Just2Cents
New Member
- Joined
- Dec 2, 2008
- Messages
- 4
- Reaction score
- 0
I know that there is a thread that indicates that Lee is not the father per the report that was released on 2/18/09. I hate to say what I am about to say, but it does add food for thought:
The documents indicate that Q55 and Q56 did not include DNA or STR typing results. I am not sure what this means, but IMO they did not have an adequate sample of Cindy's DNA.
There is no mention of what happened with George's DNA. I understand that Lee is not the father of Caylee, but why is no comparison to George's DNA indicated in this report?
The documents indicate that Q55 and Q56 did not include DNA or STR typing results. I am not sure what this means, but IMO they did not have an adequate sample of Cindy's DNA.
There is no mention of what happened with George's DNA. I understand that Lee is not the father of Caylee, but why is no comparison to George's DNA indicated in this report?
