Exactly, this is one of those weird little defense side shows that really makes no sense to we lay people. The whole argument of whether or not the car smelled like a dead body, and to who and when, pretty much became a moot point when the actual dead body was in fact discovered in the woods off Suburban drive. Prior to that the smell evidence was needed to prove that there was in fact a homicide, but now? Not so much. It is simply evidence as to the chain of movement, but it has so much corraborating evidence that arguing about it seems rather counterproductive. Granted those tapes from the heat of the moment are extremely compelling. They show Cindy's true fears and KC's true lack of concern and her lying. But even then there is no way you would be able to keep that out of court. The accused spoke on the tapes?
The only other reason I can see for making this big of a stink about those tapes, is someone plans on attempting to throw Cindy under the bus next, as a reasonable doubt option. Given Cindy's apparent unhinged personality, and reports that she was even trying to strangle KC the night before it all went down, she would be a really really easy target as a possible defense suspect. But those 911 tapes just kill that. No jury would hear those tapes and think that there was any possibility that Cindy was to blame for what happened to Caylee, or even entertain the smallest doubt about it. I really hope BC has figured out that these attempts to block the tapes are in part to set up his clients, and has advised them accordingly?
