I agree they could have been shot somewhere else because of the lack of blood, however,
I wonder sometimes that we don't have the whole report.
Maybe there was plenty of blood there. You wouldn't be able to see it in those black and white pictures. Jacques heart didn't necessarily have to still be beating to get the trickle from his wound. In moving the body, in turning it over, could cause enough force to eject blood through the vein and through the wound.
I think they could have both been dead when they got there, but I think it was more likely they were killed there.
After all, the neighbor heard gunshots.
Which, by the way, I don't know about you guys, but I've heard what I perceive to be gunshots late at night and I don't call the cops. 1) It's late and I'm tired... could be all in my head and 2) could easily be a car backfiring or any number of other things that would make a sound that I could interpret into a gunshot.
Now, yes, the shots in the neck would have guaranteed death, but why the neck and not the head?
Why shoot them once in the back, once in the neck?
I think they were being followed from the fruit stand. I think someone saw them, maybe even talked to them, knew they were from out of town.
I think that someone saw something he wanted.
And when they left the fruit stand, he followed them. Or perhaps offered them a ride, shooting them in the van, taking what he wanted, moving them to the embankment, shooting them in the neck and driving off.
There would have had to been another person, though, for that to take place.
One person can't move two dead weight bodies nearly as quickly as two strong people.
I'm a nurse, I pick up paralyzed people all the time. I always have to have help.
They don't look posed. They look placed.
I've been reading about the Dirty War. I think it's quite interesting and the similarities are eerie, but I personally think there isn't enough evidence to make a conclusion one way or another. Not just yet.....
