Sorry, I must have missed something. I think, though, that much of what I'm being asked here is unknowable. My "conspiracy theory" is based upon what I consider to be glaring oddities in the case. I believe I've noted just about all of them that I question. I recognize that you, and most other posters here, do not agree with me at all.
I don't believe one can relate the specifics of something that one cannot know the specifics of, unless one is involved. I'm obviously not involved in a conspiracy to frame Joran, and the conspirators haven't bothered to let me in on the details, so all I can do is speculate. I've also done plenty of that here.
I remain very skeptical about a murder when, after nearly a month, the most basic "facts" about the crime scene continue to change. Where even the essential aspects- murder weapon, cause of death, position of body, amount of blood, etc.- continually "evolve." This cannot all be attributed to media mistakes, or translation errors. A few weeks ago, we should have known these things conclusively, and they should not have changed again.
That being said, there is an entirely different standard of justice in Peru, and it is almost a certainty that Joran will be convicted. That is, if he lives to go to trail, which is no sure thing.
