songline
New Member
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2007
- Messages
- 20,158
- Reaction score
- 58
Great in a normal situation he would be able to rescind, and play games with the law.I understand and can fully identify with the feeling. I am not an attorney or a law student. And my understanding of the hearsay law is weak, but we have had quite a few discussions on it here. A good place to start looking for discussions about the hearsay law is in the Peterson case.
The college campus officers can testify as to what they saw, PG was there, and the girls later identified as the daughters of Jaycee and PG were there. And they can testify as to what actions they took, namely calling the parole officer. The parole officer can testify that he called PG into his office based on that call, and what he told him about bringing in household members. And that PG showed up with these members. But I'm not sure that he can say what PG or the others told him. The parole officer can testify as to what actions he took.
Now if PG gets on the stand and denys that he ever admitted to kidnapping Jaycee, then the parole officer can be brought forward to rebut the denial. If PG signed any confessions, that can be brought into the trial, or if there is any recording of the confession. But PG can still recant, then it will be left up to the jury which story they believe.
BUT this SOB will not be able to do any such a thing because neither the public or 12 drugged up jurors would not let this guy walk again. END of story because there is not one Law on this earth that wants to see this guy walk out free.
HE WILL NOT BE WALKING.You know it, I know it we all know it.
and I do not mean to be snark.