair of Jessica and her husband has to do with BRAD being an UNFIT father. b/s - fran

there is absolutely no way affairs or no affairs relating to the friends has any possible bearing on the custody issue - rc

Don't you guys think, though, that what he is trying to do is make it seem as though his cheating has no bearing on him being a fit father, as he has proof that others do it too, and therefore it is commonplace?

Being common place - if it is - doesn't mean it is right and doesn't give him a legal right to do it as well. This is about smear and nothing more. He is vindictive more than worrying about his kids IMO.
 
I don't see what an affair/NOT affair of Jessica and her husband has to do with BRAD being an UNFIT father. b/s - fran

there is absolutely no way affairs or no affairs relating to the friends has any possible bearing on the custody issue - rc


Don't you guys think, though, that what he is trying to do is make it seem as though his cheating has no bearing on him being a fit father, as he has proof that others do it too, and therefore it is commonplace?


NO, I THINK he's trying to destroy everything in his path to his OWN destruction!:furious:

Seriously.....

Like others have said, what's done is done. Nancy is dead and nothing can change that. Did Brad do it? Some think so.......even LE suspects it per all accounts.

Brad KNOWS what he did and he KNOWS he can't change it and he KNOWS in his heart, he's going down for it, :mad:, IMHO.

On his way down, he's going to take anyone and everyone that opposed him!:eek:

FWIW, maybe NOW those who thought Nancy was an embellisher, see that she was NOT! He's EXACTLY what Nancy portrayed, IMHO.:chicken:

JMHO
fran

PS........ALSO, FWIW, I believe that this shot over the bow, is a warning to anyone else out there, who was THINKING about possibly going to LE, you say anything to LE about your past dealings with me, you'll get the same treatment! I'll tear you to ribbons! :eek:.....jmho, fran
 
Being common place - if it is - doesn't mean it is right and doesn't give him a legal right to do it as well. This is about smear and nothing more. He is vindictive more than worrying about his kids IMO.

Yes, exactly! Remember the kids of these various folks are the same kids that Bella & Katie played with and went to kiddie parties with. This is the kids' social structure--the one that Brad refers to in his affidavits. Now the parents of Katie & Bella's friends are being trashed and in areas that have NOTHING to do with either a custody issue or are connected to Nancy's murder. Vindictive is the right word for that.
 
Since you live in NC - how loud would an arguement in February have to be for the neighbors to hear it and to approach the house and ask about taking the children for a while ?
 
I don't live in that neighborhood. And of course it all depends on things like where in the house the argument took place, the type of construction and insulation that may provide noise dampening qualities, the time of day/night and where the neighbors were, physically, in relation to where the argument occurred. Were any windows open in either the Cooper house or at any of the neighbors' houses? Did any dogs bark? All variables that come into play. The argument would likely have to be pretty LOUD for anyone to hear....let's start inside the house though. Did either of the KIDS hear their parents arguing? Is it possible one or both kids 'heard' the murder of their mother? Or at least heard their mommy struggling?

As for last February...where did the argument take place? Was it outside? Which neighbor heard?
 
O/T - if you live in NC and you need gas you should get to a station right away. It was 3.69 this am and it was 4.19 at 2pm and Exxon spokesperson said it would be 5.50 or more by 7pm tonight.
 
O/T - if you live in NC and you need gas you should get to a station right away. It was 3.69 this am and it was 4.19 at 2pm and Exxon spokesperson said it would be 5.50 or more by 7pm tonight.


But they also said not to quick rush out and get gas just to top off your tank, because that would SURELY run the supply out! Only get it if you need it!
 
But they also said not to quick rush out and get gas just to top off your tank, because that would SURELY run the supply out! Only get it if you need it!

Oh shoot I forgot to post that. That's what I get for assuming - I was on Empty so I had to get gas and so was my daughter. Luckily we filled up this morning.

PS I saw you trying to fight the good fight over at GoLO - it's a no win situation over there!!!!!
 
Oh shoot I forgot to post that. That's what I get for assuming - I was on Empty so I had to get gas and so was my daughter. Luckily we filled up this morning.

PS I saw you trying to fight the good fight over at GoLO - it's a no win situation over there!!!!!

But if you, wonderful, intelligent, helpful Topsail Girl, would get 30 of your closest buddies from WS and go on over there and teach 'em a thing or two, maybe they wouldn't post so quickly. It's just a completely different world over there, isn't it? The land of the "how smart a$$ can I be in two lines?"
 
They just don't get it. I'd be willing to bet half the people posting over there are friends of Brads or just complete moroons - (you might not recognize moroons. It's an old timers joke around here meaning morons) :)

ETA - you can't have an intelligent discussion with posters with 2 brain cells and GoLo is full of 'em!!!
 
They just don't get it. I'd be willing to bet half the people posting over there are friends of Brads or just complete moroons - (you might not recognize moroons. It's an old timers joke around here meaning morons) :)

ETA - you can't have an intelligent discussion with posters with 2 brain cells and GoLo is full of 'em!!!

Why IS that, TG?? I just don't want to let it go because those people seem sum educatin'!! I want them to see there is a much more civilized way of doing things, of discussing the issues... aggghhh... how can you help getting on there and posting responses? Several of those posters even have the word "mom" in them and they are posting "Go Brad!" "Sue the neighbors!" "Cary hens!" "Busybody neighbors!" It drives me crazy because here a murder has occured, and they still want people to mind their own business?! They even say JA is suspicious because she called the police! I just want to tell them all off for being so ignorant!!!

Ok, I know I am banging my head against a wall... but it just makes me want to :puke:
 
I don't live in that neighborhood. And of course it all depends on things like where in the house the argument took place, the type of construction and insulation that may provide noise dampening qualities, the time of day/night and where the neighbors were, physically, in relation to where the argument occurred. Were any windows open in either the Cooper house or at any of the neighbors' houses? Did any dogs bark? All variables that come into play. The argument would likely have to be pretty LOUD for anyone to hear....let's start inside the house though. Did either of the KIDS hear their parents arguing? Is it possible one or both kids 'heard' the murder of their mother? Or at least heard their mommy struggling?

As for last February...where did the argument take place? Was it outside? Which neighbor heard?

Guess I should have been more to the point. Climate wise - is it cool enough in February to have a house closed up to keep warm for instance ? For sake of discussion if the argument was indoors, it was cold enough to have a house closed up, the neighbors as well would you think it had to have been a pretty loud argument even to heard in houses to the left and right of the Cooper house ? If the neighbors that heard the argument came from across the street, under such conditions, had to have been really loud yes ? If the neighbors came for the children - if the argument was ooutside and the kids inside why bother as long as the children were not in the same area?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
166
Guests online
1,136
Total visitors
1,302

Forum statistics

Threads
589,940
Messages
17,927,972
Members
228,009
Latest member
chrsrb10
Back
Top