askfornina
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 24, 2011
- Messages
- 1,876
- Reaction score
- 32
I haven't even seen her serve it once yet...
check out post number 200 in this thread for a more detailed explanation snipped from the ask a lawyer thread
I haven't even seen her serve it once yet...
Richard H and JBean....I was hoping for an optimistic outcome from you two.
OK here ya go. Due to all the scrutiny, DOC will review time served and find another error decreasing her time served credit by 365 days. The probation issue will take a back burner and she will be remanded to the county jail for a period NTX one year and will not be eligible for good time/work time.
How's that?
OK here ya go. Due to all the scrutiny, DOC will review time served and find another error decreasing her time served credit by 365 days. The probation issue will take a back burner and she will be remanded to the county jail for a period NTX one year and will not be eligible for good time/work time.
How's that?
IIRC if you are in solitary you get 2 days for every 1 day served in the calculations. ZThat was from during the sentencing, no idea how to find the quote tho
OK here ya go. Due to all the scrutiny, DOC will review time served and find another error decreasing her time served credit by 365 days. The probation issue will take a back burner and she will be remanded to the county jail for a period NTX one year and will not be eligible for good time/work time.
How's that?
The judge through case law, not the probation department decides whether the probation order was carried out.
Right now they are in a position of determining if she served her probation. The lawyers all over the net disagree on this. Only Judge Perry will be the one to decide. The probation as it is described is an administrative probation which was not what was ordered by the court.
Now, I have already said because of the time delay, this order may not fly. But a thorough and full investigation of how time was calculated certainly is within the 60 day time limit and Casey may just wish that Mason let her go on probation for a year. Any calculation of the days for purposes of Judge Perry's Order can be amended. And worst case Casey could be back behind bars.
Right.
The 412 days for the fraud convictions, the one year probation, and the 1,460 days for the lying convictions were all taken care if in less than 1,100 days.
(I think Casey's total was 1,007 days in jail but I am not sure the exact number.)
She was arrested, out on bail, re-arrested, and then the convictions, probation, etc. enter in. I can see how a calculation error was made and how things got confusing/overlooked. What I cannot see is just letting it go!
I am disappointed in this country.
Don't you mean BEST case scenario? :crazy:
Respectfully, let me try this another way. Seeing my previous post got deleted. It sounds to me like there is no superior over-sight judicial check system in place on Judges. And they rule as final say. No matter what they rule. Well that smacks of far too much power.IMO The DT can always go to a higher court for a ruling change. But it seems the prosecution is held completely to what a Judge says. Even judges who make incompetent mistakes. Or make political self serving decisions.
This is far from a fair and equable situation between the two court sides of the law.IMO The burden is on the prosecution in court cases. Yet they must function under a handicap. I would think this must be a far cry from what the founding Fathers laid down for the legal system in the USA. The people of the society should have equal courts rights as the accused.IMO Oh how this Casey case is highlighting a core problem here.IMO I sure do not think this is making for the best legal system in the world, as is widely touted by the people.IMO
That my friend I do agree with. I was just stating I didnt believe it to be political motivated in this motion and nothing I have seen from these judges made me believe it was. But I totally agree that the legal system here is flawed and needs some major work.:twocents:
Well I guess that would depend whether you are the defense or many of us. :great:
Not only does she benefit from loopholes, lies and having her father being a pedophile, she benefits from juries, the media and clerks with bad hearing. She really does have the luck of the Irish and she also found a pot of gold at the end of the rainbow media.
Seeing her, mason, baez, simms, fennel, her family or anyone else basking in the light of victory and the search for more money on the deathbed of Caylee makes me squirm. It likens my feelings to the FDLS case. This is oh so wrong. I am disappointed in this country.
bbm :tyou:Not only does she benefit from loopholes, lies and having her father being a pedophile, she benefits from juries, the media and clerks with bad hearing. She really does have the luck of the Irish and she also found a pot of gold at the end of the rainbow media.
Seeing her, mason, baez, simms, fennel, her family or anyone else basking in the light of victory and the search for more money on the deathbed of Caylee makes me squirm. It likens my feelings to the FDLS case. This is oh so wrong. I am disappointed in this country.