Number one,I cant think of any other instance in my experience where an 'accident' victim is found with duct tape over their mouth possibly wrapped in a blanket then a garbage bag and dumped in the woods.
Casey's behavior after Caylee is gone.
How could any of it possibly be attributed to a mother who's child has accidentally died?
Lingeree and Beer?
Dirty dancing at the Club?
'A Beautiful Life' Tattoo?
The 'Nanny' story?
Which one of these things indicates an accident?
Which ones indicate premeditated murder? Most of these behaviours are after the fact and are those we would normally expect from someone who's child was 'safe and happy, but just temporarily in someone else's care' (giving the young mom some extra 'me' time) which is EXACTLY the story that she was acting out in the first month after Caylee's death. If she wanted that story to stick, she could not be seen getting upset, but that does not prove that she felt nothing, or that she didn't go through a private silent hell when the spotlights were off her – we know she had nightmares! I believe KC is a coward and could not own up to the fact that Caylee died whilst in her care – especially to CA! Her denial of Caylee's death and any responsibility she had for it, and the hiding of her little body is both cowardly and callous and shows that she was more concerned about saving her own skin after the event, but it does NOT prove premeditated murder.
Because from where im sitting they indicate someone who is absolutely exultant at the way things turned out then trying deperately to avoid the consequences of her actions.
I don't see any exultant behaviour – I see someone who is acting out the lies that have been spun to hide a horrible truth. Would you really expect a mom who's young daughter is 'off having a fabulous time with a trusted nanny' to be sobbing uncontrollably in the ladies room at Fusion? It was an act, a cover, the despicable actions of a cowardly liar who does not have the backbone to admit the truth, but it doesn't automatically follow that the 'truth' was a premeditated murder. KC is a LIAR – she lies to get herself out of even the most innocuous situations (like telling people she can't go to a social event because she is 'working', rather than just saying she is broke or can't get a babysitter), so do you really think that she would suddenly turn over a new leaf when faced with her most horrendous 'situation' ever?
Not something you would see in someone who would find themselves with a dead child by circumstance then trying to cover it up for some nebulous reason.
Im curious I mean we could all come up with possible scenarios involving an accident no matter how implausible.
What is it in the knowledge of this case that we have that indicates to you that it was an accident?
There must be something for you to feel as strongly as you do about it.
Please share.
I have added some comments (in blue) to your original post above.
What are the facts and evidence that point to a premeditated murder, rather than an accident, probably due to negligence, followed by a callous cover-up?
We have:
1)
the PC searches – specifically chloroform
JWG has looked closely at these searches and has come up with a very plausible alternative explanation that works against premeditation. It's just as likely to be the real explanation IMO.
2)
KC's alleged desire to be rid of her child so that she could party into the sunset.
She seemed to be managing a fairly good social life before Caylee's death, and even if CA had tried to clamp down on her after discovering the lies about her 'work' and 'sleepovers with the nanny', I doubt CA would have tried to stop her gong out at all. I think KC would soon have won her over again, and we know CA loved looking after Caylee – she even said she was upset that KC 'kept Caylee with the nanny during the work trip to Jacksonville ' ( another KC invention) because she was on leave all week herself and would have looked after Caylee. I don't believe KC needed to murder Caylee to get more party time.
3)
The theory that KC killed Caylee because AL did not want female children
He may have said this, but I find it hard to believe that he meant he would not want
Caylee, or that KC would have thought that's what he meant. He obviously liked Caylee, and said in his texts to KC on June 16 that he cared about
both of them. More importantly, KC knew that her relationship with AL was probably temporary anyway, with or without Caylee, as he was planning on moving back to NY and pursuing a career. She acknowledged this in her IM's with Iassen and also said she would not want to move to NY.
4)
KC's alleged desire to reek revenge on CA
There have been many theories that KC was jealous of the CA/Caylee relationship, or that she wanted to retaliate for the alleged fight on June 15, but these are only theories, unsubstantiated as yet by hard facts. Even the alleged fight of June 15 has not yet been officially confirmed, but if it's true I'm willing to bet it wasn't the first confrontation. If KC wanted revenge, or had been planning to rid herself of Caylee for some time, why didn't she kill her sooner?
5)
KC just didn't want Caylee and had no love for her
I haven't formed any firm opinion on KC's relationship with Caylee, and it's possible that the mother/daughter bond was impaired in some way (possibly due to CA's interference and need for control). It may have been nearer to a big/little sister relationship than a true motherly bond, but
all of KC's friends and family say she showed Caylee real affection, looked after her well, was never seen to be mean to her, interacted well with her etc. Apart from the odd expression of frustration ( and what young single mother never experiences that?), there is no evidence that I have seen that proves KC did not care for Caylee.
Have I missed any? I'll do a further post on evidence that I think supports an accident scenario later, as this one is getting rather long.
