OMG, defense wanted to know if she had talked to Murray during treatment. She said multiple brief conversations. Defense then asked how many are multiple, and how brief. Defense just asked I want particulars and you just aren't capable of precise answers, correct. I would be upset to say the least if I was this witness.
Conrad Murray trial -Day five.
- Thread starter Soulmagent
- Start date
Would you be upset at the witness or defense? I would be upset with defense, but I don't suffer fools graciously.
Soulmagent
On Time Out
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2008
- Messages
- 9,193
- Reaction score
- 9,824
Realy why didnt the defence just wanna show her their copy of her report?
I bet he wasnt asking her to say show it to me. Glad she pulled herself together.
At first I was upset with her because she didnt know the halflife of Lorazopam Really that the top 200 meaning most people in the medical feild have to know all about the top 200 prescribed drug and their generics.
Then I was back to being iffy on the defence ,then i went over iffy to annoyedat the defence when she asked for the paper and he acted like that was to much for him. Like she is supposed to remember what she wrote word for word in 2009.
I think they are tied in likability in the low numbers.
I bet he wasnt asking her to say show it to me. Glad she pulled herself together.
At first I was upset with her because she didnt know the halflife of Lorazopam Really that the top 200 meaning most people in the medical feild have to know all about the top 200 prescribed drug and their generics.
Then I was back to being iffy on the defence ,then i went over iffy to annoyedat the defence when she asked for the paper and he acted like that was to much for him. Like she is supposed to remember what she wrote word for word in 2009.
I think they are tied in likability in the low numbers.
Isabelle
Verified registered nurse
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2008
- Messages
- 8,691
- Reaction score
- 1,698
He is clearly badgering her. The payoff for this won't be good.
Yes, I meant I would be upset with the defense. There is no reason for him to be badgering this witness, IMO.
Defense was going to read her ER notes to her. Defense said, "I can't read you writting, can I approach the witness."
She read off what he asked her to and then took the notes away. Now he is turning pages to find the date it was written.
Why didn't he just find another copy, or here's a question, have one for her to use during this questioning?
She read off what he asked her to and then took the notes away. Now he is turning pages to find the date it was written.
Why didn't he just find another copy, or here's a question, have one for her to use during this questioning?
Defense asked witness if they had taken patient's temperature. Witness said at some point we would have done that.
I would assume she was too busy trying to save a life.
Defense asked if this would help determine death. I didn't catch what the witness said.
I would assume she was too busy trying to save a life.
Defense asked if this would help determine death. I didn't catch what the witness said.
Defense, "you performed and hour and fifteen minutes of resusitation at the medical center, would you have done the same if the patient was other than Michael Jackson?" (not perfect translation but close)?
Witness replied no, standard procedure no matter who.
Witness replied no, standard procedure no matter who.
mysteriew
A diamond in process
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2004
- Messages
- 23,811
- Reaction score
- 783
What he is trying to do here is to split the guilt. If he can make her look like she is the slightest bit incompetent or that the treatment may have been in the least inadequate he can mitigate his client's guilt somewhat. So the question about what time she talked to Dr. or how often she talked to him is very unfair.
I've been in codes. They record times when treatment was given. But things are so tense and moving so rapidly that any extraneous activity barely gets noticed and definitely they don't know what time it happened.