Evidence subject to Frye - UPDATED 2011.05.09 (ATTN: ALL ORDERS IN!)

Intermezzo · Apr 21, 2011

Here is the Order!!!!

http://www.wesh.com/pdf/27628654/detail.html

Order Denying Motion to Exclude Irrelevant Evidence of Stain in Trunk of Car

"As the movant, The Defendant bears the burden of proving the facts alleged in her motion and justifying the relief requested.
Defendant, however, did not present any factual evidence at the hearing in support of the grounds alleged in the motion and thus failed to meet her burden of proof."
:denied:

Aedrys · Apr 21, 2011

ZsaZsa said:
He's had long enough to decide on all the Frye hearing motions hasn't he?
Does he realize we're all sitting here waiting ?:maddening:

It's not his fault, it's the darn court official that refused to post them to the docket until Monday. If I lived in Florida, I'd be tracking down that court official right now, LOL.

beach · Apr 21, 2011

Aedrys said:
According to Wesh, the rest won't come out until Monday. Darn then for making us wait that long!!!!

<snipped>

So I guess this means I should stop refreshing the clerk's webpage, huh? :sigh:

It is gonna be a long 3 day weekend. :anguish:

Sorry HHJP.... I really am super grateful that you threw us this one to make for a Happy Easter weekend. :heartluv:

Amil · Apr 21, 2011

The defense didn't present any factual evidence! This defendant has never presented anything factual.

Intermezzo · Apr 21, 2011

Amil said:
The defense didn't present any factual evidence! This defendant has never presented anything factual.

bbm
That's a Fact! :floorlaugh:

Aedrys · Apr 21, 2011

Ha, I guess Baez calling it a banana, or a meat eating, doobie smoking, chloroform covered squirrel wrapped in dryer sheets and lying in a bed of trash (compilation of things he tried to say it was) wasn't factual enough. LOL.

katydid23 · Apr 21, 2011

So what does this include? The stain and the fatty deposits too? Or is that covered under a different motion?

sleutherontheside · Apr 21, 2011

Amil said:
The defense didn't present any factual evidence! This defendant has never presented anything factual.

BBM...right you are. BUT, she has plenty of experience with fairytales, fiction, and farce.

cyberborg · Apr 21, 2011

Softail said:
Here is the motion: :denied: :denied:

http://www.wesh.com/pdf/27628654/detail.html

Ouch! This one is going to hurt the Defense. Huge!

Even if the smell of decomp doesn't come in, there are many other testimonies that support the smell of decomp in the trunk.

The Defense needs to link the family member(s) or friend(s) that are going under the bus to the car trunk as well ... and that ICA was threatened and frightened -- thus still driving and dumping it. After all, she accessed the trunk on the driveway to give GA the gas cans back ... so cannot claim she did not know and thought it was roadkill under the car. She was also picked up by TL at Amscot so cannot deny dumping it there before it was towed.

whiteangora · Apr 21, 2011

The news just keeps getting sweeter & sweeter.
Happy Easter JB!:great:

momtective · Apr 21, 2011

Yeah!!!!!!!!! This day just couldn't get much better for me...my son was just awarded a full scholarship from a major law University..... and now this wonderful news from HHJP regarding the stain evidence....I am way too happy! :woohoo:

Aedrys · Apr 21, 2011

cyberborg said:
Ouch! This one is going to hurt the Defense. Huge!

Even if the smell of decomp doesn't come in, there are many other testimonies that support the smell of decomp in the trunk.

The Defense needs to link the family member(s) or friend(s) that are going under the bus to the car trunk as well ... and that ICA was threatened and frightened -- thus still driving and dumping it. After all, she accessed the trunk on the driveway to give GA the gas cans back ... so cannot claim she did not know and thought it was roadkill under the car. She was also picked up by TL at Amscot so cannot deny dumping it there before it was towed.

ITA and the biggest thing - She ADMITTED that she had complete control of the car!!!! That is definitely coming back to bite her big time now!

Anais · Apr 21, 2011

Maybe this is HHJBP's way of softening the blow of what's coming as to the rest of the motions for the DT?!

JSR · Apr 21, 2011

'Beach said:
<snipped>

So I guess this means I should stop refreshing the clerk's webpage, huh? :sigh:

It is gonna be a long 3 day weekend. :anguish:

Sorry HHJP.... I really am super grateful that you threw us this one to make for a Happy Easter weekend. :heartluv:

Actually this works for me Beach. I'm giving myself a much needed break next week. Yup my very own spring break if you will. It's been way too long since I've ever gotten to enjoy a "spring break" (more than I care to admit).

A whole week off! And what am I going to do when taking a break from the legal arena ???? Yes that's right follow another case ....

I'm nutty ....

beach · Apr 21, 2011

katydid23 said:
So what does this include? The stain and the fatty deposits too? Or is that covered under a different motion?

All that is included in this Order.

The chloroform and decomp odor are separate matters. Give me a min to see if I can find them all so we can refresh our memories.

Aedrys · Apr 21, 2011

Anais said:
Maybe this is HHJBP's way of softening the blow of what's coming as to the rest of the motions for the DT?!

Yeah, he wouldn't want to totally ruin the DT's and Casey's Easter. How you like them eggs, Casey and Baez?

Horace Finklestein · Apr 21, 2011

DENIED! Waiting for the next flurry of motions asking HHJP to reconsider.

SunnyinMO · Apr 21, 2011

:woohoo::woohoo:

Is it possible for someone to post the picture of the stain and next to it the stain outlined to show the placement in the trunk? TIA

JSR · Apr 21, 2011

cyberborg said:
Ouch! This one is going to hurt the Defense. Huge!

Even if the smell of decomp doesn't come in, there are many other testimonies that support the smell of decomp in the trunk.

The Defense needs to link the family member(s) or friend(s) that are going under the bus to the car trunk as well ... and that ICA was threatened and frightened -- thus still driving and dumping it. After all, she accessed the trunk on the driveway to give GA the gas cans back ... so cannot claim she did not know and thought it was roadkill under the car. She was also picked up by TL at Amscot so cannot deny dumping it there before it was towed.

I agree Cyber ...

This is going to completely tank Casey.

Anais · Apr 21, 2011

Aedrys said:
Yeah, he wouldn't want to totally ruin the DT's and Casey's Easter. How you like them eggs, Casey and Baez?

I'M totally with ya! Tehehehehe...I seriously believe HHJBP isn't gonna be granting a whole lot of those DT motions..just a 'GUT FEELING".

Evidence subject to Frye - *UPDATED* 2011.05.09 (ATTN: ALL ORDERS IN!)

Well-Known Member

If justice doesn't get you, karma will.

Verified Expert

New Member

Well-Known Member

If justice doesn't get you, karma will.

Well-Known Member

Retired WS Staff

Seeking Justice for Victims

I'm on the right track baby. I was "Born This Way"

Lifetime WS Non-Mod

If justice doesn't get you, karma will.

New Member

Maybe all one can do is hope to end up with the ri

Verified Expert

If justice doesn't get you, karma will.

New Member

Walk softly and carry a big stick

Maybe all one can do is hope to end up with the ri

New Member

DNASolves

Online statistics

Forum statistics

Evidence subject to Frye - UPDATED 2011.05.09 (ATTN: ALL ORDERS IN!)