, the 2 pair that LE took from G&C's were actually from Caylee's changing table...so...maybe I carelessly assigned the sunglasses to Casey instead of Caylee . this description of shopping-center-outfit ~6/12 w/ what Caylee was allegedly last wearing on 6/16, sans-sunglasses, as described by Casey's statement )during which Caylee was in ZFG's care."
Unless LE or the prosecution has asked for the diary in the last two weeks, we won't see any reports on it. Recall on Larry King Live that Larry asked about the diary and BC said it was in his possession, and he'd be happy to give it to either the prosecution or the defense if they wanted it. Just prior to that Cindy had said that it was shown to the prosecution and they did not want it.
Thanks I did have their names somewhere. I do not mean their names.
Earlier I only noted the comments 'bout some sunglasses being taken from G&C's in passing. IOW...I didn't pay close attention :bang: which has become my m.o. of late
At the time I thought I recalled some posters suggesting LE was prolly interested in the potential for Casey to have torn the duct tape w/ her teeth, hence, bite impressions from the sunglasses (if Casey had a habit like many of sticking them in her mouth) might provide a means to connect the duct tape to Casey).
If I'm reading it correctly now ( :nuclear: WARNING :nuclear:: A thinking Bond presents a clear & present danger :bang
2 pair, white plastic rimmed sunglasses
- 1 pair w/ oval frames
- 1 pair w/ rounded-rectangular frames
So...now I'm curious if these were of interest because...
(a) Perhaps LE could use them re: an account loosely attributed to George in the media (although I'm unable to source) regarding what Caylee was seen wearing ~6/12, "Family friends allegedly spot Caylee in a shopping center near the Orange-Seminole county line. She was reportedly wearing a pink and blue outfit and white-rimmed sunglasses."
Its worth noting that another WS speculated that the media may have confused
Also worth noting that I've seen sleuthing suggesting the 'shopping-center-sighting' may have been 6/10 around the time of picking up Tony's car from Tom's Repair, or, around 6/11 around the time of the Mall of Millenia (albeit not near Seminole County line) & Cheescake Factory visit.
...in any regard...I'm rambling around to get to an obscure point. IF Casey told George she dropped Caylee w/ nanny, ZFG, etc. ~6/12 and LE can place Caylee w/ Casey for this ~6/12 sighting (via statements & pings)...that further helps disolve an already-ethereal ZFG.
IOW...collecting the sunglasses would allow SA to confirm w/ the witness...SA: "Were these the sunglasses you saw Caylee wearing?" A: "Why...yes! Yes, they were." SA: "Let the record reflect that the witness has identified Exhibit umptyscratch which was removed from Caylee's changing table, placing her @ shopping center XYZ concurrent w/ Ms. Anthony's Exhibit umptyscratch+1 placing her in the same vicinity @ a period alleged by Mr. Anthony (OK I'm completely fabricating now...
...ok...that's a huge stretch...and a long way to go for some courtroom portrayal, eh? :bang:
"The events depicted in this post & some of the peeps in Casey's alibi are partially or wholly fictitious. Any similarity to any events or persons living is merely & partially coincidental."
(b) Perhaps LE could be interested in Caylee's bite impressions as a potential to match possible bite impressions in the duct tape...IOW...evidence of tape placed on Caylee peri-mortem. :frown: I don't wanna think 'bout this one anymore than absolutely necessary.
(c)????
Does the communication 'tween the agencies 'bout the duct tape leave this area open as an option?
This link might help:Thanks I did have their names somewhere. I do not mean their names.
I just found it very odd that they would come to see her in jail.
I wonder if I wanted to go see her NOTjust saying.
Would they just let me in?????
M meter is on the red side of this - not green - not yellow.
Curious about who they really are
Earlier I only noted the comments 'bout some sunglasses being taken from G&C's in passing. IOW...I didn't pay close attention :bang: which has become my m.o. of late
At the time I thought I recalled some posters suggesting LE was prolly interested in the potential for Casey to have torn the duct tape w/ her teeth, hence, bite impressions from the sunglasses (if Casey had a habit like many of sticking them in her mouth) might provide a means to connect the duct tape to Casey).
If I'm reading it correctly now ( :nuclear: WARNING :nuclear:: A thinking Bond presents a clear & present danger :bang2 pair, white plastic rimmed sunglassesSo...now I'm curious if these were of interest because...
- 1 pair w/ oval frames
- 1 pair w/ rounded-rectangular frames
(a) Perhaps LE could use them re: an account loosely attributed to George in the media (although I'm unable to source) regarding what Caylee was seen wearing ~6/12, "Family friends allegedly spot Caylee in a shopping center near the Orange-Seminole county line. She was reportedly wearing a pink and blue outfit and white-rimmed sunglasses."Does the communication 'tween the agencies 'bout the duct tape leave this area open as an option?
Its worth noting that another WS speculated that the media may have confused
Also worth noting that I've seen sleuthing suggesting the 'shopping-center-sighting' may have been 6/10 around the time of picking up Tony's car from Tom's Repair, or, around 6/11 around the time of the Mall of Millenia (albeit not near Seminole County line) & Cheescake Factory visit.
...in any regard...I'm rambling around to get to an obscure point. IF Casey told George she dropped Caylee w/ nanny, ZFG, etc. ~6/12 and LE can place Caylee w/ Casey for this ~6/12 sighting (via statements & pings)...that further helps disolve an already-ethereal ZFG.
IOW...collecting the sunglasses would allow SA to confirm w/ the witness...SA: "Were these the sunglasses you saw Caylee wearing?" A: "Why...yes! Yes, they were." SA: "Let the record reflect that the witness has identified Exhibit umptyscratch which was removed from Caylee's changing table, placing her @ shopping center XYZ concurrent w/ Ms. Anthony's Exhibit umptyscratch+1 placing her in the same vicinity @ a period alleged by Mr. Anthony (OK I'm completely fabricating now...
...ok...that's a huge stretch...and a long way to go for some courtroom portrayal, eh? :bang:
"The events depicted in this post & some of the peeps in Casey's alibi are partially or wholly fictitious. Any similarity to any events or persons living is merely & partially coincidental."
(b) Perhaps LE could be interested in Caylee's bite impressions as a potential to match possible bite impressions in the duct tape...IOW...evidence of tape placed on Caylee peri-mortem. :frown: I don't wanna think 'bout this one anymore than absolutely necessary.
(c)????
Then from George's Aug. 4 interview:
From the property forms filled out during the Dec. 20th search warrant:
Noting that none of the property items listed above were sent to the FBI for examination...
What is interesting is that they phrase it as "...the original clothing George Anthony last saw..." IMHO, on the evening of July 15 when George and Cindy were talking to LE and tried to lay out events as they understood them, KC was either present or within earshot and made sure her story was consistent with George and Cindy's recollection at that moment. This included not only the June 9 vs June 16 mixup, but also George's incorrect memory of what Caylee was wearing.
Hi Christee
you are a sweetie... I read that. it really doe not answer what I am curious about. Casey had no clue who they are it seemed to me that perhaps someone sent them to reassure her that she is in good hands. WHO are they ? not what is their name :crazy: I am not sure I am being clear.
*snipped*
- Plastic bag with knot in it - open-ended analysis requested. As with the first bag, was anything of interest found in this bag?
*snipped*
*snipped*
...and like a moth to a flame...
FWIW...perhaps the date printed on the neck of the Gatorade bottle may be "Jun 21 07"...perhaps...dunno how that fares w/ typical shelf life of Gatorade vs. potential use in Jun 08. Perhaps its "09" vs "07".
IMHO, the excellent condition of the label (e.g. doesn't appear to be too faded...or torn...or unglued from the bottle) kinda betrays it being exposed to the elements too long.
I think this is Patrick B's Myspace pg but it's set to private:Hi Christee
but thanks a lot. :blowkiss:
