ZFG Civil Case: Casey's Deposition #2

bayouland said:

It seems they are doing everything they can to intimidate ZG which is pretty normal. After all women who are raped are routinely categorized as *advertiser censored*, and so on.

When they get to court, it will be a different ballgame. What Judge would consider all this garbage they are throwing to be relevant? She may not win much, but I hope she wins. But, will ZG get anything or just go to the bottom the long list of creditors?

If FCA had money, I think they would offer to settle for some insulting amount.

JMO

Click to expand...

logicalgirl said:

Oh LinasK - we had so much fun with this one - which hit the tabloids to coincide with Jeff Ashton's book release. How the "bodyguards" found out there was going to be a kidnap attempt was by a note "pinned" to the front door and a warning email.

I was positive she was actually being turfed - that it was simply a Rental Eviction if there was even a grain of truth. But I think Baez looked at the public reaction - which was :great::floorlaugh::great: and quickly denied the rumor.

We've heard so many stories of what OCA is doing, such as therapy, getting an education, writing a book, planning to adopt a child, marrying a Mexican millionaire which are all proven as lies, but this kidnap attempt was THE BEST so far to keep us amused until she has to testify in the ZFG case.

Click to expand...

Oldsoul2 said:

I'm sure I read when KC first got out that she was in California being pitched by a network rep and he said he went to a hotel/motel to meet her and she asked to see the check when he first walked in. This story about the multi millonaire is that he has a private home in La Paz in Baja California off the peninsula of mexico, only accessible by airplane. Did she go there to consummate and seal the deal, is why she was in California??? This man has to be out of his mind.

Click to expand...

Oldsoul2 said:

No logical, it was a network rep looking for the first interview from AAA I believe that claimed that he went to the hotel, she opened the door and said show me the check, he than pitched her and she told him she would do it with him because he offered her 1M up front and than the deal was botched by her lawyers and he was supposed to have sued her because she apprently made a contractual promise to his network.

Click to expand...

Intermezzo said:

IIRC..that was Freelance producer Al Taylor who offered OCA $1 million
He claims the first words out of OCA's mouth was "show me the money"

Click to expand...

BigMomma said:

If anyone needed a good PR person, this dirty DT group is it-along with some attitude adjustment! They are in desperation so they are going lowdown and dirty-Scare tactics, intimidation. It backfired alright. I have even more compassion for ZG now.

I think I'm heading over to the sidebar now. I need something.

Click to expand...

logicalgirl said:

Thanks Intermezzo - it was Al the producer I was remembering - but my feeling was what he was planning on offering her was not first class exposure...

Click to expand...

Intermezzo said:

I guess the Jerry Springer show does not count as first class exposure :floorlaugh:

Click to expand...

Justin Tyme said:

I'm already there with Honey Jack Daniels straight on the rocks.
It's kind of humorous when you think about it. He's already aired what he thinks is ZG's dirty laundry and has left himself nothing to use as leverage. If it weren't for OCA having ZG's name in her mouth to start with we would have never heard about the things that Greene said about ZG's past in a public forum. Therefore, his client has lead to this info on ZG becoming public. Not only do I hope that ZG wins her case I think that she should get extra $$$ for the crap that Greene stated in the public on behalf of his client. Hey, wait a minute. His client didn't say anything, she's taking the 5th. So, should Morgan go after Greene too? I do hope that someone can figure out how to wrap it all up in a tidy bow. ZG did not steal or kill or lie. She's guilty only of being poor. Who cares if her children have different fathers? Or of what age she got pregnant. She still has all of her children, who are alive and she's doing the best she can with what she has. Because a person is poor is no reason to let people push you down any further. If they are trying to recoup OCA's image now would be a good time to start with the truth, an apology to ZG and payment for the hell that OCA put her through from the day that she first mentioned ZG's name up until she apologizes. JMHO

Click to expand...

logicalgirl said:

Thanks for posting the document NavySubMom - now with all the legal quotes, where is HHJP when we need him to sort out all this drivel and horse pucks....

At the bottom of page one, I saw a very strange use of a word - looked it up in the dictionary :waitasec: and a few other places and it must be a legal thing, but what a strange word to use in the middle of describing a criminal history and conviction of lying to the LE while they searched for her dead child.

"Following the rendering of a guilty verdict on the forgoing counts, the Court sentenced Ms. Anthony to a four-year period of incarnation....

No where could I find a meaning that made sense of this. Even if it's a legal wording - still in very bad taste Mr. Greene and quite the joke don't you think?:crazy:

Click to expand...

NavySubMom said:

Here is the Defendant's Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Answers to Deposition Questions Greene filed yesterday Dec. 5 if anyone is interesting in reading this, this is what the DT will be arguing in thursday's hearing to Judge Munyon as to why OCA does not have to answer any questions at all (related to her lying appeal), I love reading these legal documents, lol:

http://www.cfnews13.com/static/articles/images/documents/casey-depo-response-1205.pdf

on p. 12 in the last paragraph, Greene talks about the decision Munyon already made to seal the video portion of OCA's disguised deposition where she repeatedly took the 5th , writing about how people showing that video over and over "undoubtedly would have further tainted the jury pool......."

HOW ABOUT YOU MR. GREENE (yes, I am yelling at him) going to the media a few days ago and blasting ZG and mentioning everything she has ever done in her life, blatantly trying to paint HER in a bad light to taint the jury pool!! How about THAT Mr. Greene?? These Sunshine Laws put the actual documents filed with the Courts out there for us to read (like the one above), we are capable of reading them ourselves, and if this goes to trial we hopefully will see or can read the witness testimony. If ZG's past life is not in some document filed with the Court in this case and would NOT be admissible in Court, Greene should not be tainting the jury pool in OCA's favor against ZG by portraying her in a bad light TO TAINT THE SAME JURY POOL Munyon will not let be tainted AGAINST OCA, because she is just oh so special.

Grrrrrr, anyway, for your reading pleasure if interested.

IMO, MOO, etc.

Click to expand...

AZlawyer said:

Thanks for posting the Response. IMO Mr. Greene, despite having a despicable client, does have the law on his side on the 5th Amd. issue. I keep waiting to see a brief from ZG's lawyers or TES's lawyers explaining why they believe differently, as I freely admit I only spent about 15 minutes researching the issue.

Click to expand...

AZlawyer said:

Thanks for posting the Response. IMO Mr. Greene, despite having a despicable client, does have the law on his side on the 5th Amd. issue. I keep waiting to see a brief from ZG's lawyers or TES's lawyers explaining why they believe differently, as I freely admit I only spent about 15 minutes researching the issue.

Click to expand...

Dells said:

So, in your opinion, is the judge not likely to compel casey to answer any questions from the depositions?

Click to expand...

logicalgirl said:

Sigh - I was hoping you would appear and here you are - and telling us what I suspected you would - but that's okay. Now what about the word "incarnation"? I'm sure that has a legal meaning but what an odd word to put in a document that has to do with OCA?

It doesn't take much to get me riled up these days it seems...:innocent:

By the way - I don't get how her answering questions in this deposition would possibly incriminate her since she was already found guilty on the lying charges and can't be charged in the death of Caylee again...care to expound? Thanks!

Click to expand...

AZlawyer said:

Maybe a question here or there, but not the ones we want her to answer.



"Incarnation" haha...no...that's a typo. Incarceration is the word he was looking for.

She is appealing the lying convictions, so, in theory, the convictions could be vacated and she could be retried. Until the appeal is Totally Over, IMO she has the right to take the 5th on anything relating to those convictions, which is to say anything at all interesting.

Click to expand...

AZlawyer said:

Maybe a question here or there, but not the ones we want her to answer.



"Incarnation" haha...no...that's a typo. Incarceration is the word he was looking for.

She is appealing the lying convictions, so, in theory, the convictions could be vacated and she could be retried. Until the appeal is Totally Over, IMO she has the right to take the 5th on anything relating to those convictions, which is to say anything at all interesting.

Click to expand...