logicalgirl
Peace Hawk
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2009
- Messages
- 16,024
- Reaction score
- 2
Gnatcatcher;8186128]The DNA and fingerprints were washed away due to Caylee's dead body being swept under water for 6 months. How about the dead body in the back of Casey's abandoned car?
Oh man, why am I arguing this? It's beyond ridiculous.
Especially because you don't have all your facts right. DNA was found however it did not belong to Casey. They found a dead body in the back of Casey' car? Or you mean a stain? Which also was found negative for blood.
Heather Seubert, who worked in the forensic DNA analysis unit at the FBI when she examined evidence in the case, testified that DNA on duct tape at the crime scene did not match Caylee or her mother or grandparents.
Brown and yellow areas were identified throughout as possible stains," Seubert said when speaking about testing done on stains from inside the trunk of Anthony's car. All stains tested were "negative for the presence of blood," Seubert told jurors. [/QUOTE]
For the record, there was no dna on the duct tape when it was retrieved because it had been exposed to the elements for six months, including being underwater for at least a month. The dna on the duct tape was confirmed as belonging to one of the CSI from the lab.
Neither DNA or white blood cells which are needed to identify DNA, can be identified in a decomposing human corpse once it starts to liquify. But DNA can be extracted from bones unless they too were exposed to the elements as little Caylee's were for a period of six months.....any biologist will confirm those facts.