**QUESTION**
What exact details do we have on Gail and the cell phone activity and pings..
And was it MP or LE that released the info about the ping near Wal mart on May 2?..
Thanks to anyone who knows or can point me in the direction of where I might find confirmation of these details..
My thoughts at this moment[and very well may change if anyone has additional or different info concerning cell phone]..
I know she was last seen at 12:15pm leaving her home on Signal Mtn..by neighbor, Susie Buttons.. I know its confirmed thru sister that she spoke with Gail at 6:30am that same morning[30th]while Gail was still at lakehouse in Alabama.. I know there was "talk" of Gail possibly again speaking with sister immediately preceding her last being seen at 12:15{at/around 12 noon }..and am I correct in saying that we never had that in any way confirmed?? Meaning I believe that media articles referring to sister speaking to Gail near the last time she was seen could very well just be referring to the 6:30 am phone call but lost in the story being reported it somehow was possibly alluded to there actually having been a second call btwn sisters..jmo.. Last confirmed call was at 6:30am of the 30th..
And then we have two whole and entire days and nights that pass with nothing seemingly done about Gail not ever returning to the family home from when she left at 12:15 on the 30th.. **QUESTION**.. Do we have any info about cell activity or pings during this approx. 48hr time period btwn the 30th-2nd when she finally was reported Missing??
While I do not know the answer to that above Question the next detail that I do know is that we have confirmed that there was a cell phone ping of Gail's phone near a Wal-Mart on May 2nd.. So for now what I am thinking is possible is that FINALLY on May 2nd when Matt is prodded into FINALLY reporting his wife, Gail MISSING IMO one of the first things that was done once LE was given this MISSING person details and learned that it seemed as tho she most likely did have her cell phone with her since it was not found to be left at the home with the other personal items that she had left behind[i.e. DL and ccards].. IMO I believe that after having learned that detail I believe that LE then "pinged" Gail's phone...This is easily and regularly done by LE incases such as this and infact often is one of the very first things thats done.. Usibng todays technology and knowing that they've got time passing to worry about..because 48hrs+ had already passed since her last known to have been seen therefor very likely that the cell phone had not been charged since then so they would work to get that cell phone "pinged" just as quickly as poissible hoping to get a "ping" location before its battery dies[the phone can be remotely pinged repeatedly indefinitely as long as the battery is in the phone and until the battery dies.. Once the battery is dead there can be NO ping, gps, NO info whatsoever be gotten from the device..
In knowing that I am then lead to another **QUESTION** (that I'm hoping one of you guys has more info that you can point me to and possibly answer or rule pout these questions).. If it is as I believe that once LE were informed of Gail MISSING that they immediately moved fprward with "pinging" the phone.. The are in and around where it pinged at that moment was obviously searched and proved to not have Gail, jeep, or phone{that we know of}.. Of course logically they would "ping" the phone again.. and either the battery died therefor no "ping" available or it indeed gave another oor the same area to search.. So, am I correct in saying that minus the one "ping"
on the 2nd near Wal-Mart we have no other info of whether there were any other successful "ping" or that indeed the battery seemed to have gone dead as the phone could no longer be "pinged"??
Thanks to any that could possibly point to anything that would help me to answer any of my above questions..
I have many more thoughts on the pinging and cell activity but want tyo wait and see if I can get these above questions answered first before going forward with my thoughts on this subject...
TIA!!!