If a person had a record as a young offender, is it automatically sealed or erased. Do they need to apply to have it removed from their record? Not saying MR had a record, just looking for info.
So many questions to ask the COs tomorrow.
<modsnip>
I am curious as to what happens next, more witnesses? What chapter is next? Should we assume that the defense is next?
I really am curious as to see what witnesses he brings forth. His mother?
"Much more revealing, much more difficult to explain, was Mr. Raffertys rabbit-like behaviour after he purportedly got the shock of his life on April 8.
As he confessed in the About me Facebook section, I wear my heart on my sleve and sometimes that can be my downfall.
No dear: That wasnt your heart on your sleeve, or rather sleve: It was a picture of your exceptionally busy penis.
Well, everyone does react differently to being horrified."
Christie Blatchford strikes again... I wish she she was a prosecutor.
If he did rape Tori, do you think the reason why his dating activity after the 8th might have to do with the fact that he wanted to get rid of the image of what he did, just like a rape victim would take a hot shower after to get the dirty out?
I think that it's weird that he would say that he thought police blamed him for the disappearance of Tori all along knowing that he was to blame. I just don't understand how some people <modsnip> can just gloss over that and say there is nothing wrong with MTR.
Bbm, just jmo, I haven't seen that. Jmo
Good question. I assume no one is privy to that information. Too bad.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hello_Kitty
I think that it's weird that he would say that he thought police blamed him for the disappearance of Tori all along knowing that he was to blame. I just don't understand how some people <modsnip> can just gloss over that and say there is nothing wrong with MTR.
Well maybe you haven't, but I have as I'm sure alot others have noticed. But the point is, there is no excuse for his behavior, but "some" people seem to think it is normal. The above example I noted is just one example of many.
Especially scary, since we have heard that MTR was mad that Tori was too old.
Had MTR done bad things before?
One wonders, especially if they seen those pictures from one of his social media accounts, that has him holding the little girl at the wedding, and her body language and facial expressions are such, that you KNOW she does NOT want to be with him AT ALL.
JMO
Tori Stafford trial: Rafferty told Facebook ahead of murder that 'good' things were coming
Read more:
During cross-examination, Waldron agreed that after Rafferty updated his status on April 8, he had performed a search for an ex-girlfriend on the website. He and Alexis Lane had broken up the week before.
"We certainly don't know what was in his head (in the status update) but we certainly know he was searching for Alexis Lane," said his lawyer Dirk Derstine.
Waldron also noted Rafferty and McClintic were not Facebook friends
Read more: http://www.canada.com/life/Tori+Sta...+were+coming/6479522/story.html#ixzz1sRicvyG4
I would like to hear from ANY guy friends he had. I wonder if he had any.
not sure but don't think you can take rentals over the border; if that is relevent. MOO
Probably few to none. He had nothing to gain from them. MOO
I think he's trying to keep the jury focused on what TLM did so they won't focus on the rape and the evidence.
So, this article says Rafferty changed his Facebook Profile status and THEN searched for AL, his ex-gf.
So, if he updated his status just after 10 am, and he searched AL just after 7 am, according to the pic I posted upthread, then, I would presume that the time difference would be because the record for the AL search was for 7 am, California Time (as per FB headquarters).
Otherwise, something is incorrect with this information.
[...snipped...] He told his date that he didn't want use it because Honda Civics attracted too much attention from police.
Like a lot of the Crown presentation........I really don't think it will matter either way.....because I think the defense will concede MR cleaned up the murder scene and tried to appear uninvolved with the crime thereafter.
If MR deleted the data because he was hiding evidence or sending his phone away and didn't know if he would get it back.........is neither here nor there, if the defense admits his participation in the cleanup etc.
All those women he met after the crime, trips shopping, planned trips to the US, phone calls, clothing,.......may be reprehensible conduct, but are all meaningless if he admits to participating in the cleanup etc.
The Crown spent a lot of time trying to prove things they probably won't have to prove.........and already know this..........but they still have to proceed in full anyways, because they can't be sure what the defense will do, until they do it.
Personally, I don't think we have heard the last of a target abduction.
There was lots of information available from news media reports from that time, and I would think Mr.Derstine will make full use of the information contained in them.
Derstine has no restraints placed on him from website TOS, publication bans, or hurt feelings. He can use any resources he needs to defend his client.
I would not be surprised that when the defense takes over................
The gloves come off.............
JMO...............