State v Bradley Cooper 4-28-2011

New Posts

Status
Not open for further replies.
Kurtz now asking judge to reconsider allowing witness testimony...
 
for those not watching... Defense asking Judge to reconsider allowing this testimony in court
 
state saying they are prejudiced by the guy (and to a degree they are) but yet they apparently soon want to introduce new technical evidence. Going to be sticky!
 
gritguy said:
state saying they are prejudiced by the guy (and to a degree they are) but yet they apparently soon want to introduce new technical evidence. Going to be sticky!
Click to expand...

Oh what a tangled web we weave.
 
Kurtz should remind the judge that this witness explained the expertise of JW and why he should be allowed to talk about the files...then allow JW to be recalled.
 
BrownRice said:
Could be she forgot. When I have my kids with me at the market, I forgot most of the important stuff.
Click to expand...

I will say Nancy Coopers little girls appeared to be very well-behavied in the shopping cart, while she was checking out. What a sad sight to see. the last time they would ever be out with their mom. :(
 
ncsu95 said:
Kurtz should remind the judge that this witness explained the expertise of JW and why he should be allowed to talk about the files...then allow JW to be recalled.
Click to expand...

Too messy. (Remember the facebook mess)
 
I say, let the guy in after the router evidence gets testified to..as maybe it does show exactly who accessed the computer via VPN.... And this witness hasnt even completed his report yet..so bottomline maybe his FINAL anaysis may end up either proving Pros. or Def. side of things....

Just as aside.I liked this witness..he did come across very affable!! pleasant and forthcoming.... Yikes, whole line of typing got missed...Regarding the Cisco coming in late in the game regarding the router...Who found it??Wonder who left it there?...Geesh, I wish Cisco had a better controls of tracking their gear!!
 
Where did this expert come from? I missed the beginning.
 
JG..."We may not even get to rebuttal evidence." Wonder what he is thinking there.
 
Explain it for the 1,000th time, judge. Good!! Denied!! Yesssssss
 
With jury let loose, attorneys and judge are free to speak only in cliches and analogies and hyperbole as they love to do!

Judge rules the guy cannot testify. Failure to comply w 15A-905.
 
Can someone give me a quick recap. I was out. It sounds like the smoking gun isn't smoking as much?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

DNASolves

Who is Escambia County John Doe (1989)?

Members online

... and 199 more.
Total: 4,137 (members: 200, guests: 3,937)

Online statistics

Members online
200
Guests online
3,937
Total visitors
4,137
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
591,835
Messages
17,959,798
Members
228,621
Latest member
Greer∆
Back
Top