Thanks Patty. You are so great at reminding us of court dates.Patty G said:FAYETTEVILLE Antoinette Davis, a Fayetteville mother accused of prostituting her 5-year-old daughter, is scheduled to appear in court Thursday (6/3/10).
http://charlotte.news14.com/content...ed-of-trafficking-daughter-to-appear-in-court
Fear not angel baby - continuances mean nothing, our memory is long.
I find it interesting that she was walking all by herself. No attorney and no family members or friends to support her. Not that anyone should support her but how often do we see somebody outside a courthouse, charged with a crime, all by themselves?
Considering the horrible crime she has been charged with, I would think she would have had some sort of protection. It did look like someone was behind her, but I can not tell if it's more reporters, security, her atty, or her family.
She makes me sick.
She did look healthy though. Normally I could care less, but for the sake of that baby, that's a good thing.
That poor baby is developing in the womb of a monster. I hope he/she never knows what his/her "mother" did to his/her sister. I hope as soon as that baby is born, they will take it and that baby NEVER has to see or be touched by AD again.
JMO
But she has been chraged and is out on bond, awiting trial for selling her daughter. I don't see her being able to keep the baby. They already took her son.
I think they will take the baby as soon as she delivers it.
JMO
Well, I think he was taken due to the conditions he was living in when they arrived after AD's bogus 911 call. Then AD was arrested and sat in jail for a while, only to be freed on bond. She will still have to stand trial and IMO will go to prison for a long time.
I'm sure, although I don't know, DSS will be called in when this baby is born. I just don't see how anyone would allow her, given her charges, to have 1 minute with this baby.
But, I could be wrong. I could be just looking at it in a common sense standpoint and not a legal one. And, as we all know, legal standpoints are sometimes lacking any and all common sense. I mean, she is walking free right now because a judge set a crazy low bond amount. So, who knows.
They never say anything at all they just print the date in the paper and let us wonder how justice can possibly prevail:waitasec:What is this hearing about? The linked article did not specify. TIA