Any chance there are some of these available online?
I think some nice examples of before murder/after murder would go nicely in this thread.
Not sure. LONG ago I saw a sample from one of the Christmas newsletters.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Any chance there are some of these available online?
I think some nice examples of before murder/after murder would go nicely in this thread.
Patsy knew exactly what they were showing her.
Interesting that it was noted (by one of BR's teachers, I believe) that Patsy ALWAYS handwrote the notes she sent in for JB and BR before the murder. But AFTER JB was killed, all her notes were typed. She was also said to have altered her handwriting after, differing even from her own KNOWN samples (like her Christmas newsletters).
Absolutely, there can be dueling experts, but seeing is believing.
Well, I am sharing with you all a bit of an early Christmas present which I received, Michelle Dresbolds book, Sex, Lies and Handwriting (with Cina Wongs analysis.)
The note alone is like the case as a whole, lots of little bits on their own mean nothing, but looked at together they tell a different story.
Patsy knew exactly what they were showing her.
Interesting that it was noted (by one of BR's teachers, I believe) that Patsy ALWAYS handwrote the notes she sent in for JB and BR before the murder. But AFTER JB was killed, all her notes were typed. She was also said to have altered her handwriting after, differing even from her own KNOWN samples (like her Christmas newsletters).
You can't tell me that's a coincidence.
Patsy knew exactly what they were showing her.
Interesting that it was noted (by one of BR's teachers, I believe) that Patsy ALWAYS handwrote the notes she sent in for JB and BR before the murder. But AFTER JB was killed, all her notes were typed. She was also said to have altered her handwriting after, differing even from her own KNOWN samples (like her Christmas newsletters).
Patsy knew exactly what they were showing her.
Interesting that it was noted (by one of BR's teachers, I believe) that Patsy ALWAYS handwrote the notes she sent in for JB and BR before the murder. But AFTER JB was killed, all her notes were typed. She was also said to have altered her handwriting after, differing even from her own KNOWN samples (like her Christmas newsletters).
by bold
I think it would be more accurate to say ST alleged that she "altered her handwriting after, differing even from her own KNOWN samples (like her Christmas newsletters)." We only have his word for all of this.
"During the interview, Thomas described how out of 73 suspects whose writing samples were analyzed by experts in comparison with the note, Patsy Ramsey was the only one who could not be excluded as its author. He also accused Patsy Ramsey of changing her handwriting after the murder. "In the ransom note, almost exclusively the lowercase manuscript a was used, I think, 98 percent of the time," he said. "What was telling was that after the Ramseys were given a copy of the ransom note, the lowercase manuscript a almost disappeared entirely from Patsy's post-homicide writing. Writing samples from Ramseys' personal letters and notes she wrote before the killing contain 732 manuscript a's that look like the lowercase typewritten a, but they are written by hand. She switched to a cursive a after the murder."
This is exactly what I said in one of my above posts. I had read about the a's before...but I didn't know that ST said this too.
I am quite positive that ST is not the only person that recognized that she changed her handwriting style. I have yet to hear anyone that studied those before and after writing samples...disagree with him. It's not like he was locked in some room by himself with those samples. Nay sayers also believed that Mark Furhman was making things up too. Steve Thomas is the Mark Furhman of the JB case. Just because you disagree with him, does not mean that he is making things up. Someone would have stepped forward a long time ago...and cleared that up...if the changing of the handwriting style was not true.
"During the interview, Thomas described how out of 73 suspects whose writing samples were analyzed by experts in comparison with the note, Patsy Ramsey was the only one who could not be excluded as its author. He also accused Patsy Ramsey of changing her handwriting after the murder. "In the ransom note, almost exclusively the lowercase manuscript a was used, I think, 98 percent of the time," he said. "What was telling was that after the Ramseys were given a copy of the ransom note, the lowercase manuscript a almost disappeared entirely from Patsy's post-homicide writing. Writing samples from Ramseys' personal letters and notes she wrote before the killing contain 732 manuscript a's that look like the lowercase typewritten a, but they are written by hand. She switched to a cursive a after the murder."
This is exactly what I said in one of my above posts. I had read about the a's before...but I didn't know that ST said this too.
I am quite positive that ST is not the only person that recognized that she changed her handwriting style. I have yet to hear anyone that studied those before and after writing samples...disagree with him. It's not like he was locked in some room by himself with those samples. Nay sayers also believed that Mark Furhman was making things up too. Steve Thomas is the Mark Furhman of the JB case. Just because you disagree with him, does not mean that he is making things up. Someone would have stepped forward a long time ago...and cleared that up...if the changing of the handwriting style was not true.
Just remind me again. Wasn't ST successfully sued by the Rs??
These notes are in cursive. The ransom note is printed. (I myself make manuscript a's when printing but not when writing in cursive. AND I prefer printing to cursive.)
Ok, here's an example from before the murder from PR from ACR. I count about 11 lower case "a"s, none of which are written typewriter style.
Perhaps SD can enlighten us, although we all now know he isn't ST, he does seem to know a lot about him. I had it in my mind that there was a discussion here that ST did a deal of some kind with the Rs that he wouldn't talk/write etc about the case, in return for something (dropping the suite?).
I voted NO Patsy did not write that note.
It is my belief that we have some very good handwriting analysts and she would not have escaped them
JMHO
Having said that.
I have always suspected the brother and I have no Idea WHY I have, but I have.
I felt that he has been protected all along. GRANTED he was just a minor.
This case was long ago and I was riveted to it then...Long before I knew about WS.
So that was my synopsis; If not the brother definitely someone close to the family.
JMHO
I have not been reading here on this case,
These notes are in cursive. The ransom note is printed. (I myself make manuscript a's when printing but not when writing in cursive. AND I prefer printing to cursive.)
So...did PR prefer printing notes to writing in cursive prior to the death of JBR?
So just to be clear, you're saying that cursive was her preferred writing method before the death? And she continued to use that as her preferred writing method after the death? No going from printing to cursive or printing to typing or cursive to typing? Do we have expanded examples of this? (More before/afters?)Precisely. The point I was making is that it was only ST who alleged she changed her writing style after the murder. If she decided to type everything after, I could understand that, because you could guess than even a grocery list would be worth a fortune if sold to a tabloid. The fact was that she didn't change her writing style at all, but cursive was her usual writing mode. The fact that the RN writer chose printing does not mean it was usual for PR to print. I just looked at a printed RN exemplar of hers and while the "manuscript 'a's" exist, there is at least an equal number of 'a's written normally. The RN has consistent manuscript 'a's. This is just another one of those 'half-truths' designed to make PR look guilty.