Of course, my questions were rhetorical. I know why they lied about the flashlight, pineapple and BR being awake.
But the panties...they are a puzzle, and I know you disagree with me but I feel they DO have a significance. I think that she was wearing a Wednesday pair that day to the White's - her OWN pair in her OWN size. I think the Rs feared that someone at the White's may have seen them, if they had helped her in the bathroom (as she was known to ask). Later on, when the description of her clothing became public- someone could have come forward to say that when THEY saw her, she was wearing something different. I don't think they were worried that her own clean (albeit stained) panties from her panty drawer had fecal staining- as they all did. I think what they were worried about was that they needed an "unbloodied" identcial pair that also said "Wednesday". The size didn't matter- to THEM. They thought it wouldn't matter to anyone else either.
DeeDee249
You may be correct over the size-12's but would they not have to be the same color too? Although you suggest the size does not matter, what about any alleged witness who saw them, would they not note the size, e.g. JonBenet would not need to take of her size-12's they would just fall to the floor?
imo to stage a crime-scene using those size-12's, then to remove the remaining pairs, particularly when you are setting up an intruder scenario, is simply counter-productive. I reckon the Wednesday detail is probably a consequence of it being available, and not the main reason why she was redressed in size-12's.