I'll confess I fell asleep during the closing arguments yesterday. I missed parts of the trial. I've been on the fence and am hoping something said in the closings regarding the testimony will help me.
On one side, there is the 911 call and Adam being downstairs. I can't imagine leaving my possibly dying spouse upstairs to go downstairs to make that call. He could have gone down there to unlock the door for EMT's, but it seems an older woman opened the door for them. MIL? Did he call her first? If Lina weren't dead already, she would have died while he ran downstairs, etc. I don't believe he used a cell phone while on the land line to LE. If there were proof on the 911 call of that, it would be clearer. Did he call friends, relatives, and then 911?
The defense threw out every possible scenario as to how Lina died a natural death. Dr. Baden's explanation of the marks on the neck doesn't make sense, since they were there prior to the EMT's arrival per Adam's 911 call.
What bothers me the most are the various scenarios Adam gave about finding Lina in the bathroom. She was slumped over the toilet, possibly sick from a night of drinking with her friend; if facing the commode, how did she end up on the magazine rack? Did she do a 180 when she passed out? She was sitting on the commode and slumped forward enough when losing consciousness to strangle herself on the leather handle of the magazine "rack", she must have collapsed?
If seated when she lost consciousness, I doubt her upper torso woud have reached the magazine rack, nor would her upper body weight overcome the center of gravity lower on her body.
From the above, you can see that I'm slightly leaning towards an opinion that Adam is guilty.
However, with all the botched investigation and failed hail-Mary passes in the rebuttal case, there is an excellent chance of a quick acquittal if the jury goes by those facts. Or, they could go through all the evidence and make a decision based on what they figure out.
It all depends on how pinellas the jury is.