What'sThatClue
Active Member
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2008
- Messages
- 4,168
- Reaction score
- -17
I had a little time on my lunch break and decided to look into (some may say research) LDT and saw a few articles that caught my eye. I myself would not take such a test and I'm not guilty of anything. I would have to try to prove my innocence otherwise. Now DS may or may not be doing that. We don't know. For all we know the only reason LE deemed him as not cooperative is because of the LDT. Here is just one of the articles I read and hopfully I get the link right! This is my first time providing a link. I think the last part of the article itself is a great piece of advice :
Here's my advice: If you're ever asked to take a polygraph test, say "No way." If you have to if it's a job requirement relax and tell the truth. It won't make much of a difference
This post has been MOO!!!!
http://www.usatoday.com/tech/columnist/andrewkantor/2004-04-08-kantor_x.htm
Thank you. Many people feel that LDT's are inaccurate. But there's just so much more that points to DSjr than his refusal to take the LDT. I just wonder how much DSjr has actually done to prove his innocence. LOL, I realize that no one has to "prove" their innocence but rather that guilt must be proven. But if it were me, I'd be screaming my innocence from the rooftops and providing all the help I could to find Michelle. I'd be working with her family in addition to LE. We haven't seen evidence that DSjr has done anything to do so. At least publicly. Which is too bad, really, and most especially too bad for Michelle and her family. JMO, if he really cared at least about his children, he'd be doing all he could to help find their mother.