State vs Jason Lynn Young 2-28-12
- Thread starter ynotdivein
- Start date
- Status
She was a breath of fresh air for the courtroom. Her mind is sharp, particularly on which house and what she saw. I found it interesting that the PT even took pictures of the house, driveway, and the parked vehicle at end of driveway. The DT used those pics to verify she had the right house.
Only one sister testified at the first trial. There was speculation that the other sister believed Jason was guilty because of an email exchange they'd had. The oldest sister asked Jason why he wouldn't speak to police and Jason didn't give her the asnwer she wanted (he said that he hoped there was no arrest while he was the only suspect) ... no further email correspondance was included. He said that he was following his lawyer's advice.
It was posted upthread that maybe she was a loose cannon that might answer incorrectly when cross examined by the prosecution.
She lives in Aberdeen, and is apparently studying in Raleigh and renting there ... not sure I understood all of that correctly.
I don't know if it's a "red herring" to demonstrate for the jury that the one mother in law interfered with the other mother in law having contact with the grandchild. It seems to me to be rather irrelevant. We already know that the two women did not get along and participated in the marriage tug of war.
I haven't seen any comments suggesting that a mother's testimony at her son's murder trial will not have a slant. Of course it will have a slant. If anyone gets a pass for only seeing the best interpretation of the suspect's words, deeds and actions, it's his mom. Did she tell whoppers like Amanda Knox?
LolaBunnies
Member
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2012
- Messages
- 25
- Reaction score
- 3
So he could try to say she was killed before she went to bed. That's why I think he showed his face on camera around 12am at the hotel. JMO
That was funny too ... it was almost like she hadn't seen all the photos before, then she identified herself standing in front of the car when they staged it.
That's an interesting perspective. Perhaps the lights were still on from her late guest (11 PM?). Shouldn't we assume that robbers, bad guys and husbands that murder wives at home would not turn on all the lights - including the porch and driveway lights? The fact that the lights were on at the end of the driveway would suggest that they were not turned off from the evening before when her friend drove home ... after sensing something creepy in the bushes.
LolaBunnies
Member
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2012
- Messages
- 25
- Reaction score
- 3
I honestly think she was already sleeping when she was struck. She had a pillow between her legs....I slept like that when I was pregnant. Plus from seeing photos on wral, there were picture frames, lamps, etc. still in place....so not much of a struggle IMO. She was caught off guar IMO.
Warning ... graphic post
If she was in a struggle, and IIRC early reports suggested a prolonged struggle (based on injuries: attempted strangulation, then blunt force) lasting up to 10 minutes. If she was in a struggle, would she have a pillow between her legs at the end?
If she was sleeping ... and we know that she fought off strangulation because she scratched her own neck in the process ... was she attacked while sleeping and fought off the strangulation while lying down, but then was wrestled off the bed, onto the floor, trapped between the bed and Jason's closet and eventually beaten to death?
Hush Puppy shoes have soft uppers don't they? I guess that rules out kicking in the size 12 hush puppies ... not a half moon, crescent shaped, injury. If the beating started on the bed, why the strangulation? If there was a crescent shaped weapon, why the strangulation? If the weapon was a tool of convenience that was already in the room, what is missing. If he brought the weapon ... why use hands at the beginning. Something about this case doesn't add up.
Here's an odd question ... about brown and black shoes. In the post funeral photos I've seen, Jason is wearing a charcoal suit. We have seen the recently purchased brown shoes that Jason had at the NTO, the brown shoes he had in the car ... was Jason wearing light brown shoes with his charcoal suit at the funeral? That seems like an odd choice.
The bolded part is something I've seen in several familial murders ... Entwhistle, Anthony ... Jason? ... maybe even Scott Peterson, the bovine fertilizer guy.
"Michelle Young's father told investigators his son-in-law is methodical, very smart and can change who he wants to be, according to new search warrants in the unsolved murder case of the 29-year-old pregnant mother.
"We're convinced he's a chameleon," Alan Fisher told Wake County sheriff's investigators. "He is what you want him to be, and he's got multiple personalities and he leads you to believe that that's the person he is. The minute he's out of your presence, he's a chameleon to someone else."
http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/4507783/
"Michelle Young's father told investigators his son-in-law is methodical, very smart and can change who he wants to be, according to new search warrants in the unsolved murder case of the 29-year-old pregnant mother.
"We're convinced he's a chameleon," Alan Fisher told Wake County sheriff's investigators. "He is what you want him to be, and he's got multiple personalities and he leads you to believe that that's the person he is. The minute he's out of your presence, he's a chameleon to someone else."
http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/4507783/
BrownRice
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2008
- Messages
- 4,791
- Reaction score
- 16,728
And Jason has a history of insurance fraud (1. wanting to enroll in home warranty insurance for a pre-x broken heat pump; 2. saying he hadn't smoked cigars).
BrownRice
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2008
- Messages
- 4,791
- Reaction score
- 16,728
Maybe he (testifying officer) was unaware of the relationship. No lying or anything nefarious.
The second part is iffy. The question on the insurance form asked whether or not he had smoked cigars during the previous year. It's possible that an occasional cigar smoker could answer no and still be truthful.
On the tire tracks. It was already testified in this trial that those tracks were made by the same standard issue tires on a 2004 Ford Explorer.
- Status
DNASolves
Online statistics
- Members online
- 185
- Guests online
- 4,351
- Total visitors
- 4,536